Thanks for sharing this. I'm wasn't aware.
Anyway, althought they produce slighty different code, there's no real
performance gain.
Thanks,
Fabio Terracini
Adam Churvis wrote:
>>Not anymore. Since MX version, cfscript and tag-based codes have the
>>same performance.
>>
>>
>
>Not true wi
> Not anymore. Since MX version, cfscript and tag-based codes have the
> same performance.
Not true with MX 6.0. If you looked at the Java source code generated by
tag-based code, every single line translated to a line of code inside its
very own do-while loop, but the same block of code implemen
On 5/13/05, Charles Heizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The concurrent traffic is not going to be more than 10 to 20 users at a
> time.
Then page caching and database tuning are probably going to have the
biggest impact.
> Are there any good docs that cover writing more efficient code?
Lots of d
Thanks to all who have replied.
I will take a look at the ColdFusion MX Coding Guidelines. Since I'm just
looking for a better user experience, I'm going to need to play with caching
ldap query results.
Thanks,
- Charles
On 5/13/05 1:50 PM, "Fabio Terracini" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not a
On 5/13/05, Mark A Kruger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are these the same coding standards that result in the current performance
> of their site?
If you read the appendix on performance you'll understand that the
little tweaks in there have, in my opinion, very little impact. As
others have said,
> Are there any good docs that cover writing more efficient code?
Sure. There are all sorts of things out there on this topic. However, we
would have to first clarify what we mean by "efficient". Do we mean faster?
Easier to write? Easier to maintain? If I'm using a high-level language like
CFML,
Are these the same coding standards that result in the current performance
of their site?
you wrote --
You might wanna look the ColdFusion MX Coding Guidelines that
Macromedia uses internally. This document is base for the one that comes
with ColdFusion 7. It's not compl
Not anymore. Since MX version, cfscript and tag-based codes have the
same performance.
You should make a Google search on "coldfusion performance". There are
several articles and blog posts on this subject and server performance.
You can also look at weblogs.macromedia.com.
You might wanna loo
On 5/13/05, Charles Heizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks,
> The concurrent traffic is not going to be more than 10 to 20 users at a
> time.
>
> Are there any good docs that cover writing more efficient code?
ugh, tons of them. Try a grad level Algorithms and Analysis text :)
Have yo
Thanks,
The concurrent traffic is not going to be more than 10 to 20 users at a
time.
Are there any good docs that cover writing more efficient code? I also
remember somebody saying that cfscript doing a function if faster than using
a cffunction tag. Is this true?
Thanks,
- Charles
On 5/13/05
On 5/13/05, Charles Heizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has done any performance testing to see if
> Linux/Apache is faster than Windows2003/IIS or should I use the J2EE config
> with JRUN to improve performance.
The answer is: it depends.
It depends entirely on what exa
Hello,
I'm looking to make my internal site as fast a possible running CFMX 7.
Right now I'm running CFMX7 on Linux in the Server configuration mode with
the Apache web configuration.
My main performance issue has to do with a set of LDAP tree controls which
are array based; and according to the d
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: site performance questions
> If you have to choose between more than a couple of items use CFSWITCH,
whi
> ch is a pretty straightforward case evaluation tool th
questions
sure
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: site performance questions
Just wait till I get a moment to finish it. :)
Actually, could you and anyone else who read it email me off list to
sure
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: site performance questions
Just wait till I get a moment to finish it. :)
Actually, could you and anyone else who read it email me off list to tell me
wow
thx for all the feedback. I guess I have some more reading to do.
-- glm
---
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain
confidential, pro
ch 04, 2002 2:33 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: site performance questions
>
>
>And if your not outputting data use CFSCRIPT. if statements and assignments
> are basically faster in CFSCRIPT (but case statements are slower).
>http://www.houseoffusion.com/docs/cfscript.htm
>(these do
Michael,
hey - thanks for that link. It's a great resource for cfscript.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: site performance questions
And if your not outputting data use CFS
This was covered here:
http://www.fusionauthority.com/alert/index.cfm?alertid=5#Tech2
I have a table of different comparison types and the times they took as well
as the reasoning behind each comparison type.
At 05:44 PM 3/4/02, you wrote:
>Found the following set of guidelines useful:
>
>> http
Found the following set of guidelines useful:
> http://www.fusionauthority.com/alert/index.cfm?alertid=9#Tech1
But - Michael or anyone else - can you explain the bit that says
"e. Use functions when doing TEXT comparisons in CFIF - Any time
you're doing a comparison between a TEXT value and any
destination!!"
>
>
>
>Doug Brown
>- Original Message -
>From: "Michael Dinowitz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 2:17 PM
>Subject: Re: site performance questions
>
>
round this list has said that iif() is SLOWER than
>cfif...
>
>> Not alot of performance issues, but you could consider using iif()
>> instead of a bunch of
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Doug Brown
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Gilb
Monday, March 04, 2002 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: site performance questions
> Or not as IIF() is a lot slower than plain CFIF. I'd rather have a
bunch of
> bulky CFIF statements on a page than have a smaller looking statement
that
> slows it down.
> http://www.fusionauthority.com/a
der using iif()
> instead of a bunch of
>
>
>
>
> Doug Brown
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gilbert Midonnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:41 PM
> Subject: site performance
04, 2002 2:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: site performance questions
Not alot of performance issues, but you could consider using iif()
instead of a bunch of
Doug Brown
- Original Message -
From: "Gilbert Midonnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[E
e issues, but you could consider using iif()
>instead of a bunch of
>
>
>
>
>Doug Brown
>- Original Message -
>From: "Gilbert Midonnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:41 PM
t" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:41 PM
> Subject: site performance questions
>
>
> > I'm redesigning a site and I have questions regarding how the use of
> > and affects performance.
&g
Not alot of performance issues, but you could consider using iif()
instead of a bunch of
Doug Brown
- Original Message -
From: "Gilbert Midonnet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 1:41 PM
Subject: si
I'm redesigning a site and I have questions regarding how the use of
and affects performance.
1. I have a drop-down navigation in a top frame. I would like to put the
graphics in the nav to change according to the section the user is in and am
wondering about how my alternatives affect load tim
On the Allaire site, they have a performance tuning article that mentions
the following registry settings under
HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Services\TCPIP\Parameters:
MaxUserPort - 0xfffe
TcpWindowSize - 65535
MaxFreeTcbs - 72000
MaxHashTableSize - 65536
TcpTimedWaitDelay - 60
Has anyone made
30 matches
Mail list logo
