That's whats supposed to happen but was not. Strangely enough this problem
disappeared on its own after a reboot.
Brook
-Original Message-
From: UXB [mailto:denn...@uxbinternet.com]
Sent: July-07-11 11:21 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: RE: IIS 6.0 ignores default document and s
>> The problem is that IIS 6.0 is ignoring the default document (index.html)
In the IIS manager right click on the website in questions and select
properties then the Documents tab. Be sure to check "Enable Default Content
Page" then sort the list in the order you want IIS to
This is a problem I have ran into before. Last time, I re-installed IIS and
it did resolve it, but I don't want to do that again.
The problem is that IIS 6.0 is ignoring the default document (index.html)
and instead trying to load index.cfm and I am getting a CF error that the
templat
> Naming the Homepage Default.htm doesn't work it ends up going to the default
> website, If
> I name it anything else it works it does seem like an IIS issue.
I still don't understand the problem. If I click on either of the
links in your first post, they take me to two different sites. If I
ge
Naming the Homepage Default.htm doesn't work it ends up going to the default
website, If I name it anything else it works it does seem like an IIS issue.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic rel
December 29, 2008 2:33 PM
Subject: IIS 6.0 and Coldfusion 8
>I have multiple website running on a new server which isn't live yet.
> We are trying to test all functionality before rolling the new box into
> place which will eventually take the IP of the current box. The new box
&g
> I have multiple website running on a new server which isn't live yet.
> We are trying to test all functionality before rolling the new box into
> place which will eventually take the IP of the current box. The new box
> is coldfusion 8 which we also have .htm going through the coldfusion 8
> ru
I have multiple website running on a new server which isn't live yet.
We are trying to test all functionality before rolling the new box into
place which will eventually take the IP of the current box. The new box
is coldfusion 8 which we also have .htm going through the coldfusion 8
runtime whic
-Talk
Sent: Thu Nov 09 19:48:20 2006
Subject: RE: OT: IIS 6.0 Configuration
> You cannot have two different SSL sites n the same IP address
> as everything is encrypted by the SSL, even the hostname in
> the initial connection, so IIS cannot work out what site is
> being connect
> You cannot have two different SSL sites n the same IP address
> as everything is encrypted by the SSL, even the hostname in
> the initial connection, so IIS cannot work out what site is
> being connected to. You need to use differing IP addresses.
Actually, I'm pretty sure that IIS 6 does all
.vbs set /w3svc//SecureBindings
":443:www.domain.com"
and
cscript.exe adsutil.vbs set /w3svc//SecureBindings
":443:site2.domain.com"
This only applies to Windows Server 2003 running IIS 6.0. There is a whole
slew of other steps when d
Hi Mike,
you wrote:
> I realize this is off-topic, although the end result will be related to
> ColdFusion. I am having trouble getting two sites working on IIS. The
> server is running Windows Server 2003 Enterprise w/ SP1.
>
> I have two web sites setup:
>
> ... snip ...
>
> I need to have S
I realize this is off-topic, although the end result will be related to
ColdFusion. I am having trouble getting two sites working on IIS. The
server is running Windows Server 2003 Enterprise w/ SP1.
I have two web sites setup:
www.domain.com
Host Header: www.domain.com
IP: 10.100.20.11
TCP Po
t just acts like the file isn't there (404) when in
reality it is and you just need to add it to the config.
Mingo.
Steve LaBadie wrote:
> We are putting up a brand new web server and want to know if anyone has
> an opinion about upgrading to IIS 6.0. I am currently us
, July 31, 2006 12:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IIS 6.0
We've been running 6 with CFMX 7 now for around eight months with no
issues
whatsoever. I'm not up to speed with the new features of six, but
there's a
fair chunk of stuff in Windows 2003 that makes it a better option than
five.
ED]> wrote:
>
> We are putting up a brand new web server and want to know if anyone has
> an opinion about upgrading to IIS 6.0. I am currently using 5.1 on my
> development box.
>
>
>
> Steve LaBadie, Web Manager
> East Stroudsburg University
> 200 Prospect St.
&
IIS 6.0 has some great features like application pooling and process
recycling that can be really useful. If you're just using it as a web
server and not as an application server you'll get more limited benefit from
those features. But when running .NET applications (including but not
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Steve LaBadie
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Mon Jul 31 17:13:37 2006
Subject: IIS 6.0
We are putting up a brand new web server and want to know if anyone has
an opinion about upgrading to IIS 6.0. I am currently using 5.1 on my
devel
> We are putting up a brand new web server and want to know if
> anyone has an opinion about upgrading to IIS 6.0. I am
> currently using 5.1 on my development box.
IIS is an operating system component, and can't be upgraded without
upgrading your operating system itself. Sinc
: Monday, July 31, 2006 12:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IIS 6.0
Depends on what you mean upgrading. If you install Windows 2003 I don't
think you have the choice - it is 6 out of the box.
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1
our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Steve LaBadie
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Mon Jul 31 17:13:37 2006
Subject: IIS 6.0
We are putting up a brand new web server and want to know if anyone has
an opinion about upgrading to IIS 6.0. I am currently using 5.1 on my
We are putting up a brand new web server and want to know if anyone has
an opinion about upgrading to IIS 6.0. I am currently using 5.1 on my
development box.
Steve LaBadie, Web Manager
East Stroudsburg University
200 Prospect St.
East Stroudsburg, Pa 18301
570-422-3999
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-Talk
Subject: RE: IIS 6.0 security - serving EXE files
Have you applied IIS Lockdown tool?
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 December 2004 16:47
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IIS 6.0 security - serving EXE files
What is URLScan?
I'm pretty sure not =)
December 2004 16:26
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: OT: IIS 6.0 security - serving EXE files
>
> Okay, so a while back I had a problem with IIS 6.0 not serving .exe
> files by default. Instead of being friendly and saying "prohibited" it
> just gave a 404 error.
>
> I d
Okay, so a while back I had a problem with IIS 6.0 not serving .exe
files by default. Instead of being friendly and saying "prohibited" it
just gave a 404 error.
I don't remember how I fixed this, but I'm having the same problem with
MSP files.
Can someone remind
Have you applied IIS Lockdown tool?
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 December 2004 16:47
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IIS 6.0 security - serving EXE files
What is URLScan?
I'm pretty sure not =)
- Rick
Martin Parry wrote:
> It isn&#
It isn't URLScan interfering with it is it ?
Martin Parry
http://www.beetrootstreet.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 December 2004 16:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: IIS 6.0 security - serving EXE files
Okay, so a while back I had a problem
> A group of users are accessing one of our sites behind a
> firewall, and the said site has recently been moved to a cfmx
> server on IIS 6.
>
> They access through a 'SRP' server which sends all requests
> with a HTTP/1.0 header, but our new server does not seem to
> like this and responds w
Morning all,
A group of users are accessing one of our sites behind a firewall, and the said site has recently been moved to a cfmx server on IIS 6.
They access through a 'SRP' server which sends all requests with a HTTP/1.0 header, but our new server does not seem to like this and responds with
, I think)
Regards,
George
>Hi all,
>Has anyone here tried to change the metaBase.xml file in IIS 6.0 (Win
>server 2003) and lived to tell about it? I am trying to change the
>website unique identifiers in the metabase to much lower numbers than
>they are presently. A distributed
Hi all,
Has anyone here tried to change the metaBase.xml file in IIS 6.0 (Win
server 2003) and lived to tell about it? I am trying to change the
website unique identifiers in the metabase to much lower numbers than
they are presently. A distributed authentication ISAPI filter that
runs on the
31 matches
Mail list logo
