To be fair to Adobe, two of the products you mentioned they killed off were
a result of the Macromedia purchase which led to them having duplicate
products (Dreamweaver vs. GoLive, Freehand vs. Illustrator, Fireworks vs.
ImageReady, etc.), so it made sense from a business standpoint to kill one
Damn Den. I love reading your posts. Thanks for the morning giggle.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 2:03 AM, denstar valliants...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Michael Grant wrote:
I can sleep, no worries mate.
The strength of your opinion belies that statement. You know
I know so much about marketing from my experience with small/midtier
companies in completely different lines of business that I can
accurately make a cost-benefit analysis without any background
information other than my own wild-ass guesses.
Well yours is certainly more jaded and much
I, for one, would like to acknowledge you for the entertainment value you
bring to this list. Thank you.
Jeff
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
I know so much about marketing from my experience with small/midtier
companies in completely different
You should see me dance.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Jeffrey Battershall jbattersh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I, for one, would like to acknowledge you for the entertainment value you
bring to this list. Thank you.
Jeff
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:47 AM, Michael Grant mgr...@modus.bz wrote:
Spectra did sell well. I don't have the sales #s but it was a good
seller - especially in Europe I believe. Allaire did not cancel it -
Macromedia did.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Scott Brady dsbr...@gmail.com wrote:
To be fair to Adobe, two of the products you mentioned they killed off
Yeah, it was Macromedia
MD
On 29 Jan 2011, at 14:59, Raymond Camden rcam...@gmail.com wrote:
Spectra did sell well. I don't have the sales #s but it was a good
seller - especially in Europe I believe. Allaire did not cancel it -
Macromedia did.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 7:14 AM, Scott
+1
-Original Message-
From: Michael Grant [mailto:mgr...@modus.bz]
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 7:39 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: ajax tutorials for form objects
I generally prefer to use JQuery over CF's built in stuff. I find it to be
more steamlined. Plus I think you can probably
So I'll say again that we must agree to disagree here sir. It's clear I'm
not swaying you in any way. And it seems clear you think I'm a fool. The
beauty of HOF is that's it's made of so many opinionated people.
I don't think you're a fool, I just disagree with you on this specific
issue. But
I look at is as more of a break dancing crew scenario: We battle each
other to push ourselves, so that we can go out there and form like
Voltron when battling the other crews (PHP, .NET, etc.).
It doesn't need to be contentious. Friendly competition is where it's at, yo.
This is not how
ColdFusion has been around for over 15 years and has survived two corporate
takeovers. That is a remarkable accomplishment considering how many other
products and technologies have not survived. ColdFusion must be doing
something right. I usually mention this point when asked about the future of
+1 to Rick's +1 to Michael's suggestion.
One of the great things about CF is the cfc's can automatically return
arrays in JSON format that jQuery can consume. Like so:
cffunction name=default returntype=Array returnformat=JSON
I can tell you first hand that formatting JSON by hand from a
On 1/29/2011 1:26 PM, denstar wrote:
Not /exactly/ infinitesimal, but it ain't no flood of newbs, neither.
that sample size is more or less useless to base the rest of your arguments on.
I don't know how much that has to do with the entrance of the open
source engines as viable
I have created a few video's to highlight some of these problems if anyone
is interested. Also I did a video on another problem I had with migrating
over to ColdFusion 9 as per a blog post I wrote. I did this video because I
got a bit of flak on that post, because one person in particular
14 matches
Mail list logo
