hanks and Merry Christmas everyone!
Alex
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:34:54 -0800, Sean A Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu :
> De: Sean A Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Data: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 18:34:54 -0800
> Para: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Assunto: Re: CFMX
> That's gives a little background about the two types of JVMs. As far as
> performance, you might find this link interesting:
>
> http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-1997/jw-12-volanomark.html
>
Benchmarks from 1997, for history buffs I suppose.
Aren't those OS/2 scores disappointing?
~~
Tuesday, December 24, 2002, 4:01:14 AM, you wrote:
>> That's gives a little background about the two types of JVMs. As far as
>> performance, you might find this link interesting:
>>
>> http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-1997/jw-12-volanomark.html
PH> "interesting"? geez thats darned shocki
Paul Hastings wrote:
>>They're comparing Java 1.0 to Java 1.1.
>>
>>
>shows you how much i know ;-)
>
>
>>So this comparison no longer applies, as CFMX runs on at least 1.3, and
>>even better on 1.4.
>>
>>
>yes i use 1.4.1 for its extra i18n stuff.
>
>
>>And those versions have improv
> They're comparing Java 1.0 to Java 1.1.
shows you how much i know ;-)
> So this comparison no longer applies, as CFMX runs on at least 1.3, and
> even better on 1.4.
yes i use 1.4.1 for its extra i18n stuff.
> And those versions have improved drastically compared to Java 1.1
in the same pr
Paul Hastings wrote:
>>That's gives a little background about the two types of JVMs. As far as
>>performance, you might find this link interesting:
>>
>>http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-1997/jw-12-volanomark.html
>>
>>
>
>"interesting"? geez thats darned shocking. ms's jvm beats sun's
> That's gives a little background about the two types of JVMs. As far as
> performance, you might find this link interesting:
>
> http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-12-1997/jw-12-volanomark.html
"interesting"? geez thats darned shocking. ms's jvm beats sun's on windows?
its 5 times faster? i s
On Monday, Dec 23, 2002, at 10:44 US/Pacific, Alex Hubner wrote:
> Thanks Rob, but what about the SUN's JVM? What should I use? Client or
> Server JVM? All JVM versions came with
> the two... AFAIN (in fact I've read) the "Client" is provided for
> development or GUI use, the "Server" is more
> s
t I'm not sure about it.
Does anybody have an advice about it?
Thanks!!
Alex
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:26:12 -0800, "Rob Rohan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu :
> De: "Rob Rohan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Data: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 09:26:12 -0800
> Para: CF-
a Est Potentia
-Original Message-
From: Alex Hubner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 6:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFMX / JVM
Hello friends,
What JVM should I use? Client or Server JVM? Which one is
faster/reliable/better for a production server? I've
notice
CTED]> escreveu :
> De: "Frank Mamone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Data: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 10:01:09 -0500
> Para: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Assunto: Re: CFMX / JVM
>
> Where would I point the Classpath?
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jesse Ho
>
>
>>>I dont think there is a written procedure..
>>>
>>>1. Downloads J2SE 1.4.0.
>>>2. Install.
>>>3. In the admin point JVM to new install java runtime(jre).
>>>4. Recycle CFMX service and u are good to go..
>>>
>>>Try this.. write a loop time code or some.. and run it under different
>>>
Where would I point the Classpath?
- Original Message -
From: "Jesse Houwing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 4:33 AM
Subject: Re: CFMX / JVM
> Joe Eugene wrote:
>
> >I dont think there
Joe Eugene wrote:
>I dont think there is a written procedure..
>
>1. Downloads J2SE 1.4.0.
>2. Install.
>3. In the admin point JVM to new install java runtime(jre).
>4. Recycle CFMX service and u are good to go..
>
>Try this.. write a loop time code or some.. and run it under different JVM's
>swti
Talk"
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:31 PM
> Subject: RE: CFMX / JVM
>
>
> > As an additional addendum to this. I would
> avoid anything higher then
> 1.4.0
> > as many on this list who have tried 1.4.1
> have had various issues.
> >
>
Where can I find the procedure to change the JVM used by CFMX?
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 2:31 PM
Subject: RE: CFMX / JVM
> As an additional addend
: CFMX / JVM
On Thursday, Dec 19, 2002, at 06:53 US/Pacific, Samuel R. Neff wrote:
> I don't think there is an official recommendation.
I think you're right because the question has been asked and gone
unanswered here before.
> I believe the IBM one
> is bundled with CFMX and
On Thursday, Dec 19, 2002, at 06:53 US/Pacific, Samuel R. Neff wrote:
> I don't think there is an official recommendation.
I think you're right because the question has been asked and gone
unanswered here before.
> I believe the IBM one
> is bundled with CFMX and many have reported problems with
I don't think there is an official recommendation. I believe the IBM one
is bundled with CFMX and many have reported problems with CFHTTP fixed only
by installing a new JVM--the SUN one in particular.
I've read reports that the BEA JVM, JRockit, is a lot faster than IBM & SUN
JVM. Also, CFMX
What JVM do Macromedia recommend to use for performance etc...? Is there
on? What does everyone else use?
(that said, I still cannot get my ColdFusion MX server to start at boot
time!)
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/c
20 matches
Mail list logo
