That's another question. What is the list of vulnerabilities CFFILE exposes?
best, paul
At 03:43 PM 1/31/03 -0500, you wrote:
Is a CFAS 5 solution securing CFFILE possible only
with Sandbox?
Yes, if by securing it you mean allowing people to use it only within their
own directories on a
paul smith wrote:
That's another question. What is the list of vulnerabilities CFFILE exposes?
File system access. The implications of file system access should be
described in the OS manual, but typically it means everything that is
bad all at once.
Jochem
But it's dang good advice. As the admin for cflib, you wouldn't believe
how many submissions we get for UDFs that mimic things CF already does -
simply because people don't bother to read the docs and see what CFML
can do.
yes sometimes a RTFM is apt.
I've always wondered if every mail that
, Custom Tags..
But it's dang good advice. As the admin for cflib, you wouldn't believe
how many submissions we get for UDFs that mimic things CF already does -
simply because people don't bother to read the docs and see what CFML
can do.
yes sometimes a RTFM is apt.
I've always wondered
, and communicate all changes to the core tag to
all developers so that they know what to look out for.
Pete
- Original Message -
From: Jim Gurfein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:05 PM
Subject: Custom Tags as Global Includes
Hi list... Need to turn
Hi list... Need to turn to you Gurus for some special help.
We're doing an application that will reside under multiple web domains.
Rather than having duplicated templates in all domain subdirectories, we
thought of using the customtags folder to store the templates and include
them in our
Subject: Custom Tags as Global Includes
Hi list... Need to turn to you Gurus for some special help.
We're doing an application that will reside under multiple web domains.
Rather than having duplicated templates in all domain subdirectories, we
thought of using the customtags folder to store
thing to watch for is that if the clients have any
access to the coldfusion code for their site, they could potentially drop a
custom tag with the same name in the local directory, which would override
your tag in the custom tags directory. If you were to place these tags in a
subdirectory
Is there are Custom tag that will document a projects dependencies,
specifically calls to custom tags?
At 11:30 AM 11/11/02 -0800, you wrote:
It seems to work for me, so I suspect the problem is your user record. I
say that because mine has become corrupted twice. The first time Sam Coe
(who
I want to develop some custom tags at home, but I do not have access to a CF
server. Is there a way (legally) that I can get a CF developer only version
(for Linux) without buying anything (and doesn't expire)? anybody have any
Links?
If not, I remember some one posting something about blue
mailto:doug;dwhite.ws
- Original Message -
From: Rob Rohan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 6:46 PM
Subject: Custom Tags
| I want to develop some custom tags at home, but I do not have access to a CF
| server
Is that right! Nice.
Thanks Doug, I'll try it
-Original Message-
From: Doug [mailto:doug;dwhite.ws]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Custom Tags
download the evaluation version - it is supposed to revert to a single user
developer after the
evaluation
: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Custom Tags
Is that right! Nice.
Thanks Doug, I'll try it
-Original Message-
From: Doug [mailto:doug;dwhite.ws]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Custom Tags
download the evaluation version
Thanks Vernon! Have a good day!
:)!
-Original Message-
From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:vviehe;macromedia.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Custom Tags
That's right! http://www.macromedia.com/software/trial
Vernon Viehe
ColdFusion Community Manager
Mobile: 0439 401 823
Facsimile: (02) 6213 7287
-Original Message-
From: Rob Rohan [mailto:rob;cardinalweb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 5 November 2002 12:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Custom Tags
Thanks Vernon! Have a good day!
:)!
-Original Message-
From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:vviehe
directory
I added the following directory as a Custom Tags Path in the CFMX
Admin:
C:\CFusionMX\MyCustomTags
in that folder:
mytag.cfm - has the text: MyCustomTags directory
I then run the page test.cfm and it works fine the first time. I then
rename the C:\CFusionMX\wwwroot\mytag.cfm
and disadvantage of using custom tags vs. CFC's or
Web Services?
Thank you in advance for everyone's expert opinion.
Jason
enjoy...
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/whitepapers/
-Original Message-
From: jason kufner [mailto:jasonkufner;rio.com]
Sent: 29 October 2001 16:57
To: CF-Talk
Subject: custom tags Vrs CFC vrs web services.
Good morning every one:
I am working with a client that's
Hi All,
Strange situation here, curious if others are seeing the same behavior.
I'm testing out the Custom Tags Path that you can now add in the CFMX Admin.
I have CFMX (stand-alone installation, developer edition) installed.
In the C:\CFusionMX\wwwroot directory I have:
test.cfm - simply has
ok, forget a CFC in .NET
how about a Custom Tag?
thanks.
