> Unless someone tells me the code view doesn't change code - I will
> never run DW. Period. I believe someone earlier in the thread said
> that it was indeed fixed, but who would want to use an editor w/o
> knowing if it will muck with your code??
The problem with the XML's entities is now fixed
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, but if you KNOW that there is a 0.01% chance of DW messing with
> your code, that wouldn't worry you? I can just imagine the hours
> wasted trying to figure out why somehting isn't working and it turns
> out to be the
Not really. In the 4 or 5 years (or however many it is) That DW because
MM's IDE of choice for CF, I never had a problem that didn't involve the
WYSIWYG interface.
Eric
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 10:19 PM
/*To: CF-
How do you know with 100% certainty that some other editor is not going to
change the code on you in some odd ball case? I honestly think I have had
Notepad, if it was not this then it was some built-in editor on this Mac,
change a display character on me before, should I ban that from use and
labe
Ok, but if you KNOW that there is a 0.01% chance of DW messing with
your code, that wouldn't worry you? I can just imagine the hours
wasted trying to figure out why somehting isn't working and it turns
out to be the editor messing with the file.
Sorry - even if it is 1 in a 1000, or 1 in 1, I'
Yes, but if we ignore that it happens with very specific things and just
hound and hound on the fact that it happens then it is more fuel to the fire
against DW.
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Kay Smoljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROT
My problem with it appears to have been fixed in CS3 and is not repeatable
in CS4. And as I pointed out before my problem is so insanely rare to happen
to us that it is damn near not worth even mentioning.
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 31
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless someone tells me the code view doesn't change code - I will
> never run DW. Period. I believe someone earlier in the thread said
> that it was indeed fixed, but who would want to use an editor w/o
> knowing if it wi
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 11:20 AM, Les Mizzell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grab it and let Adobe know what you think...
>
Unless someone tells me the code view doesn't change code - I will
never run DW. Period. I believe someone earlier in the thread said
that it was indeed fixed, but who would wa
Yeah...and that was a major improvement. The separate windows kept me from
using DW prior to that.
Eric
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 8:52 PM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
/*
/*On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 6:10
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 6:10 AM, Eric Roberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The separate windows thing really bugged me...but then again I really
> dislike Macs too. It's one of the things I hate about gimp too, but
> unfortunately I am forced to use that.
DW has had a docked, full MDI since the MX
> It was your code. lol!
Not! :o)
Rick
> -Original Message-
> From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 6:36 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Feels kinda dumb to ask this, but...
>
> >Well, Mr. Smarty Pants, my initial tests with no radio input
>
I think this has something to do with the fact that I have
several cfincludes involved and while the page calling the
includes was getting refreshed, perhaps the includes were not when
changes were made.
But that doesn't seem right, because my assumption was that
if an included page is called, it'
Hi there,
I've been trying to experiment with ajaxCFC a bit but keep getting this strange
error and I'm not really sure what I've done wrong.
I'm using AJAXCFCs jQuery tools for this and in the script below I'm trying to
call a CFC which returns a query set.
$('#finance').ready(function(){
>Well, Mr. Smarty Pants, my initial tests with no radio input
>selected returned a variable, which I thought if shouldn't,
>but there it was in cfdump.
>
>But upon changing the value of the first radio input from "no"
>to "no, just looking", the radio input stopped showing up
>in cfdump if no value
Always the way, as soon as you post the question you find the solution
;) I will post it here for posterity.
>From my streaming host I was given the following information to work
with the JW media player:
file = rtmp.thestreamingserver.com/wizard/
id = {accountname}/{videoname} (no .flv extension
Whenever you are testing information on a website that is submitted by the
browser (client-side code not doing what was expected, yet you are SURE your
code is right)
clear your browser settings, close the browser, reopen the browser and then
reopen your page. If the 'weird' functionality still
The separate windows thing really bugged me...but then again I really
dislike Macs too. It's one of the things I hate about gimp too, but
unfortunately I am forced to use that.
Eric
/*-Original Message-
/*From: s. isaac dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 11:19
I'm just starting out with flex and trying to play video over rtmp.
I've been googling for *hours* with no joy.
Can it be done with mx:VideoDisplay?
Currently I am using the excellent JW media player @
http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=JW_FLV_Media_Player to play the
stream and I supply it with
Well, Mr. Smarty Pants, my initial tests with no radio input
selected returned a variable, which I thought if shouldn't,
but there it was in cfdump.
