Re: CF 5.0

2005-02-17 Thread Paul Roe
Thanks Al, I'm a goober after reading what you read I looked closer at my data and you were 100% right... sorry guys and thanks for the feedback. On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:51:51 -0500, Al Everett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Your results are consistent with your query, since you're sorting > call_dat

Re: CF 5.0

2005-02-17 Thread Al Everett
Your results are consistent with your query, since you're sorting call_date in descending order (DESC). Change DESC to ASC (or remove it altogether and you should be fine. On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:34:10 -0700, Paul Roe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey I'm having a problem I have data in a table tha

Re: CF 5.0

2005-02-17 Thread Rick Root
Rick Root wrote: > What kind of field is "call_time" ... if it's a char/varchar field, > you're SOL unless you convert it to a time field or use 24 hour time > formatted HH:MM:SS... Never mind, I'm st00pid ~| Logware (www.logwa

Re: CF 5.0

2005-02-17 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Paul Roe wrote: > > SELECT * FROM getMemberActivity ORDER BY call_date DESC,call_time DESC > > This returns data that looks like this : > 2005-02-16 00:00:00 9:38:00 > 2005-02-16 00:00:00 8:55:00 > 2005-02-16 00:00:00 8:34:00 > 2005-02-16 00:00:00 8:05:00 > 2005-02-16 00:00:00 8:04:00 >

RE: CF 5.0

2005-02-17 Thread Eric Creese
Try SELECT * FROM getMemberActivity ORDER BY call_date ,call_time DESC -Original Message- From: Paul Roe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 9:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF 5.0 Hey I'm having a problem I have data in a table that looks like this Call_Date 2005-0

Re: CF 5.0

2005-02-17 Thread Rick Root
What kind of field is "call_time" ... if it's a char/varchar field, you're SOL unless you convert it to a time field or use 24 hour time formatted HH:MM:SS... Paul Roe wrote: > Hey I'm having a problem I have data in a table that looks like this > > Call_Date > 2005-02-16 00:00:00 > > Call_Ti

Re: cf 5.0

2004-12-21 Thread Barney Boisvert
On *nix you use your init script. On Windows you restart the "ColdFusion Application Server" service in the services control panel. cheers, barneyb On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 14:01:25 -0500, Robert Orlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How do I stop/restart CF 5.0 server? > > Robert O. > -- Barney Bo

Re: cf 5.0

2004-12-21 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Control Panel > Services > and restart the services named CF ;-) Cheers Bryan Stevenson B.Comm. VP & Director of E-Commerce Development Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. phone: 250.480.0642 fax: 250.480.1264 cell: 250.920.8830 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.electricedgesystems.com ~~~

Re: cf 5.0

2004-12-21 Thread Jim Campbell
In Windows? You can go into your "Services" control panel (In the Administrative tools folder) and tell the various servers to restart. For Linux/Solaris, etc. you should (as root or a user with appropriate rights) be able to enter /opt/coldfusion/bin/stop and then /opt/coldfusion/bin/start.

RE: cf 5.0

2004-12-21 Thread Burns, John D
Restart the CF service. John Burns Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer AI-ES Aeronautics, Web Developer -Original Message- From: Robert Orlini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 2:01 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: cf 5.0 How do I stop/restart CF 5.0 server? Ro

RE: CF 5.0 and XP

2004-08-05 Thread E C list
Yes it did! Thank you.   -Original Message- From: Aaron DC   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 05,   2004 11:05 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF 5.0 and   XP This any   use? http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/tn17834.htm Aaron -   Original

Re: CF 5.0 and XP

2004-08-05 Thread Aaron DC
This any use? http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/tn17834.htm Aaron - Original Message - From: E C list To: CF-Talk Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 12:43 AM Subject: RE: CF 5.0 and XP Dave, or anyone, Do you have any other clues for me on this.  IIS can show me

RE: CF 5.0 and XP

2004-08-05 Thread E C list
do see .cfm mapped to c:\cfusion\bin\iscf.dll... I am not sure what else to look at though. Thanks!   -Original Message- From: E C list   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 8:46   PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF 5.0 and   XP Thanks Dave. The problem is that I am g

RE: CF 5.0 and XP

2004-08-04 Thread E C list
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:56 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF 5.0 and XP > Can someone confirm that ColdFusion 5.0 works alright on > Windows XP?  I am having some trouble getting it going and I > am wondering if it just doesn't work. It should work fine. However, if you&#x

Re: CF 5.0 and XP

2004-08-04 Thread Claude Schneegans
>>Can someone confirm that ColdFusion 5.0 works alright on Windows XP? It doesn't work: it rocks! ;--) -- ___ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Tha