..tony
Tony Weeg
Senior Web Developer
Information System Design
Navtrak, Inc.
Fleet Management Solutions
www.navtrak.net
410.548.2337
~|
Archives:
ok, forget a CFC in .NET
how about a Custom Tag?
No, to the best of my knowledge, right now if you want to use something
written in .NET, the .NET code has to expose itself as a web service.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
voice: (202) 797-5496
fax: (202) 797-5444
And the same with using CF in .NET.
In order for .NET to be able to see it, it have to be part of a Web
Service.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwatts;figleaf.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:24 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: custom tags .NET
ok, forget a CFC
well, I guess its just perplexing since .NET is really
just Visual C++ 7, and right now custom tags can be
written in C++ 6 right?
..tony
Tony Weeg
Senior Web Developer
Information System Design
Navtrak, Inc.
Fleet Management Solutions
www.navtrak.net
410.548.2337
-Original Message
Net is *not* just VC++ 7
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:tony;navtrak.net]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: custom tags .NET
well, I guess its just perplexing since .NET is really
just Visual C++ 7, and right now custom tags can be
written
Oh, now that you should be able to do. But I haven't done it so I don't
know
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:tony;navtrak.net]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: custom tags .NET
well, I guess its just perplexing since .NET is really
just
-
From: Clint Tredway [mailto:ctredway;fishermenstudios.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: custom tags .NET
Net is *not* just VC++ 7
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:tony;navtrak.net]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject
perplexing since .NET is really
TW just Visual C++ 7, and right now custom tags can be
TW written in C++ 6 right?
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com
In that sense you are correct and VC++7 should work just fine.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:tony;navtrak.net]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: custom tags .NET
I know its not just VC++7 but basically it's the next release of
Visual studio
I wonder how it would work with C#
I might try that next week. Play with the new .NET tools and CFX Tags. I
will report my findings :)
-Original Message-
From: Clint Tredway [mailto:ctredway;fishermenstudios.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: custom
:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: custom tags .NET
Good question, I've never touched the C++ cfx api, I'm not sure if
there is anything that would cause C++ .NET to not work, but
other than a web service, there is always cfexecute...
--
jon
mailto:jonhall;ozline.net
Friday, October 25, 2002, 1
]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: custom tags .NET
I wonder how it would work with C#
I might try that next week. Play with the new .NET tools and CFX Tags. I
will report my findings :)
-Original Message-
From: Clint Tredway [mailto:ctredway
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:cf-lists;king-nacho.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 18:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: custom tags .NET
I wonder how it would work with C#
I might try that next week. Play with the new .NET tools and CFX Tags. I
will report my findings
That is what I figure as well, but you never know until you try :)
-Original Message-
From: Mike Townend [mailto:mike;cfnews.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: custom tags .NET
Pretty much the same... From what I recall it just calls the method
Yes It would be possible to call a C++ CFX in .NET, you would have to
implement the abstract classes (CCFXRequest, CCFXStringSet, etc). Once you
had them implemented, you could then make Server Controls, or User Controls
in .NET that corresponded to the CFX tag, so that you could call the tag
from
well, I guess its just perplexing since .NET is really
just Visual C++ 7, and right now custom tags can be
written in C++ 6 right?
That's not true - .NET isn't just Visual C++ 7. While you can write .NET
assemblies with the Visual C++ compiler that comes with Visual Studio.NET
(if I recall
AFAIK, you can also write unmanged code that still takes advantage of
some of the new feature of the .NET Framework.
I could be 100% wrong here.
That's not true - .NET isn't just Visual C++ 7. While you can write
NET
assemblies with the Visual C++ compiler that comes with Visual
Studio.NET
Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:cf-lists;king-nacho.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 12:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: custom tags .NET
Oh, now that you should be able to do. But I haven't done it so I don't
know
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:tony;navtrak.net
off, and this is the stuff I do with my time off, (Fun
guy ain't I)
I am going to play around with it.
-Original Message-
From: Mark A. Kruger - CFG [mailto:mkruger;cfwebtools.com]
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 3:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: custom tags .NET
Nick,
If you
: www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus
Yahoo IM : morpheus
My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda
-Original Message-
From: Ciliotta, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 7:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: flash integration w/ cfml custom tags
Raymond
Raymond,
What is the name of the course?
Mario
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: flash integration w/ cfml custom tags
Ok, earlier this week we had a big discussion about the new course MACR
We are currently using CFX_iiPOP3 custom tag. It works OK, but sometimes it
doesn't work correctly with French letters in subject line and always does
not understand French letters in sender's name. Native CFPOP is even worse.
