Jimdee, I could debate with you for a while about security thru obscurity,
but I must say, that your post just freaking JUMPED out at me.
[golf clap]
Awesome stuff. Simply Awesome.
[/golf clap]
What a list of lists, too! My lord!
Too late to vote but I vote for Jim! From 3 IPs!
On 3/5/07, Ji
Yes I know :) I even used this as a joke with fellow developers at my
company - cftransaction that rolls back *everything*
TK
- Original Message -
From: "Claude_Schnéegans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: Question
> >>yes if your
Just a cautionary word: that works wonderfully for straight output, but if
you were to do say a listFind() on the altered list, CF wouldn't find the
item you were searching for unless you prepended it with a space (e.g.
listFind(myList, ' myString') ). But for output, it certainly is a whole
lot m
I guess I should mark all of my responses to DB related questions with
"refers mostly to SQL Server 2000". So Jochem when you see my DB post think
SQL Server 2000 - I am yet to work more with SQL 2005.
TK
- Original Message -
From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Shanti, shanti. No need to get heated over this subject.
I find the rules in place (hate, racism, etc.) are absolutely
sufficient. I mean, porn...sorry...'adult themed' sites are big business
and there might very well be potential clients from that industry out
there - who'd be glad to see that C
I like using valuelist(), but it messes up the display because it crunches the
list items together, no spaces after the comma.
So I tried this and it worked. Had no idea...
Just thought I'd post it in case anyone else ran into the same problem.
Will
> Let's just all use some common sense about this. We all know
> that there's a lot more sensibility over pornographic
> material than petunia growing...
I don't think anyone's complaining about petunia growing sites, so that's a
pretty disingenuous comparison on your part.
> I guess you're ope
Yes. LoveHoney is the site.
LINK NOT SAFE FOR WORK
LINK NOT SAFE FOR WORK
LINK NOT SAFE FOR WORK
http://www.lovehoney.co.uk/
Rey...
Jim Wright wrote:
> Rick Faircloth wrote:
>> Isn't anyone else doing anything worth noting?
>
> This was exactly my point...and the conversation should go to this
Rick Faircloth wrote:
> Isn't anyone else doing anything worth noting?
This was exactly my point...and the conversation should go to this and
how best to rate and showcase them rather than whether adult sites
should be included (which is, as far as we know, still
theoretical...Rey, have any bee
I'm sure that there are. I think the answer is to sort the site by topic.
IE: Business Sites, Entertainment, Adult.. etc. Rey's already said that he's
not allowing hate or illegal sites, so I think the KKK and NAMBLA their ilk
are taken care of.
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mai
But are porn sites the best we can offer prospective clients?
Isn't anyone else doing anything worth noting?
Take one officer of a corporation to the "adult toy shop"
on his office computer to show him how well CF works there,
and I'll guarantee he'll have a fit just because you visited
the site o
Rey's site is meant to evangelize CF...and one thing that will
evangelize CF is some really good CF sites. If someone is going in to
look at sites that use CF, I'd rather have them see a really well
designed adult toy shop that has a kick-ass search engine to help you
find that perfect lube th
>> You mean as a function in the same component?
>
>Perhaps, or perhaps as a function within another component - it really
>depends on what it's supposed to do.
Gotcha. Thanks for the input.
Janet
~|
Create Web Applications With
What about porn sites done in CF? *grin*
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Claude_Schnéegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 4:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Spam: Re: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site
>>I agree with Bruce and Liz below. I vote "NO"
BTW, I was inspired by your posting to do the following:
forum listing is now cached in the application scope, and updated only when
the data changes.. ie, new posts, new forums, deleted posts, etc...
Per forum message count and last post is now stored in the forums table,
eliminating the need fo
> You are right in that it seems simple, unfortunately, it's not as simple
> as it should be *grin*. In my research into this problem, I found
> several methods that either used to work or couldn't be implemented when
> using CFDocument.
Just as I expected, then.
