No... Simply just do a cfloop around your cfmail and use the spool attribute
and away you go.
I doubt you will have a problem with your isp, but if you do then you can
always ask them to filter your traffic through... But that is extreme case
gone bad, which I doubt will happen.
On 5/12/07, Joel
Do you see any fail-safe way around this to accomplish what I need to do? Or
is it rare enough that the vast majority of my clients will be unaffected?
Thanks
>It depends on their spam rules, some isp's spam filters can see it as a mass
>mailout and consider you as a spammer. Its very rare but
It depends on their spam rules, some isp's spam filters can see it as a mass
mailout and consider you as a spammer. Its very rare but it can happen...
Same as multiple email address in the fields can also be flagged as being
spam as well.
On 5/11/07, Joel Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> An
Andrew--
That is a very good point; I had not thought of that. Why would an ISP block
an email sent from a loop, if each "to:" field is unique and the cc: and bcc:
are blank?
Just curious, as I have very little knowledge of those issues.
Thanks!
>I would be doing a loop, and I would also ask
At the moment, I'm on Godaddy shared, so I'm not sure. However, I am going to
be going the dedicated route soon and will be using mx7.
>You don't need to delay the emails anymore... What version of CF are you
>using?
>
>
>On 5/11/07, Joel Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
~~~
You don't need to delay the emails anymore... What version of CF are you
using?
On 5/11/07, Joel Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jose--
>
> Thanks for the response. Creating a deliberate delay on the cfmail (with
> the udf you suggested), I assume, would be to keep the server from getting
I would be doing a loop, and I would also ask what version of CF if its
CFMX6+ then cfmail its ok to use. But god forbid, I wouldn't use more than
one email address for something like this in any one field To:, CC: or even
BCC:
The reason being and its very simple, you could be seen as a mass mail
Jose--
Thanks for the response. Creating a deliberate delay on the cfmail (with the
udf you suggested), I assume, would be to keep the server from getting
overloaded, correct?
As to the "heaviness" of the email, it would be extremely light, containing
only the text which the user has posted i
Hi Joel
This would no doubt cause some delay on your mail spool, I do recall that CF
used to have a limit of 40 on the cc/bcc fields but I think this was fixed
in version 5 upwards.
I guess you could test it and see what happens, say to a gmail account.
If you did go down the route of looping cf
I have a forum in which users can subscribe to particular threads. When other
users make replies, all users who are subscribed to the thread will receive an
email (basic stuff, I know).
My question is regarding what the best practice for handling this mailing
should be.
Currently, I am queryi
10 matches
Mail list logo
