CF test tracking

2007-06-15 Thread Tom Chiverton
Before I go off and write a new wheel, does anyone know of a CF/Flex-y solution that will allow users to enter a series of tests, then print out / email those tests (and any sub steps etc.) to give to someone else to perform and sign off ? -- Tom Chiverton Helping to elementarily engineer cross

RE: CF Test

2005-08-31 Thread Discover Antartica
Unfortunately, I would not be able to disclose the company name. My apologies. Brian Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>>Discover Antartica wrote: >> Here are some questions that a company asked a friend of mine during an interview. I just wanted to see if he answered them correctly. > Jochem wrot

Re: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Fred Urban
I'd swear they are as they look very familiar and probably have been on other tests I have seen. On 8/30/05, Brian Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you download the demo of CFMX Exam Buster 7.0 (which allows you to take > 1 > full test), you'll see: > - question #36 is the EXACT

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Brian Simmons
>>Discover Antartica wrote: >> Here are some questions that a company asked a friend of mine during an interview. I just wanted to see if he answered them correctly. > Jochem wrote: > So give us the his answers and I will tell you how he did without > spoiling the test results of future applicant

Re: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Charlie Griefer
On 8/30/05, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>yes, situations exists where you need the whole shebang. but > situations exist as well where you need just the count and nothing > more. See the part of my response that you quoted above. "If I need > -just- a count..." (emphasis on

Re: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Claude Schneegans
>>So how about those CF test questions... :) What was the question? ;-)) -- ___ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Re: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Claude Schneegans
>>I work with *large* amounts of queried financial data, both hosted locally and remotely and by implementing these idea's we've dropped our DB query times by 60%. IMHO, look at all your SELECT * queries, replace a couple of them with SELECT count() and another one with limits for the rows, and

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Kevin Aebig
disagree... Sincerely, Kevin -Original Message- From: Nick Han [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 30, 2005 1:09 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Test Kevin, how about this scenario? Select count(*) from users where lastname like 'smith%' Notify users that th

Re: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Claude Schneegans
>>yes, situations exists where you need the whole shebang. but situations exist as well where you need just the count and nothing more. See the part of my response that you quoted above. "If I need -just- a count..." (emphasis on -just- added) I completely agree with you, and I just gave such

Re: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Charlie Griefer
ok...so let's just try to summarize and put this issue to rest... there are times when select count(*) is appropriate. there are times when returning records is appropriate. kevin has not had a need to return just a count. fair enough. others have. fair enough. So how about those CF

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Nick Han
where lastname like 'smith%' -Original Message- From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:59 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Test One... I'm not laughing. Two... Exactly my point. I can't remember the last time I

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Nick Han
where lastname like 'smith%' -Original Message- From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:59 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Test One... I'm not laughing. Two... Exactly my point. I can't remember the last time I

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Kevin Aebig
One... I'm not laughing. Two... Exactly my point. I can't remember the last time I *only* needed a count. Cheers, Kevin -Original Message- From: Nick Han [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 30, 2005 12:45 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Test > Using a count mak

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
>> Using a count makes that query completely useless. It >> can't be reused, >>nor does it return anything of relevance. Which means its >>sole purpose > is >to bring back a single number... > What?! A dba will laugh his or her ass off if he/she > heard this. > Select count(*) from table versus

Re: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Charlie Griefer
On 8/30/05, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>If I just need a count, why would i want to return a recordset? > > A good example of this is when you want to display n records among > "total nb of records". > Some databases allow you to set limits on the records to be returned. > Fo

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Nick Han
select * from table makes a big difference when you have thousands of records, if all you need is a record count. -Original Message- From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 10:07 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Test Using a count makes that query comp

Re: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Claude Schneegans
>>If I just need a count, why would i want to return a recordset? A good example of this is when you want to display n records among "total nb of records". Some databases allow you to set limits on the records to be returned. For example in MySQL, in SELECT ... LIMIT 9, 20 will return only rows

Re: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Claude Schneegans
>>I'm not saying SELECT * is a better query, but I do believe it's smarter to roll multiple uses into a single result set. If you DO need all records in the same process anyway, you are right, but if not, a SELECT * means much more overhead on the server. Most database system keep the number o

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> I took issue with several of the questions, including this > one. > But if we want to be "logical" about it, the answer is > true. You may not get the results you expected, but the > action can take a query string. > I wonder how the test givers would take having their > questions corrected.