> The only way I found to automag
> No it is not possible, you will always go through the print dialog box. The
> only way around this would be a custom active object that would directly
> bypass the print options dialog, and then you would need to support all the
> different printers then.
I am not trying to bypass the print dial
> > generally, this kind of logic is better written as a function
> > or a separate component in its own right.
>
> You mean as a function in the same component?
Perhaps, or perhaps as a function within another component - it really
depends on what it's supposed to do.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf
Good decision... That's the important thing about
the list. With all manner of site names around for the
porn industry, a client's sensibilities are bound to be
offended sooner or later. Why take the chance?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
Yes, it's a slippery slope, but rather than abandon
all concern for sensibilities, I think Rey can use some
discernment when it comes to inappropriate material,
be it racist, illegal, or pornographic.
Let's just all use some common sense about this. We all
know that there's a lot more sensibility
You want either...
qry_Query['#company#_visitdate']
Or...
qry_Query['#company#_visitdate'][RowNumber]
(Depending on context)
You could use this...
Evaluate("qry_Query.#company#_visitdate")
But I don't know anyone who would recommend that method.
> Hi,
>
> I want to output a dynamic column na
> Well, actually, this has nothing to do with JavaScript
The absense of seperate addition and concatenation operators in JavaScript is
nothing to do with JavaScript?
> Within an HTML form, fields contain string values.
Unless you do a*b or a-b, where it will convert the values to numbers.
In the
Hello CF Community:
A home theater design and installation firm in Toronto needs assistance in
building a small to medium sized database. They are working on a condominium
project where they need to track and manage inventory and technical details of
client Suites. They need someone to analyze
Hi,
I want to output a dynamic column name.
The example below doesn't work but I thought it might explain what I am trying
to do the easiest.
(this here sets the name of the column to be returned)
(this here returns the value from the database)
#columntooutput#
Thanks
Mark
~~~
>generally, this kind of logic is better written as a function or
>a separate component in its own right.
You mean as a function in the same component?
(And yes, re-writing the tags as separate components is the ultimate goal)
Janet
~~~
> I stil don't understand why they cannot simple .NET a version
> of ColdFusion just like New Atlanta did with BD.
They have probably decided that it would cost them more to support the
platform than they'd make from the port.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf
No it is not possible, you will always go through the print dialog box. The
only way around this would be a custom active object that would directly
bypass the print options dialog, and then you would need to support all the
different printers then.
One question I will ask though, is this an intra
> JavaScript has an annoying habit of treating numbers as strings.
Well, actually, this has nothing to do with JavaScript, and everything to do
with where your values come from.
Within an HTML form, fields contain string values. If you create a variable
in JavaScript, the value of that variable w
Jacob,
You are right in that it seems simple, unfortunately, it's not as simple
as it should be *grin*. In my research into this problem, I found
several methods that either used to work or couldn't be implemented when
using CFDocument. One that seems to work but can't be used from within
CFDocum
> Are you going to filter political or social sites as well?
Bingo! censorship/filtering is always a slippery slope
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Is it safe to call cfmodule from within a CFC stored in the
> application scope? I think the example below is safe because
> the custom tag only manipulates the caller's var scope. Can
> anybody see any other problems?
>
>
>
>returntype="MyComponent">
>
>
>
> We have been running 2 instances inside one cluster on each
> one of our BIG-IP load balanced servers. Each server has 4 GB
> of memory.
>
> With these new dual chip ââ¬â dual-core Dellââ¬â¢s we have been
> purchasing (like having 4 processors per physical server),
> was going to run
Hi Dave,
> A "porn ban" might filter out sites like tlavideo.com, which is a
> nicely-designed CF shopping cart that sells a wide variety of DVD titles,
> from the hoity-toity Criterion Collection to, well, all sorts of other stuff
> that I won't mention. So, you might want to be careful about you
Doesn't bother me either way, but if you're going to include them, you
shouldn't make such an issue out of them.
