I was hoping to present a "Flex" or Central presentation at the next meeting
on December 10. Of course I was one of the many not accepted to the beta and
the NDA would no doubt be problematic.
Instead I have chosed to present BlueDragon 6.1 (beta). We need to keep CFML
alive and BlueDragon will go
> Any chance of elaboration on that point? Main
> advantages/disadvantages?
>
That is an interesting question and partially why I brought it up. I'm
not sure that I know all the advantages and disadvantages. I could
certainly start listing things off the top of my head, but I don't know
that w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> >> ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
> >> chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
>
> Any chance of elaboration on that point? Main advantages/disadvantages?
The cost advantage is even large
Matt wrote:
>> ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
>> chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
Any chance of elaboration on that point? Main advantages/disadvantages?
-dc
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsu
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 13:56 pm, Matt Liotta wrote:
> > We're sorta roughly looking at it as a cheaper alternative than CFMX.
> choice and BlueDragon's strong showing as of 6.1 just made that choice
> a lot harder than it used to be by implemented much of CFMX.
:nods
That's one of the things that h
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 13:48 pm, John McCosker wrote:
> >>phone and fax numbers dumped where any spam bot can find them
> Just out of curriosity, why attach it then?
Which bit of 'required by company, yup' passed you by ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
em
Yep - and I have it installed. A stock version of OE doesn't detect sigs.
Regards,
Howie
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Chiverton
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 13:30 pm, Howie H
> We're sorta roughly looking at it as a cheaper alternative than CFMX.
>
While that is certainly one difference between BlueDragon and
ColdFusion, it isn't the only one. There are many other reasons to
chose BlueDragon over ColdFusion and vice versa. With the BlueDragon
6.1's availability aroun
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 13:30 pm, Howie Hamlin wrote:
> Hmmm...Outlook Express doesn't do that :)
have you seen OEQuoteFix ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BlueFinger Limited
Underwood Business Park
Wookey Hole Road, WELLS. BA5 1AF
>>phone and fax numbers dumped where any spam bot can find them
Just out of curriosity, why attach it then?
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 December 2003 13:10
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 13
Hmmm...Outlook Express doesn't do that :)
We all know how much you love MS email clients
--
Regards,
Howie
- Original Message -
From: Jochem van Dieten
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:24 AM
Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
"dash dash s
DURETTE, STEVEN J (AIT) wrote:
>
> What is the proper signature delimiter?
"dash dash space" on a line by itself. Mail clients should
discard that line and everything below it when quoting a message
in a reply.
Jochem
--
When you don't want to be surprised by the revolution
organize one you
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 13:10 pm, Tangorre, Michael wrote:
> Well you got me on that one I guess... what an email novice I must be.
>
> -Original Message-
Hmm, top quoting too :-)
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BlueFinger L
Jochem,
What is the proper signature delimiter?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
Tangorre, Michael wrote:
> Interesting considering some peo
Well you got me on that one I guess... what an email novice I must be.
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
Tangorre, Michael wrote:
> Interesting consider
Tangorre, Michael wrote:
> Interesting considering some people have 22 line signatures. :-)
Atleast they use a proper signature delimiter so the signature
isn't quoted in the reply :-)
Jochem
--
When you don't want to be surprised by the revolution
organize one yourself
- Loesje
[Todays
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 13:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> Would it kill people to trim the quoted emails down a little ?
>> Interesting considering some people have 22 line signatures. :-)
> Required by company no doubt..
Yup.
And i've told them it's shite.
And I've told them it's anti-neti
> I use switch/case tags and don't use Fusebox.
> Admittedly not very often but if logic dictates...
>
> Why is it bad to use them, is there a substantial overhead
> verses cfifs ?
>
> I must admit the one curious thing I have always though about
> Fusebox is that essentially boils down to a switc
< Would it kill people to trim the quoted emails down a little ?
< Not directed at just you Michael !
>> Interesting considering some people have 22 line signatures. :-)
Required by company no doubt..
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Interesting considering some people have 22 line signatures. :-)
< Would it kill people to trim the quoted emails down a little ?
< Not directed at just you Michael !
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
On Friday 05 Dec 2003 11:39 am, Tangorre, Michael wrote:
> [not a lot, but quoted everyone in full]
Would it kill people to trim the quoted emails down a little ?
Not directed at just you Michael !
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion Programmer
Tel: +44(0)1749 834997
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/case statment and I can't believe
that for a big app it's that efficient. imho
-Original Message-
From: Adam Wayne Lehman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 December 2003 20:25
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
Dear FuseBox Users,
No one uses cfcase/cfswit
04, 2003 4:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
Sorry. This whole thing seems a little backwoods to me. I'll admit I'm
superficial about this sort of thing, but I'm not about to use a
webserver from a company who has such a crappy site. The information
about th
On Thursday 04 Dec 2003 20:32 pm, Rick Root wrote:
> Looks to me like BlueDragon Server is a better "free" option for CFML.
> Heck, I'm probably gonna go with BlueDragon 6.1 JX when it is released
> rather than upgrading to CF 6.1 from 5.0 on my box...
We're sorta roughly looking at it as a cheape
T could do most, if not all, of what WSH does now - if it ran
that way.