RE: CF 5.0 and XP

2004-08-04 Thread Dave Watts
> Can someone confirm that ColdFusion 5.0 works alright on > Windows XP?  I am having some trouble getting it going and I > am wondering if it just doesn't work. It should work fine. However, if you're using IIS, you may have to configure it yourself rather than letting the CF install do it. Bas

Re: CF 5.0 CFMail Random Email Failures

2004-07-09 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Thursday 08 Jul 2004 17:06 pm, Kim Mayhall wrote: > Anyone have any ideas where to start looking to correct this problem? A tcpdump / ethereal dump of the port 25 traffic to the mail server :-) What happens if you just send to one at a time in the page ? -- Tom Chiverton Advanced ColdFusion

RE: CF 5.0 wwwroot

2004-06-30 Thread Joe Eugene
Thanks, figured it out. Joe   -Original Message-   From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:04 PM   To: CF-Talk   Subject: Re: CF 5.0 wwwroot   I assume this is IIS (from th wwwroot in your example).  IIS has mappings to .CFM files that are in the

Re: CF 5.0 wwwroot

2004-06-30 Thread Howie Hamlin
I assume this is IIS (from th wwwroot in your example).  IIS has mappings to .CFM files that are in the IIS MMC.  If you click on Home DIrectory and then Configuration you will see the mappings (.CFM should be mapped to ISCF.DLL).  If the setting is for the individual web sites and not global then

Re: CF 5.0 wwwroot

2004-06-30 Thread Claude Schneegans
>>How do you tell CF 5.0 to process another wwwroot? You don't tell CF, but your HTTP server. -- ___ REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Thanks. [To

RE: CF 5.0 Hogging Computer Services?

2004-06-11 Thread Nick Baker
Dave, Super! With the confidence gained from your input I tired various configurations. It is the following group that is gobbling up all of the resources. net start "ColdFusion Management Repository Server" net start "ColdFusion Management Service" net start "ColdFusion Monitoring Service" Wh

RE: CF 5.0 Hogging Computer Services?

2004-06-11 Thread Dave Watts
> My local CF is causing the local computer to perform like > molasses. Disabling all of the following reduce the performance > from saturation to a mere few percentage points. My guess is > that some of the CF services running may be unnecessary. > Following is a list that is in the startup ba

Re: CF 5.0 on Solaris/Oracle 8.1.7/Verity Indexing

2004-03-19 Thread bret
Yeah and at .5 FTE, I will be set for life. (cue the evil music) Muahahahahahahahahahahaha! -Bret (thoughtfully stroking the goatee on my chinny-chin-chin) Jerry Johnson wrote: > Repeat after me ... > > "Job Security" > > =) > > Glad you figured it out. > > Jerry Johnson > [Todays Threads

Re: CF 5.0 on Solaris/Oracle 8.1.7/Verity Indexing

2004-03-19 Thread Jerry Johnson
Repeat after me ... "Job Security" =) Glad you figured it out. Jerry Johnson [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Re: CF 5.0 on Solaris/Oracle 8.1.7/Verity Indexing

2004-03-19 Thread bret
I think I may have found the problem. What was supposed to be a Verity index of just the headlines, keywords, and subheads was converted to also index all of the content for each record at some point in time. So it's getting 1200 records, looping through each one, adding a keywords column to th

Re: CF 5.0 on Solaris/Oracle 8.1.7/Verity Indexing

2004-03-19 Thread Jerry Johnson
Bret, Is there enough hard disk space to hold 2 copies of the collection? How many unique records in the index? Are you indexing data from the Oracle db, or is a file-type collection? Are you running the K2 server or vdk collections? How are you indexing the collection (cfindex?) And a general q

Re: CF 5.0 vs. MX

2003-07-16 Thread Scott Brady
-- Original Message -- From: "Clark Baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >- what are the shortcomings of MX, if any? Probably my biggest complaint about MX is the error reporting. If you have an error in a file that's included in another file (for example, the line

RE: CF 5.0 vs. MX

2003-07-16 Thread Jim Davis
> -Original Message- > From: Clark Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:54 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CF 5.0 vs. MX > > I've been searching for days now and found bits and pieces of comparisons > on > specific issues and found a few reviews by reporters. Som

RE: CF 5.0 vs. MX

2003-07-16 Thread Barney Boisvert
responses inline --- Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer AudienceCentral [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice : 360.756.8080 x12 fax : 360.647.5351 www.audiencecentral.com > -Original Message- > From: Clark Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: None > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CF 5.0 vs. M

RE: CF 5.0 vs. MX

2003-07-16 Thread Matt Robertson
A major, free upgrade to CFMX has been publicly acknowledged as slated for release ''this summer'' (northern hemisphere summer :D). Further, nobody who is on the beta is able to say what it performs like due to NDA restrictions. However we have all heard a lot of poorly contained excitement and h

RE: CF 5.0 Admin switched to CF 4.5 Express Admin - how can I get bac k CF 5.0 Admin?