"All (Non-Adult Themed)" immediately makes one go 'huh?' and then selecting the
drop down and "Adult or Mature Themed (18 years or older required to view")
instantly jumps out, with i
Ok. I've given everyone time to digest this and its decision time. Steve
Milburn offered a voting link here:
http://64.193.88.101/vote/
and the votes are 15-6 in favor of *NOT* displaying any adult sites.
So I'm going to go with that and not display any sites that are adult in
nature. This inc
> However, porn sites are historically an industry that is the
> fastest to adopt new, cutting edge technology. Its a huge
> business market and I think that most business visitors will
> understand that there is a lot of money to be made there. So
> I would think that listing those sites under
I vote NO yet Im not opposed to Porn heh heh :) I was an adult webmaster
before Acacia Media tried to sue me for patent violations
_
~Eric
~|
Create Web Applications With ColdFusion MX7 & Flex 2.
Build powerful, scalable RIAs
Yeah, I got that part, but I think you're missing my point.
I'm sure all corporate managers are smart enough to realize
that any technology can be used for anything.
But it's quite one thing for your webmaster to be using it
to privately build your site... but it's another to be publicly
on a list
>>I agree with Bruce and Liz below. I vote "NO"
Count my vote too:
IMO people looking for CF sites are not interested in porn sites (at
least not for the time being)
and people looking for porn sites won't look in this list anyway.
~~
This seems simple, but I'm not sure if it's possible. I'm building
some forms that have a print option. I'm using CFDocument to dump the
contents to PDF, and then the user can print from there. Of course,
now they are asking if it's possible to send the PDF directly to their
browser's print dial
Are you talking about matching sections of text (copyright/plagerism issues)
Rough similarity (similar size, number of words)
Similar content groupings (word count, number of matches)
Whole phrase matching
On 3/5/07, Ben Doom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Similar" is a rather vague description.
> -Original Message-
> From: Eric Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 4:46 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Why does IE s*(k... let me count the ways.
>
> That was a real word?
>
> Eric
Nope. If I can't use it "Bookworm" then it's not a real word!
Jim Davis
That was a real word?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Mik Muller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 8:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Why does IE s*(k... let me count the ways.
>I wouldn't either. Not for the security reasons you mention, but because
>a GET signifies t
"Similar" is a rather vague description. Are you looking for overlap?
Length? Number of characters in the same location in each string?
Number of similar characters?
Soundex is a good start if what your are looking for is similarity in a
sounds-like or spell-check sense, but isn't very helpfu
>It is as long as it is thread safe...
>
>But to be honest I wouldn't do it.
I would rather not either. I have an old application with a lot of pre-mx code
and lots of cfmodule calls. Its going to take a while to convert it all to
cfcs.
> Once again, the issue is not the technology, but the association.
>
> And I'll wager that any corporation would attempt to get their
> name removed from a list which included pornography sites...
>
> Rick
Did you read my reply Rick??
All tech is "associated" (the association you refer to) with
It is as long as it is thread safe...
But to be honest I wouldn't do it.
On 3/6/07, Janet MacKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it safe to call cfmodule from within a CFC stored in the application
> scope? I think the example below is safe because the custom tag only
> manipulates the calle
I agree with Chris, and Josh with jQuery on AjaxCFC.
But for the record, you can go implement Ajax on CF with jQuery only.
AjaxCFC just includes several built-in features like better error handling
etc- to make life just a little bit better ;)...
> -Original Message-
> From: Josh Natha
"the fact that NAMBLA entails
underage boys makes it illegal,"
Apparently, it's not illegal to promote the idea of it, hence
their website.
And, yes, any corporation concerned about their image would
probably disassociate themselves from a technology which
would tarnish their corporate image.
Co
Try Soundex (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soundex). Its for names but may
get you started in the right direction.
~Max
On 3/5/07, Chris Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm looking for an algorithm that will take two pieces of text as input
> and return some comparison of those texts, and how
Oops! Should have said "I would not put my company on any
list they shared..." (Oh brother, not that quote will end up on
Google somewhere...)