Jim Davis
_
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
I agree. As I see it Coral is means to creating a deskt
http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
--
-Original Message-
From: Thane Sherrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
At 03:24 PM 12/4/03 -0500, Adam Wayne Lehman
ally I see it offering an option to accomodate a bad situation. It may
not be a good option, but it's one more than before.
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Marlon Moyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 20
AIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 3:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
At 03:24 PM 12/4/03 -0500, Adam Wayne Lehman wrote:
>Seriously though. they only support like 25 tags! You'd be better off
>just learning the ASP equivalents and calling it a day
Adam Wayne Lehman wrote:
> Sorry. This whole thing seems a little backwoods to me.
I am pretty much connected everywhere nowadays, so the whole
concept of a desktop server for localhost seems a bit weird to
me. The ubiquitous network is really around the corner from my
perspective.
It is pret
3:50 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
It seems to me that there are a lot of better alternativesphp,
asp.net, python, perl, etc. I guess I'm just trying to apply the old
rule "the right tool for the right job"
/slips on flameproof underwear
marlon
Th
ay, December 04, 2003 3:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
At 03:24 PM 12/4/03 -0500, Adam Wayne Lehman wrote:
>Seriously though. they only support like 25 tags! You'd be better off
>just learning the ASP equivalents and calling it a day!
24 by my count (I'm
th
> >Distance Education Division
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Dan Farmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:34 PM
> >To: CF-Talk
> >Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
> >
> >A the links seeme
, December 04, 2003 3:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
At 03:24 PM 12/4/03 -0500, Adam Wayne Lehman wrote:
>Seriously though. they only support like 25 tags! You'd be better off
>just learning the ASP equivalents and calling it a day!
24 by my count (I'm ignor
ort of thing, I think.
T
>
>Adam Wayne Lehman
>Web Systems Developer
>Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
>Distance Education Division
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Dan Farmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:34 PM
&g
Adam Wayne Lehman wrote:
> Seriously though. they only support like 25 tags! You'd be better off
> just learning the ASP equivalents and calling it a day!
I noticed that they had checkboxes next to all the tags in the tag
support listing... but I also noticed that they simply choose to NOT
menti
of Public Health
Distance Education Division
-Original Message-
From: Dan Farmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
A the links seemed to work for me as well. I kinda like the idea of
this...
>Fro
A the links seemed to work for me as well. I kinda like the idea of this...
>From: "Greg Luce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
>Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 11:36:44 -05
What doesn't work? I just bounced through it all and downloaded it.
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Robichaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
Chickens.
-Original Message-
From:
heh...
no, it was just that we were all amused by the misspellings and broken links : )
- Original Message -
From: Gabriel Robichaud
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:40 AM
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
They are back:
CORAL News
Thu, Dec, 4
m you!
-Original Message-
From: Tim Blair [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:16 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
> I think its been removed :)
Hmm, I just get a "directory listing denied" message now... We got
informed of
> I think its been removed :)
Hmm, I just get a "directory listing denied" message now... We got
informed of it's existence by someone sending us a message through the
contact form on our company site:
---8<
My name is Roger Samuel represen
Chickens.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:09 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
I think its been removed :)
On 4/12/03 3:04 pm, "Gabriel Robichaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
gt; Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:03 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
>
> I would like to try it, but none of the links work on the site ;)
>
> Tim Blair wrote:
>
>> > Morning,
>> >
>> > Has anyone seen this
wow... the site must be down, i was able to view it all this am.
Gabriel
-Original Message-
From: Clint Tredway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:03 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
I would like to try it, but none of the links work
I would like to try it, but none of the links work on the site ;)
Tim Blair wrote:
> Morning,
>
> Has anyone seen this before: http://www.pcaonline.com/coral/
>
> It's a new one on me...
>
> Tim.
>
> ---
> RAWNET LTD - Internet, New Media and eb
EMAIL PROTECTED]
410.548.2337
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
I think the fact that their engine requires each CF tag be on it's own line
is indicative of a structure pr
Yeah, true. And you can't beat the price. $150.
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
Yeah, I'm in agreement here with the downsides, howeve
> -Original Message-
> From: Samuel Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:45 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
>
> I think the fact that their engine requires each CF tag be on
> it's own line is indi
Yeah, I'm in agreement here with the downsides, however, lets be
encouraging. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Samuel Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Another CFML app server...
I think the fact that their engine req
app server...
Good point.
I like the idea. Lets see if they can do something with it.
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
Michael Dinowitz wrote
;m maintaining.
Sam
--
Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com
Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
--
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject:
Good point.
I like the idea. Lets see if they can do something with it.
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Another CFML app server...
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> T
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> They emailed me directly and we were going to talk. After some investigation, I
> found at least one major problem with it. All CF code has to be on its own line,
> one tag per line. I think that describes maybe 1 persons code in all the
> community.
ReplaceNoCase(templa
They emailed me directly and we were going to talk. After some investigation, I
found at least one major problem with it. All CF code has to be on its own line,
one tag per line. I think that describes maybe 1 persons code in all the
community. I'll interview them but they don't 'feel' like somethi
54 matches
Mail list logo