But upon changing the value of the first radio input from "no"
to "no, just looking", the radio input stopped showing up
in cfdump if no value was se
Basically, it seems my choices come down to something like this;
HOMESITE
PROS: sturdy and reliable
CONS: not being updated
ECLIPSE
PROS: free, lots of good features, nice functions for CF
CONS: buggy, doesn't handle large files, even critical bugs seem to take a LONG
time to get fixed
APTANA
P
Yeah, but until 5, I really wouldn't call it code view...
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Massimo Foti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 12:30 AM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
/*
/*> That was back when DW was a design tool and didn't have the code view.
/
I guess I assumed it was 7...
eric
/*-Original Message-
/*From: Massimo Foti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/*Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 12:27 AM
/*To: CF-Talk
/*Subject: Re: Best CF editor?
/*
/*> DW7 was better and DW8 was really nice...
/*
/*Ehmm... DW 7 actually never was :-)
/*They skip
> DW7 was better and DW8 was really nice...though as Ray pointed out...there
> was no SVN integration, which sucked.
There's a public beta of DW 9 out now, with some nice enhancements. A
work saving feature for me is a "related files" panel that clearly shows
any includes, imported files, blah,
> That was back when DW was a design tool and didn't have the code view. It
> also had the horrible Mac disembodied windows. We also were not happy with
> the first version of it after MM dropped CfStudio. It has improved greatly
> along the road to 8. I still wish they would make a version of
>I can't quite figure out a test for determining if no radio input
>has been selected...
What is a variable? (OUCH!)
:)
Will
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free
It is far more likely to share session variables than request
variables, so just focus on the session variable problem.
If you switch to using J2EE sessions, the problem might go away immediately.
If you are using traditional sessions, start logging cfide and cftoken
values and confirm that these v
> > The only thing I had in CFEclipse that I'd like to see in Dreamweaver is
> > the ability to get a list of methods in a CFC
>
> Available since 3 years on my website :-)
> http://www.massimocorner.com/dreamweaver/coldfusion/cf_function_nav.mxp
Thanks Massimo! Exactly what I was looking for. :)
Just do it the same way you would a checkbox. Radio buttons don't exist in
the scope unless one was selected either.
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
http://cf4em.com
-Original Message-
From: Rick Faircloth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 3
If at all possible, put the DB on a different machine.
Stick with 32 bit for now. 4 GB will be fine.
If you value your data and really want a reliable server, get ECC RAM.
AD (or any LDAP solution) is good for hundreds or thousands of users.
For 10 users it may be overkill.
On Sat, May 31, 2
Henry,
Your question is really broad and a lot of answers could be right. I would
buy based on cost. For less than 10 clients it is not going to matter a
great deal whether your RAM is one type or another. A 4GB windows server
(2003r2) should be fine - buy what you can afford. Heck, buy a desktop
Does anyone here have experience with Sybase?
I need to create a development environment that uses Sybase 10.0 as the
database but it's been ages since I touched anything Sybase (since 6.5). The
client has given me the unload files from the database but I'm unsure where
to go from there.
> I can't quite figure out a test for determining if no radio input
> has been selected
;) The same as a checkbox:
Dominic
--
Blog it up: http://fusion.dominicwatson.co.uk
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the m
It starts off as two double quotes next to one another, DW changes it to one
single double quote.
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Eric Roberts <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't do a lot of xml so I guess I never saw anything like that. Is that
> just 1 double quote or 2 single quotes? If
I can't quite figure out a test for determining if no radio input
has been selected...
Four radio inputs, none initially checked, all grouped by name.
Form submits back to the page it's on, so there will be a value for the input.
With a checkbox, I just check for its existence.
But what about a
hi,
we are based in the UK, does anyone know of anywhere we could go to fund out
the current market rates for coldfusion and mysql web application developers?
thanks
richard
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most impo
This may be of some help:
http://fusion.dominicwatson.co.uk/2008/03/xmlsearch-and-default-namespaces.html
My betterXml components. It is probably worth extending them and
creating a specific RSS application of the component.
Dominic
2008/5/31 Andy Matthews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> A followup to m
To all server experts...
My situation is that since the DB of choice is MS-SQL, I need a windows server
that host the CF8 (Standard), and MS-SQL Server 2005.
1. Which version of windows is appropriate for a CF & SQL server for a small
Intranet (< 10 clients)?
- Windows Server 2008?
- Windows
38 matches
Mail list logo