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 4:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: GotCFM.com
sorry, but you said (and I quote):
"...that most (corporations) would immediately instruct their IT
departments to change their technology usage..."
which certainly seems to imply that they'd move off of CF, so I stand
by my rebuttal.
As far as your NAMBLA argument... the fact that NAMBLA entail
Other groups do it all the time... and it works!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Judah McAuley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 4:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site
Rick Faircloth wrote:
> I would have to respond tha
Once again, the issue is not the technology, but the association.
And I'll wager that any corporation would attempt to get their
name removed from a list which included pornography sites...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2
It seems to me (jumping in the pool neck deep) that you might solve this
simply by having a "moderated list" and an "unmoderated list" prefaced by a
content warning.
Considering the issue from "the ground up" however I'm not sure that any
"big long list" is all that useful.
(I've had a site like
How many of us would want to promote NAMBLA if they
used CF for their site? NAMBLA, in case you're not aware,
stands for "North American Man-Boy Love Association" and they
promote sexual relations between men and underage boys...
Don't know if they use CF or not, (not going to visit to find out,
Rick Faircloth wrote:
> I would have to respond that due to the sensitivity of corporations
> to their image, that most would immediately instruct their
> IT departments to change their technology usage rather than
> be associate with *any* industry which would negatively affect
> their image.
Bri
My argument is not that they would refuse the technology
because it's used by business they would rather not associate with...
I think they would *not* want to be posted on a site like Rey's
if they're going to be listed with porn sites.
It's the association, not the technology that's the issue...
>I would have to respond that due to the sensitivity of corporations
> to their image, that most would immediately instruct their
> IT departments to change their technology usage rather than
> be associate with *any* industry which would negatively affect
> their image.
LOLwell given that EVE
On 3/5/07, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would have to respond that due to the sensitivity of corporations
> to their image, that most would immediately instruct their
> IT departments to change their technology usage rather than
> be associate with *any* industry which would negati
Thank you Steve. I'll tally the results at the end of business and the
majority rules.
Rey
Steve Milburn wrote:
> Rey Bango wrote:
>> Okay, so we have 1 vote yes, 2 votes no.
>>
>> Rey...
>>
>>
> I quickly put a page together that you can use to vote if you'd like.
> It is a simple Yes or N
Of course not anyone who has ever been to youtube knows that "the
internet is for porn" not just Coldfusion.
> it wouldn't send the message "ColdFusion is for porn".
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
The most significant release
On 3/5/07, Rick Faircloth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My vote... No... many business owners would not want their sites and therefore
> their businesses associated with that industry. Unless you're trying
> to convince a porn purveyor to build his site in CF, I don't see any
> thing positive comin
> Once you've read up on how Ajax works, and you think you understand the
> concepts, I'd suggest using Rob Gonda's AjaxCFC.
I was just writing essentially the same email when the above posted.
+1 jQuery, +1 AjaxCFC
Super duper easy to get up and running.
-- Josh
~~
I would have to respond that due to the sensitivity of corporations
to their image, that most would immediately instruct their
IT departments to change their technology usage rather than
be associate with *any* industry which would negatively affect
their image.
A website is only a small part of t
I certainly do understand the desire to not have your clients name right
next to my clients name. The majority of our clients aren't sexuality
related and I wouldn't necessarily want their names next to our porn
client either.
However, porn sites are historically an industry that is the fastest
My vote... No... many business owners would not want their sites and
therefore
their businesses associated with that industry. Unless you're trying
to convince a porn purveyor to build his site in CF, I don't see any
thing positive coming out of a list of porn sites mixed in with more
"upstanding"
My vote... No... many business owners would not want their sites and therefore
their businesses associated with that industry. Unless you're trying
to convince a porn purveyor to build his site in CF, I don't see any
thing positive coming out of a list of porn sites mixed in with more
"upstanding"
I would recommend Spry. It is a -very- easy to use framework. I am
giving a preso on it this week at CFUnited Express. I also gave a
preso on it last week you can download and watch. (It was given at
11pm my time, so I sound a bit dumber than I normally do. ;)
On 3/5/07, Jim H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm looking for an algorithm that will take two pieces of text as input and
return some comparison of those texts, and how similar they are to one another.
