Jim Davis wrote:
> Actually - if I remember correctly - CF Forums was never encrypted. So
> no matter what version you have you should be able to dig in.
I have looked it over a few times over the last years, but since
it was never released under an OSI approved Open Source license I
never rel
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 10:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Forum 2000
Help me out...are we talking about the following forum here???
http://www.cfcode.com/index.cfm/fuse/forumdetails.htm
Let me know...Ché
-Original Message-
From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [mailto
Help me out...are we talking about the following forum here???
http://www.cfcode.com/index.cfm/fuse/forumdetails.htm
Let me know...Ché
-Original Message-
From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 10:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Forum 2000
Yes but. it looks nice.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Wayne Lehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:35 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Forum 2000
Run, do not walk away from cfForums. It is a curse. It's one of the most
poorly written applica
2003 3:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Forum 2000
Actually - if I remember correctly - CF Forums was never encrypted. So
no matter what version you have you should be able to dig in.
My main issue with it is that the fundamental codebase for CF Forums was
begun with CF 2.0 and was maintained
eline. It was a fine piece of software 5 or six years ago, but
it's age is just too apparent now.
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 2:04 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF Forum 2000
Yes, maybe, and yes.
sages displaying in sub 100ms times with a single user, before
any db optimizations. Under load it did well...can't remember times
though.
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, October 17, 2003, 12:21:35 AM, you wrote:
RS> Hi all,
RS> Has anyone here implemented a high volume site usi
t;
>Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Precedence: bulk
>References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: CF Forum 2000
>To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="_NextPart
Hi all,
Has anyone here implemented a high volume site using CF FORUM 2000?
We have just inherited one, and am wondering how solid the code is.
Its a very busy forum, doing about 3 gigs of traffic per day, and its
started to show signs of breaking down, e.g. deadlock errors,
timeouts, "No
9 matches
Mail list logo