So we plan to switch to advPOP3 (by ASPFusion) which doesn't have such
So is there a separate list for 4.x questions now or did the whole list
upgrade? :O
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Cesana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 11:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Custom Tags and CFX
Does the 4.01 engine handle Custom Tags and CFX
don't really have any added debugging
features. However when you run custom tags you can see an exploded
debugging, and you can even get this to work in CF 4.01 by changing the
registry: http://www.cfdev.com/resources/discussion/messages.cfm/id/11
_
Pete
Does the 4.01 engine handle Custom Tags and CFX in the same manner as far as
thread handling goes? From my understanding a CFX would be a third party
request that CF passes off too, if there is no response back from that
request the processing thread is lost until the server is restarted
Ok, earlier this week we had a big discussion about the new course MACR
is offering. The course focuses on aspects of Flash that are relevant to
coder type folks. Ben Forta mentioned how he used Flash to easily create
a simple multi-select item where he could select an item on the left
side and
question,
what in particular is needed (if it's possible) to construct custom tags in
C++.net? Is there anything I should watch out for granted I haven't tried
that yet? Thanks!
Gregory Harris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Signup for the Fusion
You need the .NET runtimes and associated files to compile it successfully.
If you shoot me the code, I can compile it for you.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 11:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFX Custom tags
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 8:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFX Custom tags in Visual C++.net
You need the .NET runtimes and associated files to compile it successfully.
If you shoot me the code, I can compile it for you.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Gregory
Hello,
How can I get a #query.colunmname# variable to show up
in a custom tag where the query is taking place in the
callering template and not within the custom tag?
***FILE_ONE.CFM***calling template***
CFQUERY name=standard_market_ALL
datasource=#datasource#
Select *
To pass variables to custom tags, just send them in as attributes:
cf_tag query=#myQueryName#
You can refer to variables in the scope of the calling template from within
custom tags using caller.varName, but this makes the tag less modular.
Just pass in your query, structure, string, whatever
Can you call a custom tag from cfscript in MX if you use cfimport?
I need an example
Justin Hansen
--
Uhlig Communications
Systems Engineer
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
913-754-4273
--
CFIMPORT adds tag support w/ a name space which doesn't work in
cfscript. Ie, you can't do:
tagprefix:tagname()
However, you can call custom tags in cfscript if you use a work around.
You can easily design a CFFUNCTIOn based wrapper for your custom tag, or
write a generic Module UDF (I'm
Hi, everyone. The IT department in my company has told me that I can't put
custom tags in the installation directory (something to do with
multi-application environment, blah blah blah). In our installation, that
is the only place where it searches for the tags automatically. So
Technically custom tags are cfmodules, cept custom tags are global and
invoked by typing cfmodule... blah blah -- What you're doing is fine,
making a mapped directory and putting all of them inside and calling them
specifically by template (via cfmodule calls).
So, unless there's some reason
Cornillon, Matthieu wrote:
Hi, everyone. The IT department in my company has told me that I can't put
custom tags in the installation directory (something to do with
multi-application environment, blah blah blah). In our installation, that
is the only place where it searches for the tags
oi people!!
currently I've got a few scripts that generate stats from an ftp
server. I've got a couple custom tags that loop some files and
generate queries based on the contents.
My question after listening to Tim Buntel talk the other nite bout
cfc's would it be to my advantage to convert
I've got a few scripts that generate stats from an ftp
server. I've got a couple custom tags that loop some files and
generate queries based on the contents.
My question after listening to Tim Buntel talk the other nite bout
cfc's would it be to my advantage to convert the tags into a cfc
not.
Cheers
Stace
-Original Message-
From: Critz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 11:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFC's or custom tags or what?
oi people!!
currently I've got a few scripts that generate stats from an ftp
server. I've got a couple custom tags that loop
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 1:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Quick question on custom tags
Actually, you can..
cfmodule template=whatever
blah blah
/cfmodule
Works well.
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Rob Baxter wrote:
One problem
Are there any internal implemenation details which make
cfmodule faster than the cf_ syntax, or was this what you
were refering to? Just curious...
CFMODULE naturally runs faster than CF_, it's to do with the way it's
calling the custom tag
There are general issues with using CF_ and the
What about the (fusebox) cf_formurl2attributes.
-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 12:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: top 10 custom tags?
Hi all,
I'm finishing the completely rewritten ColdFusion MX for Dummies and
would
question on custom tags
Are there any internal implemenation details which make
cfmodule faster than the cf_ syntax, or was this what you
were refering to? Just curious...