Ideally I would like it to return a number which would indicate the level of
similarity, but I can probably work with just about anything.
Jim,
Once you've read up on how Ajax works, and you think you understand the
concepts, I'd suggest using Rob Gonda's AjaxCFC. He has two branches of
the code one works with a library called DWR (Direct Web Remoting) and
jQuery. I *highly* recommend using the jQuery branch. Not because the
Ajax
Rey Bango wrote:
> Okay, so we have 1 vote yes, 2 votes no.
>
> Rey...
>
>
I quickly put a page together that you can use to vote if you'd like.
It is a simple Yes or No form (sounds like that is what Rey wants at
this point). You can access the page at http://64.193.88.101/vote.
There are
I don't see the need for including porn. There are plenty of other examples
of CF working in a high volume scenario.I see this as an educational site.
Why have it become controversial over links to porn? Now the kid making a case
of CF in his high school class can't access the site becau
> Pattern is listed twice.
That was just a typo in the email. It's only once like it should be in
the code.
It's the CF Version I believe. So, looks like I'll just use a regular
textarea with javascript for validation.
> At 01:31 PM 3/5/2007, Les Mizzell wrote:
>> What's wrong with this?
>> Wo
Rey, I think I said this in an early post, but I'd rather not post adult
sites at all. So my vote is 'No'. Don't post 'em.
However, if the Yea's get it, then may I suggest that you post adult
themed site *without* a link to the site. Also if the domain name is
offensive, perhaps just a generic
Rey Bango wrote:
> Okay, so we have 1 vote yes, 2 votes no.
>
> Rey...
>
>
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/
Archive:
htt
I agree with Bruce and Liz below. I vote "NO"
-Randy
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Sorge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site
> Hmm. That is a good point that I obviously missed.
OH! Well done! :o)
Cheers,
Chris
Rey Bango wrote:
> I've added a dropdown which will allow visitors to choose sites by
> category. Also, the initial load of the list will exclude any mature or
> adult themed sites. You will need to explicitly select that category to
> view it.
>
> Rey
>
> Mark
We have 2 vote yes, 3 votes no.
~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2
Build sales & marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business. Upgrade now
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/
Mark, that's a great idea. Personally, I'd rather not list porn sites at
all, but I realize that I can't force my views on anyone. However, I
hadn't thought of my client's sites being listed amongst them... very
good reasoning. Well done. I'd be okay with a separate section. Rey?
What do you th
For what its worth, we have a couple of sites for a company that sells
porn dvds. They are really well done, high end content management
systems with a very sophisticated e-commerce setup, affiliate system,
search engine optimization, etc. The fact that they are selling porn
dvds is incidental.
Okay, so we have 1 vote yes, 2 votes no.
Rey...
~|
Macromedia ColdFusion MX7
Upgrade to MX7 & experience time-saving features, more productivity.
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/gr
Hmm. That is a good point that I obviously missed. Now that I think about
it, no matter how you spin it, you are going to be guilty of promoting porn
regardless of your intentions. I change my vote to no.
Thanks Liz.
On 3/5/07, Les Mizzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes or no to adult theme
I love mondays :)
The list is like watching Saturday Night Fights on Showtime LOL
~Eric
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex
> Yes or no to adult themed sites?
I'm going to say "No".
Not for moral issues, but because I'd have reservations about sending
some of the businesses I develop for to go look at a list that included
such sites. You suddenly end up with "sleazy by association".
