RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

Design To: CF-Talk Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 What are other people's views on this - how many people are using MX with no problems? You wrote I suggest the user

Re: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

Design To: CF-Talk Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 What are other people's views on this - how many people are using MX with no problems? You wrote I suggest the user with problems

[Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

What are other people's views on this - how many people are using MX with no problems? You wrote I suggest the user with problems with the server product, to uninstall it completely and revert to CF 5.0, until Macromedia gets its act together.While a lot was

Re: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

isn't done! - Original Message - From: Boldacious Web Design [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 | What are other people's views on this - how many people

Re: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

Might be easier to ask how many people are having serious problems with MX. Ken Boldacious Web Design wrote: What are other people's views on this - how many people are using MX with no problems? You wrote I suggest the user with problems with the

Re: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

CMFX has been running really well for us since the 6.1 release. No complaints about stability. Brook At 03:53 AM 11/4/2003, you wrote: What are other people's views on this - how many people are using MX with no problems? You wrote I suggest the user with

RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

So far it's been fine for me - no problems I can't trace to my own stupidity. Jim Davis -Original Message- From: Boldacious Web Design [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:54 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k

RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 So far it's been fine for me - no problems I can't trace to my own stupidity. Jim Davis -Original Message- From: Boldacious Web Design [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11

RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

Yeah and I've been using CF for 8 years now. Obviously over time you learn much more and need to adapt more. Important:This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to legal or parliamentary privilege.If

RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

You will love Oracle 10g then! Important:This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to legal or parliamentary privilege.If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any review,