Re: (OT) Lindows was (commercial distributions of Linux)

sn't already out there). Eric From: Sean A Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: (OT) Lindows was (commercial distributions of Linux) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 10:40:20 -0800 On Sunday, Feb 16, 2003, at 06:35

Re: (OT) Lindows was (commercial distributions of Linux)

On 16/02/2003 2:08 PM, Dave Lyons wrote: > i have been looking at a few of the others > any recommendations? If you wish recommendations based on non-partisan, non-biased, overviews, visit this page and do some reading: . My personal bias is to stay away from Mandrak

Re: (OT) Lindows was (commercial distributions of Linux)

i have been looking at a few of the others any recommendations? Dave - Original Message - From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 1:40 PM Subject: Re: (OT) Lindows was (commercial distr

Re: (OT) Lindows was (commercial distributions of Linux)

On Sunday, Feb 16, 2003, at 06:35 US/Pacific, Peter Bagnato wrote: > LINUX will never survive if there is not a larger software base for it. IMO, that would depend on whether it's sweet spot is considered the server market or the desktop market. I think it's a perfectly viable server O/S already

RE: (OT) Lindows was (commercial distributions of Linux)

--Original Message- From: Eric Dawson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 9:18 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: (OT) Lindows was (commercial distributions of Linux) Well the discussion of the commercialization of linux certainly is topical (to listen and learn) for me. But cer

(OT) Lindows was (commercial distributions of Linux)

Well the discussion of the commercialization of linux certainly is topical (to listen and learn) for me. But certainly not cftalk topical. It seems to me that the missing ingredient (if any) for linux these days is the commercialization. From the discussion on this thread it seems apparent that