Here are my two cents worth (and after my weekend Guard training, that is
about all I have left mentally, LOL) as well as my vote:
If you truly want to show what CF can do, then you should 1) put morality
aside regarding adult sites, and 2) still keep it within legal boundaries
(no pedophile stuff
No I havent seen that Error and we are running 7.0.2 on 2K3
~Eric
~|
ColdFusion MX7 by Adobe®
Dyncamically transform webcontent into Adobe PDF with new ColdFusion MX7.
Free Trial. http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion
Archi
haha. Great feedback Mik.
This is a site that I developed but I want everybody to feel good about
showing the list off.
So you guys tell me what you want. I'll put it up to a vote.
Yes or no to adult themed sites?
Majority rules. End of story.
Rey...
Mik Muller wrote:
> Rey,
>
> I would arg
I've added a dropdown which will allow visitors to choose sites by
category. Also, the initial load of the list will exclude any mature or
adult themed sites. You will need to explicitly select that category to
view it.
Rey
Mark A Kruger wrote:
> No prob :)
>
> -Original Message-
Is #total# one of the fields? I don't see anyplace where total is
created. Are you totaling one of the fields up? I think that you
can do ArraySum(fieldname).
--
Daniel Kessler
College of Health and Human Performance
University of Maryland
Suite 2387 Valley Drive
College Park, MD 20742-
Pattern is listed twice.
At 01:31 PM 3/5/2007, Les Mizzell wrote:
>What's wrong with this?
>Works fine locally. Out on the server, boom
>
> type="text"
> name="question"
> id="areaINPUT"
> validateat="onSubmit"
> validate="regular_expression"
> pattern="^[^<>`~/@\}$%:;)(_^{&*=|+]+
>>yes if your FTP is needed in the middle of the processing and it runs
once in a while the
transaction is one way to go. However, it would create some issues if it is
to be run like 10 times a second on a server.
However, do not count on the CFTRANSACTION to roll back any file
transfer in case
i think one of the easiest and most lightweight libraries to check out
would be JSMX (http://www.lalabird.com)
check out some of the samples on the site.
I think that'd be the "quick and easy" route to getting a "Hello
World" up and running.
Then I'd probably look into something like jQuery (whi
Rey,
I would argue that, while there's nothing wrong with a little nipple now and
then, those kinds of websites are an industry that isn't generally intermingled
with everything else. There's a reason such magazines are in a different
section of the cigar shop (in the back, under wraps).
I was
Jim,
Start with understanding the basics. I started with HeadStart Ajax and
moved on from there to reading up on the various frameworks available.
Also, be sure to pick up Ajax In Action which is another great book.
Rey...
Jim H wrote:
> Ok, I am a newbie to AJAX. Can anyone point me in the ri
Ok, I am a newbie to AJAX. Can anyone point me in the right direction for
tutorials/information on this?
Thanks!
-Jim H
~|
ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2
Build sales & marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business. Upgrade now
http
Anyone else had the same issue? Its strange that its fine under 7.0.1, but
throws errors after the upgrade to 7.0.2.
>I had this same error when I upgraded to 7.0.2. Running Windows 2003.
>
>I was unable to figure this out and I uninstalled 7.0.2 and went back to
>7.0.1.
>
>
>
>-Original
No prob :)
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 12:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: GotCFM.com - Need Opinion on Whether to Approve a Site
Absolutely. Thats the type of feedback that I was looking for.
Thanks Mark.
Rey
Mark A Kru
If you think your form data is secure because it's not in the url try
the FireFox Plug-In called Tamper Data.
Dave Watts wrote:
>>> Anybody who's a threat to your application's security is
>>> certainly aware of "view source".
>>>
>> And I am sure they would have access to other means suc
Absolutely. Thats the type of feedback that I was looking for.
Thanks Mark.
Rey
Mark A Kruger wrote:
> I would prefer a separate category or page for "adult" or "mature" themed
> sites. Here's my reasoning - posted in good humor and with no intent to
> flame or be flamed... (I forgot my asbestos
1 - 100 of 193 matches
Mail list logo
