: RE: CFMX updater - service pack?
Oh, god I hate those things. They're always such a pain
to use on intranet's (especially where 'net access is
explicity forbidden.).
Give me a nice reliable (portable) service pack any day.
I agree that the patches should be available for separate
Subject: RE: CFMX updater - service pack?
It doesn't trigger any network connection. I thought this was weird. I was
expecting it to go off to the Macromedia site.
Oh well, so in reality it is a service pack...
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 17
It doesn't trigger any network connection. I thought this was
weird. I was expecting it to go off to the Macromedia site.
Oh well, so in reality it is a service pack...
I'm not sure about this entirely. I think it's possible that this updater
installed some sort of update program, in
- Original Message -
From: John Beynon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd say it was more or less an equivalent of Microsoft's Hot Fix Rollup
package - a series of fixes that didn't warrant a full service pack but
nevertheless important.
---
Well MM have stated that their
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 06:50 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
I'm not sure about this entirely. I think it's possible that this
updater
installed some sort of update program, in addition to the fixes that it
installed. I don't know how to invoke the updater, or even if there is
one,
It really sounds like an intelligent, well-thought-out concept
It sounds like a service pack with a different name.
Thomas Chiverton
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
Why is an updater like CFMX at a disadvantage when compared
to a service pack.
The service packs (MS Windows) I have installed all had a GUI
that operated similar to the updater. (Only you'd download 1
service pack only to find out it had another service pack as
a prerequisite)... My
Does anyone know the 'status' of the new CFMX updater? Does updater =
service pack? Or is this just a stop-gap until a service pack proper is
released?
- Gyrus
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
work: http://www.tengai.co.uk
play: http://www.norlonto.net
- PGP key available
PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development
Unix/Linux special guy
But I ned tacos! I need them or I will
explode! That happens to me sometimes! -GIR
-Original Message-
From: Gyrus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX updater
, 2002 2:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFMX updater - service pack?
From the Updated Faq on the website:
What is the Macromedia ColdFusion MX Product Updater?
The Macromedia ColdFusion MX Product Updater replaces the concept of a
service pack by providing an easy way to ensure you always
/coldfusion
|-Original Message-
|From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:57 PM
|To: CF-Talk
|Subject: RE: CFMX updater - service pack?
|
|
|Updated/updater
|
|Jesse Noller
|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Macromedia Server Development
|Unix
You can roll back. Release note shows you how.
- Original Message -
From: Stephenie Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:05 PM
Subject: RE: CFMX updater - service pack?
Is there a way to roll this back? Or is there pretty much
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 2:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX updater - service pack?
Does anyone know the 'status' of the new CFMX updater? Does updater =
service pack? Or is this just a stop-gap until a service pack proper
is
released?
- Gyrus
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002 14:55:05 -0400, in cf-talk you wrote:
What is the Macromedia ColdFusion MX Product Updater?
The Macromedia ColdFusion MX Product Updater replaces the concept of a service pack
by providing an easy way to ensure you always have access to the latest security,
stability, and
Oh, god I hate those things. They're always such a pain
to use on intranet's (especially where 'net access is
explicity forbidden.).
Give me a nice reliable (portable) service pack any day.
I agree that the patches should be available for separate download; some MM
folks here said that
Is that really an issue with server software?
Would the silent install option solve the problem if you have multiple
Developer versions deployed?
Does the license allow you to have multiple developer versions deployed?
Dick
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 01:00 PM, Lewis Sellers wrote:
Oh, god I hate those things. They're always such a pain
to use on intranet's (especially where 'net access is
explicity forbidden.).
Give me a nice reliable (portable) service pack any day.
Is that really an issue with server software?
Yes, it's a very common problem. A server
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 04:01 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
Yes, it's a very common problem. A server might be on an internal
network,
with no external access. Or, it may be configured to deny external
access
except when done to and/or through a specific port by a specific
- Original Message -
From: Dick Applebaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, humor me (I have no real server experience).
Why is an updater like CFMX at a disadvantage when compared to a
service pack.
---
Yeah, I've been watching this thread with curiosity - can someone
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 04:41 PM, Gyrus wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dick Applebaum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, humor me (I have no real server experience).
Why is an updater like CFMX at a disadvantage when compared to a
service pack.
---
Yeah,
20 matches
Mail list logo