CFMODULE naturally runs faster than CF_, it's to do with the way it's
calling the custom tag
There are general issues
question on custom tags)
Phillip,
I'm not sure what you mean by naturally faster due to the
way it's calling
the custom tag. Anyway, I got curious about this and rigged up a very
simple test. I wrote a simple custom tag which just displays
the current
time. The tag file is located
Thanks for the info Rob. I'd point out though that using CFModule will
allow developers to store their custom tags within a folder specific to
their application (kinda like encapsulating the app under one root
directory), without the need to have access to the CFAdmin. In cases where
we don't
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cf_ vs cfmodule (was: Quick question on custom tags)
Can I ask, which version of the server this is? In CF4 and 4.5, I know
it's true, not done extensive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|1 tag calls:
|CF_ = 15262 ms
|CFMODULE = 20509 ms
ok compare that to a UDF function or just including the the file as an
cfinclude and
you will see why OO is nice but plain old linear code is fast
lots of overhead with cfmodule
z
-BEGIN
, 2002 1:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cf_ vs cfmodule (was: Quick question on custom tags)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
|1 tag calls:
|CF_ = 15262 ms
|CFMODULE = 20509 ms
ok compare that to a UDF function or just including the the file as an
cfinclude and
you will see why OO
:
10,000 calls in 1833 ms, or about 9 times as fast as cfmodule!
/rob
-Original Message-
From: Zac Spitzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cf_ vs cfmodule (was: Quick question on custom tags)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
the udf was cfincluded within the timed block but outside of the loop.
/rob
-Original Message-
From: Won Lee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cf_ vs cfmodule (was: Quick question on custom tags)
How did you call the UDF
Can I ask, which version of the server this is? In CF4 and 4.5, I
know
it's true, not done extensive (only simple) testing on 5 and
not touched MX for this yet
Testing was done on W2K Pro/IIS/CF5.
OK, here's something VERY strange
I tested it on 4 servers, each different hardware,
If I'm reading this correctly, the ones where CF_ is slower is on Website
Pro.
OT: Is Website Pro even supported? What's the big hoopla about it? I
keep hearing about it, but ... I didn't see anything different than just
running Apache, etc.
~Todd
On Fri, 31 May 2002, Philip Arnold -
If I'm reading this correctly, the ones where CF_ is slower
is on Website Pro.
Not all the time - the 4.5 one is faster on WSP, but since it's CF doing
the work, how can WSP effect it?
OT: Is Website Pro even supported? What's the big hoopla about it? I
keep hearing about it, but ... I
Not all the time - the 4.5 one is faster on WSP, but since it's CF doing
the work, how can WSP effect it?
Depends if there's a bottle neck between WSP / CF doesn't it? Just
curious.
__
This list and all House of Fusion
Is it possible to call a custom tag that resides in a folder other than
the current folder.
I am using cf_cf_formurl2attributes but I would like to have one copy
residing in a commonfiles folder at root.
This would take something like ../cf_cf_formurl2attributes right? It
doesn't seem to work.
on custom tags
Is it possible to call a custom tag that resides in a folder other than
the current folder.
I am using cf_cf_formurl2attributes but I would like to have one copy
residing in a commonfiles folder at root.
This would take something like ../cf_cf_formurl2attributes right
Unless it's in the global custom tags directory, no.
The only other way is to call it via CFMODULE tag.
On Thu, 30 May 2002, Brian Eckerman wrote:
Is it possible to call a custom tag that resides in a folder other than
the current folder.
I am using cf_cf_formurl2attributes but I would
- Original Message -
From: Brian Eckerman
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:05 AM
Subject: Quick question on custom tags
Is it possible to call a custom tag that resides in a folder other than
the current folder.
I am using cf_cf_formurl2attributes but I
Put it in your custom tags directory on your server or use cfmodule.
-Original Message-
From: Brian Eckerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Quick question on custom tags
Is it possible to call a custom tag that resides in a folder
Is it possible to call a custom tag that resides in a folder
other than
the current folder.
I am using cf_cf_formurl2attributes but I would like to
have one copy
residing in a commonfiles folder at root.
This would take something like ../cf_cf_formurl2attributes
right? It doesn't seem
cfmodule template=
Anthony Petruzzi
Webmaster
954-321-4703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sheriff.org
-Original Message-
From: Brian Eckerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Quick question on custom tags
Is it possible to call
Use cfmodule to call it.Regards,
Eric J. Hoffman
Director of Internet Development
DataStream Connexion, LLC
(formerly Small Dog Design)
-Original Message-
From: Brian Eckerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Quick question on custom
:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Quick question on custom tags
cfmodule template=
Anthony Petruzzi
Webmaster
954-321-4703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sheriff.org
-Original Message-
From: Brian Eckerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject
Brian,
I am using cf_cf_formurl2attributes but I would like to have one copy
residing in a commonfiles folder at root.