2003-03-03 Thread Dave Watts
> Our CF 5.0 development server was hit with > nimda. We are running CF 5.0 SP2. Since our > server guys ran the nimda fix, instead of > getting the CF 5.0 Administrator we get the > CF 4.5 Express Administrator! If I go to the > Version Info page in the CF 4.5 Express Admin > it shows the ver

Re: CF 5.0 / Japanese Language

2003-02-21 Thread Paul Hastings
> Would I need a language pack of any sort to work the different charactor > sets of the Japanese language. no, nothing like that exists. i *think* there was a localized japanese version. better off w/mx for i18n work. ~| Archive

RE: CF 5.0 certification - according to MMCP!

2002-11-15 Thread Andrew Tyrone
-Original Message- > From: Samuel Neff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:14 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF 5.0 certification - according to MMCP! > > > Food for thought.. Just because your CF5 cert is valid until Dec '03 > doesn't

RE: CF 5.0 certification - according to MMCP!

2002-11-15 Thread Samuel Neff
Food for thought.. Just because your CF5 cert is valid until Dec '03 doesn't mean you should wait to get CFMX certification. You have to think why you're getting the certification and realize that CF5 certification may have less value in some situations than a CFMX certification. ~

RE: CF 5.0 certification - according to MMCP!

2002-11-15 Thread Andrew Tyrone
; > Andres Leon > > -Original Message- > From: MMCP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 1:40 PM > To: Andres > Subject: RE: CF 5.0 certification > > > Dear Andres, > > Thank you for your email. > > Your certification for the Cold

Re: CF 5.0 certification(MM Web Interface)

2002-11-15 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Friday, Nov 15, 2002, at 08:10 US/Pacific, Joe Eugene wrote: > I would like to comment on MM's web Interface to Certified > Developers(CF or > Other). > http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?Id=19865&method=full > The current interface is useless..You could NOT even search for > deve

RE: CF 5.0 certification(MM Web Interface)

2002-11-15 Thread Joe Eugene
--Original Message- > From: Joe Eugene [mailto:jebmail@;earthlink.net] > Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:10 AM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CF 5.0 certification(MM Web > Interface) > > > Thanks Sean for making the info clear. > > I would like to comment on MM&

RE: CF 5.0 certification(MM Web Interface)

2002-11-15 Thread Samuel R. Neff
Bryan, Thanks for the link. The graphs are really interesting, but can be a bit misleading. For example, in Finland, all developers are Advanced certified. That sounds impressive that for all the CF developers in the country, not a single one scored below 80 on the test. It sounds less imp

Re: CF 5.0 certification(MM Web Interface)

2002-11-15 Thread Samuel R. Neff
I would certainly agree that an enhanced search interface would be a great asset. For example, list all developers within a specified radius of a certain zip code, or search by last name (regardless of level or version). For certified developers, it would also be very nice to be able to see wha

RE: CF 5.0 certification(MM Web Interface)

2002-11-15 Thread Bryan F. Hogan
ColdFusion MX Developer Digital Bay Media, Inc. 1-877-72DIGITAL -Original Message- From: Joe Eugene [mailto:jebmail@;earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 11:10 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF 5.0 certification(MM Web Interface) Thanks Sean

Re: CF 5.0 certification(MM Web Interface)

2002-11-15 Thread Joe Eugene
Thanks Sean for making the info clear. I would like to comment on MM's web Interface to Certified Developers(CF or Other). http://www.macromedia.com/v1/handlers/index.cfm?Id=19865&method=full The current interface is useless..You could NOT even search for developers by CITY/STATE/COUNTRY/Region e

Re: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-15 Thread Jeffry Houser
At 11:16 PM 11/14/2002 -0800, you wrote: >On Thursday, Nov 14, 2002, at 17:38 US/Pacific, Jeffry Houser wrote: > > I do not. However, it has been said ( I'm pretty sure over on the > > CFDJ > > list ) that all ColdFusion Certifications will be removed from the > > Macromedia Site in December. >

Re: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Thursday, Nov 14, 2002, at 17:38 US/Pacific, Jeffry Houser wrote: > I do not. However, it has been said ( I'm pretty sure over on the > CFDJ > list ) that all ColdFusion Certifications will be removed from the > Macromedia Site in December. You should be careful about perpetuating untrue ru

