s'all good man, i understand, but for internal applications on an
intranet, or even for external applications, maybe its just our
creative minds, wanting to be different...we just cant help it!
later
tw
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:01:39 -0500, Doug White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still feel that
I still feel that clients waste tons of money hiring developers who absolutely
refuse to code to standards, using best practices, instead putting in their own
individuality and customizations which contribute nothing to the performance of
the web site, and in fact take quite a bit away from its eff
t;index.bmw or home.bmw or whatever. They're actually cfm
>files, but I
>just want the extensions to appear differently.
>
>
>
> _
>
>From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:11 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: 6.1 and
iles, but I
just want the extensions to appear differently.
_
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 2:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6
Why on earth would you place the extra load on the server by making CF
handle
htm
D]> wrote:
>> > Why on earth would you place the extra load on the
>server by making CF handle
>> > htm files? I have seen this once before when a
>client wanted that set up on a
>> > shared server. IIS 6.0 handles htm files so much
>easier and with a lot less
>
or what if your server has absolutely NO .htm files? why not do it?
that is no reason not to do it.
tony
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
r and with a lot less
> > CPU load.
> >
> > Doug
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > From: Jeremy Bunton
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:41 PM
> > Subject: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6
> >
>
> Why on earth would you place the extra load on the server by
> making CF handle htm files?
So you can use forms-based authentication to restrict access to those files?
I agree that it shouldn't be done lightly, but there are legitimate uses for
it.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www
once before when a client wanted that set up on a
> shared server. IIS 6.0 handles htm files so much easier and with a lot less
> CPU load.
>
> Doug
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Jeremy Bunton
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:41 P
: Jeremy Bunton
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 12:41 PM
Subject: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6
Hello,
I am building a dev/test box with 2003 server and iis 6
running 6.1. The install seemed to go fine. I am moving
some sites over to the new machine and one has the .htm
up to the competition:
>http://www.coolfusion.com/imssecomparison.cfm
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: Jeremy Bunton
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 1:41 PM
> Subject: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am buildi
-- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Bunton
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 1:41 PM
Subject: 6.1 and 2003 server standard - iis 6
Hello,
I am building a dev/test box with 2003 server and iis 6
running 6.1. The install seemed to go fine. I am moving
some sites over to
Hello,
I am building a dev/test box with 2003 server and iis 6
running 6.1. The install seemed to go fine. I am moving
some sites over to the new machine and one has the .htm
extension mapped to be processed by CF. I did this on 2000
server but ccan't recall what i did and am sure it is
deifferent
13 matches
Mail list logo
