RE: COM/MTS NT/2000 AND CF 4 .vs CF 5

throwing their kitchen garbage at yoiu when you start posting VB code to the list : - ) -- Billy Cravens HR Web Development, Sabre [EMAIL PROTECTED] zCF Talk wrote: > I have a com object that I have created and tested on Windows 2000 using CF > v5b3. It works great. Awesome. > > So I r

COM/MTS NT/2000 AND CF 4 .vs CF 5

I have a com object that I have created and tested on Windows 2000 using CF v5b3. It works great. Awesome. So I recompile the object on a Windows NT box, and install it on the Windows NT server. ASP can access the object without a hitch, but in the following code snippit, the 'CFSET' fails wit

RE: slightly OT ADO vs DAO

Some observations about ADO and DAO - DAO uses double quotes, while ADO uses single quotes (many hours spent fixing this). - If you open a recordset which is the base table, DAO returns the column names in the order they are stored in access, while ADO sorts column names alphabetically (no known w

RequestTimeout

As best as I can tell, either you don't set a requesttimeout on your server in which case you'd better hope that you never get an infinite loop on a page, or you set a requesttimeout and you cripple your one or two files that might extend past the timeout period. As far as I can tell, there's no

Loading App Vars .vs. using Cached Queries

Has there been any debate as to whether or not to store lookup table information as application variables, or to use cached queries to retrieve that information? Common sense would dictate that application scope variables would use less space, but then you have to implement some shared memory spa