On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 05:24, Thomas Chiverton wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 Apr 2004 03:24 am, Rob wrote:
> > dh = new DefaultHandler("messages");
>
> Ahh ha, cheers to you both :-)
>
> Dick mentions it is more stright forward in synch. mode - I assume this
> applies to the gubbins around the code fo
On Wednesday 07 Apr 2004 03:24 am, Rob wrote:
> dh = new DefaultHandler("messages");
Ahh ha, cheers to you both :-)
Dick mentions it is more stright forward in synch. mode - I assume this
applies to the gubbins around the code for neuromancer, rather than to the
neuromancer stuff itself ?
:pla
> >On Apr 6, 2004, at 10:09 AM, Thomas Chiverton wrote:
> > In the chatdemo, what tells it to link the messages ThinArray
> > _javascript_
> > object, to the query returned byrobject.getMessages (that I can see
> > calls a
> > web service) ?
> On Tue, 2004-04-06 at 10:40, Dick Applebaum wrote:
Rob can answer this much better than I, but he is N/A.
So here goes
Keep in mind the chat is multi-threaded: where the messages are
retrieved and refreshed in a background thread; while the user may be
typing in a foreground thread.
// sets up a thin array object named message
var
On Tuesday 06 Apr 2004 16:10 pm, Dick Applebaum wrote:
> It is very much quicker!
:experiments
In the chatdemo, what tells it to link the messages ThinArray _javascript_
object, to the query returned byrobject.getMessages (that I can see calls a
web service) ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdF
Thomas
It is very much quicker!
When I originally got the idea for the thin array it was for an
application that had up to 5 selects related.
Rather than load them dynamically, as the user chooses, I preloaded the
entire set of data with the initial page load,
The time to download the thin ar
On Thursday 01 Apr 2004 17:33 pm, Dick Applebaum wrote:
> This Thin Array contains very little non-data overhead and can be sent
> to the client, quickly with minimal bandwidth usage (and very few
> processing cycles to serialize/de-serialize at either end) .
Do you have any idea how much quicker
I would think you could write t the service cfc to put a try block
around the db request with a timeout & then return an indication to the
client/consumer
Dich
On Apr 1, 2004, at 11:32 AM, Rob wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 11:27, Whittingham, P wrote:
> > what about if the web service does a
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 11:27, Whittingham, P wrote:
> what about if the web service does a query to a database on a different
> server then the web service server. The problem could be the web service
> box(down) or the db box(down). Isn't multi-tier environment just
> wonderful:)
Yeah that'
what about if the web service does a query to a database on a different server then the web service server. The problem could be the web service box(down) or the db box(down). Isn't multi-tier environment just wonderful:)
Pat
-Original Message-
From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 11:00, Rob wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 10:42, Whittingham, P wrote:
> > Dick or Rob,
> >
> > Does the PIA take inconsideration if the web service is down/network
> > problems?? Is there a timeout time/message if that occurs?
>
> At present it does not, but the headers
On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 10:42, Whittingham, P wrote:
> Dick or Rob,
>
> Does the PIA take inconsideration if the web service is down/network
> problems?? Is there a timeout time/message if that occurs?
At present it does not, but the headers are returned when the ws call is
made so you could ch
Dick or Rob,
Does the PIA take inconsideration if the web service is down/network problems?? Is there a timeout time/message if that occurs?
TIA,
Patrick Whittingham
United Space Alliance
AES - Data Warehouse
-Original Message-
From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: T
I have been playing with Rob Rohan's Neuromancer "system" since he
first posted several weeks ago.
Rob's system is much more than a chat app -- though a chat really shows
it off.
I wanted to do some PIA (Robs acronym for Poor Internet/Interface
Application) apps where data exchange speed be
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 04:59, Whittingham, P wrote:
> Rob,
>
> I like your code alot. Does it works with a cfm template?
You mean instead of a web service? I don't think it would becuase what
it does is makes a _javascript_ object that matches a web service, you
then use that javascritpt object
Rob,
I like your code alot. Does it works with a cfm template? If not, I could extend its capability. Do you think it could work a different web service (ie., .NET, Oracle)??
TIA,
Patrick Whittingham
United Space Alliance
-Original Message-
From: Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
thanks rob.
ill wait a bit to try again...
remoting with js and cf seems like the coolest thing ever known to
man...
well...apart from mammary glands and their hosts
tony
r e v o l u t i o n w e b d e s i g n
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.revolutionwebdesign.com
its only looks good to those who
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 15:19, Tony Weeg wrote:
> undownloaded-able ... 404
>
> or am I trying to fast?
My bad, you have to up load before people can download hehehe
> :) thanks rob...ive been dying
> to dive into this kinda thing...
email me if you's got questions
Cheers,
--
Rob <[EMAIL PROTECT
Tony
Rob stepped out -- he will fix in a few. go to ghat & see when
Dick
On Mar 30, 2004, at 3:19 PM, Tony Weeg wrote:
> undownloaded-able ... 404
>
> or am I trying to fast?
>
> :) thanks rob...ive been dying
> to dive into this kinda thing...
>
> tony
>
> r e v o l u t i o n w e b
undownloaded-able ... 404
or am I trying to fast?
:) thanks rob...ive been dying
to dive into this kinda thing...
tony
r e v o l u t i o n w e b d e s i g n
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.revolutionwebdesign.com
its only looks good to those who can see bad as well
-anonymous
-Original Messag
I have had a lot of people ask me for this so here you go. I decided to
release the source for the _javascript_ remoting libraries - dubbed
Neuromancer, as well as the sources for the _javascript_ chat demos (Dick
said he was OK with releasing his cfc). The newer HTML chat is pretty
cool if I do sa
21 matches
Mail list logo
