But isn't it a problem to use CFINVOKE with getters and setters? Wouldn't the
object be reinstantiated for every single method call? Am I wrong in assuming
this?
--Brad
>**untested**
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I don't use cfinvoke, so I may have the syntax a bit wrong...
>
>
>
>
>
>HTH
~
The fields on my form are the same as in my database so I was wanting to loop
over the form fields and populate the setters in a bean. So basically the
methods are dynamic. Here's what I've been trying but it doesn't work but it
does not work:
That makes sense. I appreciate everyones help.
>By moving the inside of the executionMode check, you're only
>executing it once. If you have it outside of that check, it executes on
>both executionMode=start and executionMode=end.
~~
Thanks Ray. That worked. The only problem now is I don't understand why.
Anyone care to fill me in on why this little shuffle around of code prevented
the double execution.
Thanks again,
ColdFused
>Remove the cfparam and move the cf_associate to the end portion of
>child. Here is my child.cfm
I've got a problem I've never run into before with nested custom tags. I'm
using nested paired tags:
...some text here
...more text
When I dump #ThisTag# all the AssocAttribs are doubled. I belive I'm taking
steps to prevent this but here is some code to look over:
I've got CF 8 set up on a Windows 2003 SP 2 box using IIS. I have three sites
running:
(1) Default C:\Inetpub\wwwroot
(2) Test C:\Sites\Test
(3) Stage C:\Sites\Stage
Sites 1 and 2 work fine. Site 3 challenges me for a username and password.
This I don't understand. Anonymous access is all
Thanks Matt & João. I appreciate your help.
>argumentCollection="#args#" returnvariable="methodResults"/>
>--
>
>João Fernandes
>
>http://www.onflexwithcf.org
>http://www.riapt.org
>Portugal Adobe User Group (http://aug.riapt.org)
~~~
I know using evaluate is a no-no, but I'm stumped on how to restate this line
of code:
Any help would be appreciated.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
It is really great software, but let me give you a word of caution. Nothing is
free.
You're sharing your website data with Google. This may not be a bad thing, but
if you are using AdWords--you might not want to share this information. I'm
not saying Google is doing anything wrong, but I'd b
Are you using the DevNet version of CF 7? That meta tag that it throws in can
really screw up a lot of things.
--Brad
> Thanks for the email Andrew. The CFML code IS identical. I have one of
> my developers reviewing how the client app uses the WSDL, and I guess
> its likely that it was writ
process can
lead to the problem.
I appreciate you looking into this for me.
Thanks,
Brad
> On 11/30/05, Brad Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's some partial code from both pages. Even though this code is
> very "watered down", I can get it to produce
Here's some partial code from both pages. Even though this code is very
"watered down", I can get it to produce the same type of problems as the full
application. All I have to do to get the form scope to disappear is to submit
this form without selecting either radio button. Even if you sele
t; valid) before the form is submitted.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brad Haas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 2:10 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Form Scope Problems
> >
> > I'm having a really hard time with
I'm having a really hard time with losing the form scope variables on CFMX 7.
I have a pretty simple form that posts to a CF page. The form contains a
couple of radio buttons and a select box. The select box name is dynamically
generated, but it shows correctly when I view the page source fro
14 matches
Mail list logo
