RE: Another cflock question

2000-07-14 Thread paul smith
ROFL >you want your CFLOCK to be as short and quick as possible. -- Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/c

RE: Another cflock question

2000-07-14 Thread Dave Watts
> I'm sure this is a really really stupid question, but, what > would happen if you wrapped the whole template in CFLOCK? You'd increase the likelihood that the lock would interfere with another lock. CFLOCK essentially does something analogous to locking in a database. When you execute a complex

RE: Another cflock question

2000-07-14 Thread Bud
On 7/14/00, Raymond K. Camden penned: >It's OK, and in fact, it's better to use one CFLOCK wrap. As for a good >timeout, I always use 30, but have not heard of a 'good' figure. It probably >depends on your estimated load. OK, cool. That will save me a couple minutes anyway. :) I'm sure this is a

RE: Another cflock question

2000-07-14 Thread Raymond K. Camden
gt; Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 8:43 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Another cflock question > > > OK. I'm finally going back through the apps I've built and am going > to wrap all my cfset session. tags in locks. Question: > > If I have a block of tags, l

Another cflock question

2000-07-14 Thread Bud
OK. I'm finally going back through the apps I've built and am going to wrap all my cfset session. tags in locks. Question: If I have a block of tags, like so: Is it OK to wrap the whole block in a single cflock tag, or should each one be wrapped individually? Also, what's a good cflock

RE: Yet another CFLOCK question.......

2000-07-04 Thread Dennis Powers
totally misunderstanding something. Can you help this poor soul? Best Regards, Dennis Powers UXB Internet (203)879-2844 http://www.uxbinfo.com -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 3:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subjec

RE: Yet another CFLOCK question.......

2000-07-04 Thread Dave Watts
> I have an Application variable with info about the database > (DSNName, UserName etc). The variable is a struct and some > of the keys are structs themselfs. When i talk to the databse > i use a set of CustomTags, to witch i send the Application > varibel as an attribute. > > For example > >

RE: Yet another CFLOCK question.......

2000-06-28 Thread Frédéric LeMieux
Hi Ruben, If you turn on Full Checking in your CFAdmin, you will have to CFLOCK each APPLICATION, SERVER and SESSION Variables you try to access, either in read-only or exclusive. I talked to Allaire, and this is the good way to handle these variables (APP, SERVER and SESSION), since they are sh

Yet another CFLOCK question.......

2000-06-28 Thread Ruben Chadien
I have an Application variable with info about the database (DSNName , UserName etc). The variable is a struct and some of the keys are structs themselfs. When i talk to the databse i use a set of CustomTags, to witch i send the Application varibel as an attribute. For example Do i have to lo