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Kevin Aebig
e... but it's how I work as I've proven it to myself. Cheers, Kevin -Original Message- From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 30, 2005 11:20 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF Test On 8/30/05, Kevin Aebig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Using a count mak

Re: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Charlie Griefer
o return a recordset? > -Original Message- > From: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: August 30, 2005 10:38 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF Test > > Kevin, > > This is not a pointless query > > > >SELECT Count(*) AS total >

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Kevin Aebig
PROTECTED] Sent: August 30, 2005 10:38 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF Test Kevin, This is not a pointless query SELECT Count(*) AS total FROM TestTable You would NOT want to select all the records in a table if all you wanted was the total. Otherwise you are

Re: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Discover Antartica wrote: > Here are some questions that a company asked a friend of mine during an > interview. I just wanted to see if he answered them correctly. So give us the his answers and I will tell you how he did without spoiling the test results of future applicants :) Jochem ~

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Ian Skinner
I took issue with several of the questions, including this one. But if we want to be "logical" about it, the answer is true. You may not get the results you expected, but the action can take a query string. I wonder how the test givers would take having their questions corrected. Would they

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Mark A Kruger
Kevin, This is not a pointless query SELECT Count(*) AS total FROM TestTable You would NOT want to select all the records in a table if all you wanted was the total. Otherwise you are bringing in the whole kit and caboodle and then just discarding the rows in f

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Ian Skinner
1) b first and then mapped drives (not listed as a answer) 2) a 3) e - None of the above. (b) would allow you to alias the resulting column to a simpler name, but it is not required. 4) d 5) e - None of the above as listed. It is possible to use (b) for a form of server side validation but

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Mark A Kruger
ced by the population of the form fields prior to the request. -mark -Original Message- From: Discover Antartica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 11:15 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF Test Here are some questions that a company asked a friend of mine during an intervi

RE: CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Kevin Aebig
e wrong... and I'm definitely not an authority. Cheers, Kevin -Original Message- From: Discover Antartica [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 30, 2005 10:15 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF Test Here are some questions that a company asked a friend of mine during an interview. I j

CF Test

2005-08-30 Thread Discover Antartica
Here are some questions that a company asked a friend of mine during an interview. I just wanted to see if he answered them correctly. Can someone say the answers. Just type like this to save time: 1. a 2. b 3. c etc. Here are the questions: 1) Which path is used in the template attr

RE: CF TEST

2000-09-21 Thread Robert Hinojosa
ames Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 12:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF TEST www.brainbench.com - Original Message - From: "Jim Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 21,

Re: CF TEST

2000-09-21 Thread James Smith
www.brainbench.com - Original Message - From: "Jim Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2000 5:41 PM Subject: CF TEST > Some one has a cf test to take on line and I can't remeber where it

Re: CF TEST

2000-09-21 Thread Michael Dinowitz
you might mean this: http://cfusion.coreactive.com/cf_test/ I haven't updated it in a long while. > Some one has a cf test to take on line and I can't remeber where it is at .. > Do any of you guy's or gal's know where it is. > > > > Jim Taylor > W

CF TEST

2000-09-21 Thread Jim Taylor
Some one has a cf test to take on line and I can't remeber where it is at .. Do any of you guy's or gal's know where it is. Jim Taylor Web Centric Central http://130.13.69.228 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Home Office: 480-496-0712 Cell Phone

RE: BrainBench CF Test

2000-03-27 Thread Eron Cohen
rk for these guys, I just like what they've done. -Original Message- From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 27, 2000 11:13 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: OT: BrainBench CF Test BrainBench is looking for some pros to help develop online tests for CF and

OT: BrainBench CF Test

2000-03-27 Thread Ken Wilson
BrainBench is looking for some pros to help develop online tests for CF and Homesite (amongst others). Seems to me this list is the place they should be looking for that talent so I thought I'd pass it along in case anyone has an interest. Looks like it's a short-term, paid position. Here's part