This would take something like ../cf_cf_formurl2attributes right? It
doesn't seem to work.
If you've only got one copy of the tag in your custom tags directory
of the server logs).
/rob
-Original Message-
From: Eric J Hoffman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Quick question on custom tags
Use cfmodule to call it.Regards,
Eric J. Hoffman
Director of Internet Development
DataStream Connexion, LLC
If you have more than one copy then cfmodule
name=commonfiles.formurl2attributes will do the trick...
Whoops... meant to say...
where commonfiles is the directory under CustomTags where the file
formurl2attributes.cfm lives.
You can have multiple levels of directories by adding them with
Tel: +32 2 639 68 70
Fax: +32 2 639 68 99
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.lrt.be
-Original Message-
From: Rob Baxter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 30 mei 2002 17:47
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Quick question on custom tags
One problem with cfmodule is that you cannot take
you're right, I just poorly phrased my answer. What I meant was that you
lose the ability to take action between the start and end execution modes.
Because I don't think when you call cfmodule there is an end execution mode.
To me, the real benefit of having start/end tags in your custom tags
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 11:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Quick question on custom tags
Use cfmodule to call it.Regards,
Eric J. Hoffman
Director of Internet Development
DataStream Connexion, LLC
(formerly Small Dog Design)
-Original Message-
From: Brian Eckerman
mode in any
custom tag that has an end tag:
cf_foo.../cf_foo
cf_foo /
cfmodule template=foo.cfm.../cfmodule
cfmodule template=foo.cfm /
In addition, you can have whatever stuff you like between the start and end
tags in either case.
To me, the real benefit of having start/end tags in your custom
Giesenhagen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Quick question on custom tags
Rob,
You are incorrect, you can use the start stop ... cfmodule template =
../modules/custom_tag.cfmBlah Blah /cfmodule works just fine with the
execution modes.
Paul
What happens if in my custom tag I call another cfmodule
/cfmodule? Will the parser barf?
The only situation where you might have a problem is when you convert
something like this to CFMODULE:
cf_foo
cf_bar
/cf_foo
Of course, if you do this:
cfmodule template=foo.cfm
cfmodule
Ah, thanks guys. I wasn't aware you could have /cfmodule
tag. Good to know.
One question, and maybe this is what Pascal meant in his
original reply.
What happens if in my custom tag I call another cfmodule
/cfmodule?
Will the parser barf?
Nah, it works happily - in fact, CFMODULE is
: Quick question on custom tags
Use cfmodule to call it.Regards,
Eric J. Hoffman
Director of Internet Development
DataStream Connexion, LLC
(formerly Small Dog Design)
-Original Message-
From: Brian Eckerman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:05 AM
when you call cfmodule there is an end execution mode.
To me, the real benefit of having start/end tags in your custom tags is that
you can just embed content between them and then you have access to it in
the end execution mode of your tag. You lose this functionality when using
cfmodule
the
location of recently used custom tags, probably to address this very issue.
So presumably, subsequent calls using cf_ or cfmodule would perform the
same. Of course I have no idea on how long this cache persists or what it's
maximum size might be, so in general it's probably safe to say cfmodule
question on custom tags
Nah, it works happily - in fact, CFMODULE is faster than CF_ so it
should work better for you
Philip Arnold
Technical Director
Certified ColdFusion Developer
ASP Multimedia Limited
Switchboard: +44 (0)20 8680 8099
Fax: +44 (0)20 8686 7911
www.aspmedia.co.uk
Hi all,
I'm finishing the completely rewritten ColdFusion MX for Dummies and would love to get
some input on the top 10 custom tags. If you've got a favories, let me know which one
and why. You can email directly [EMAIL PROTECTED] or if there's enough interest,
I'll put up a poll :)
Thanks
cf_dump has to get no 1.=P
Nate Nielsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:09 AM
Subject: top 10 custom tags?
Hi all,
I'm finishing the completely rewritten
Yeah, but that's a regular tag now...
My fave is SiteObjects' editor component.
Pete
- Original Message -
From: Nate Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: top 10 custom tags?
cf_dump has to get no 1.=P
Nate
]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: Re: top 10 custom tags?
cf_dump has to get no 1.=P
Nate Nielsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 11:09 AM
401 - 500 of 652 matches
Mail list logo
