o: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
You probably do indeed have it working but not natively. .NET is the
replacement for COM. COM has a different internal architecture from .NET and
thus they are not compatibility natively. That is why you have to use the
RCW which translates specific
Pty Ltd
Level 2/33 Bank Street
South Melbourne, Victoria, 3205
Phone: 03 9686 0485 - Fax: 03 9699 7976
_
From: Schuster, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 7 January 2004 12:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
You probably do indeed have it
Ltd
Level 2/33 Bank Street
South Melbourne, Victoria, 3205
Phone: 03 9686 0485 - Fax: 03 9699 7976
_
From: Schuster, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 7 January 2004 12:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
You probably do indeed have it working b
er, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
You probably do indeed have it working but not natively. .NET is the
replacement for COM. COM has a different internal architecture from .NET and
thus they are not com
ET (et al.)
Stephen E. Schuster
PeopleSoft Administrator
2000 Ashland Drive
Ashland, KY 41101
Office Phone 606.920.7447
Cell Phone 606.831.4590
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 7:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 a
.Net does support com, I have it working here now. Secondly I am creating
code that can be used by Windows Applications as well as ASP applications
and coldfusion applications that will share common business logic.
Blacknight does not support what I am trying to achive, so I am correct when
I say I
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 7:04 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
>
> Matt,
>
>
> How the hell do you think you know what I am doing...
>
>
> Were did I say I was creating a wrapper, I am developing a
> com object nothing more noth
: Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:51 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
Are you trying to use a COM wrapper for a .NET object? If so, I would
recommend skipping the pain that is the Java-COM bridge and instead use
Black Knight
(http://montarasoftware.com/go/9d58a59e-df02-1157-affb
- Fax: 03 9699 7976
_
From: Samuel R. Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
Can't give you a complete answer but a part of one.
It has something to do with interfaces. CFMX requires the IDis
Are you trying to use a COM wrapper for a .NET object? If so, I would
recommend skipping the pain that is the Java-COM bridge and instead use
Black Knight
(http://montarasoftware.com/go/9d58a59e-df02-1157-affb-e87c411e1c8f).
Matt Liotta
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
On
6:13 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
>
> Hoping someone can help me out here, trying to create a com
> object with Studio .Net 2003. Now I have built the solution
> and .Net tells me I can use it in any application and that it
> is registered. Howev
Level 2/33 Bank Street
South Melbourne, Victoria, 3205
Phone: 03 9686 0485 - Fax: 03 9699 7976
_
From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 January 2004 10:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF MX 6.1 and com objects
Hoping someone can help me out here, trying to create a
Hoping someone can help me out here, trying to create a com object with
Studio .Net 2003. Now I have built the solution and .Net tells me I can use
it in any application and that it is registered. However coldfusion can't
create the object, is there a special trick to get a com object to work
under
13 matches
Mail list logo