RE: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Simon Horwith
line) www.figleaf.com -Original Message- From: John Wilker [mailto:jtwilker@;earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 22:20 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF 5.0 certification I don't know that any MX study guides are out yet. I think Ben is working on his. Not sure if Syngress is planning a

RE: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread John Wilker
er is wrong it is better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick. Unless of course you just got poked in the eye with a sharp stick. -Original Message- From: David Notik [mailto:dave@;digital202.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:43 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF 5.0 certification

Re: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Jeffry Houser
At 03:02 PM 11/14/2002 -0800, you wrote: >At 12:59 PM 11/14/2, Jeffry Houser wrote: > > All the CF5 names will be taken off the site in December. > >Hmm, I know that certifications which have *already* been retired will stay >on the website until the middle of next year, so I imagine >soon-to-be-re

RE: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Mike Chambers
Notik [mailto:dave@;digital202.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 7:43 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF 5.0 certification > > > And Sean, do you know of a good place to find study materials > for the MX > exam (I'm taking it next week)?

RE: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread David Notik
) 575-1717 Mobile: (206) 351-3948 ### -Original Message- From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:sean@;corfield.org] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 4:38 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF 5.0 certification On Thursday, Nov 14, 2002, at 12:59 US/Pacific, Jeffry Houser wrote: > Beats

Re: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Thursday, Nov 14, 2002, at 12:59 US/Pacific, Jeffry Houser wrote: > Beats me, but that is what is happening. All the CF5 names will be > taken > off the site in December. This has been said on this list (or the CFDJ > list) in the past, but I don't know if that information is available > any

RE: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Mike Chambers
eb.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 6:44 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CF 5.0 certification > > > Howdy Andres, > > Thursday, November 14, 2002, 2:42:04 PM, Andres wrote: > > > Actually, the question i have is this: Looks like this exam will be > &g

Re: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Chris Montgomery
Howdy Andres, Thursday, November 14, 2002, 2:42:04 PM, Andres wrote: > Actually, the question i have is this: Looks like this exam will be > retired at the end of this year. Does this mean that the actual > certification also expire? or does it just mean that after 12/31/02 if > you want to becom

RE: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Andrew Tyrone
> -Original Message- > From: Andres [mailto:Andres@;vitacost.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 3:42 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: CF 5.0 certification > Actually, the question i have is this: Looks like this exam will > be retired at the end of this year. Does this mean that the > actu

Re: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread John Dowdell
At 12:59 PM 11/14/2, Jeffry Houser wrote: > All the CF5 names will be taken off the site in December. Hmm, I know that certifications which have *already* been retired will stay on the website until the middle of next year, so I imagine soon-to-be-retired certifications will have a much later expi

RE: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Andres
You must take it at an official VUE location. Go to http://www.vue.com. -Original Message- From: Thane Sherrington [mailto:tsherr@;auracom.com] Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 3:58 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF 5.0 certification At 03:42 PM 11/14/02 -0500, Andres wrote: >I recen

Re: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Thane Sherrington
At 03:42 PM 11/14/02 -0500, Andres wrote: >I recently took the MM CF5.0 certification exam, and to my huge amazement, >actually passed the thing :) To my even greater surprise, they actually >told me i scored enough to be "advanced"... guess my $50 bill under the >table actually worked :) >just

RE: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Ken Wilson
>...will i still be certifiable after the exam I believe that would be between you and your psychiatrist to determine. :) ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoff

Re: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Jeffry Houser
Yes, the certification will expire, you probably should have taken the CFMX exam. It is frustrating that the certification will expire, but that is the case. Has CF5 changed? No, it hasn't. Why should my certification expire? Beats me, but that is what is happening. All the CF5 names wil

RE: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Simon Horwith
on MX Developer Fig Leaf Software 1400 16th St NW, # 220 Washington DC 20036 202.797.6570 (direct line) www.figleaf.com -Original Message- From: Jim Davis [mailto:jim@;depressedpress.com] Sent: Thursday, 14 November, 2002 3:56 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF 5.0 certification > Hell

RE: CF 5.0 certification

2002-11-14 Thread Jim Davis
> Hello Everyone, > > I recently took the MM CF5.0 certification exam, and to my > huge amazement, actually passed the thing :) To my even > greater surprise, they actually told me i scored enough to be > "advanced"... guess my $50 bill under the table actually worked :) > > just kidding... it

RE: CF 5.0 Pro returns false 404 not found errors

2002-09-12 Thread Kwang Suh
Hmm... I wonder if clients are going through a proxy server and using IE... I used to get a ton of 404s at work, and once I turned on "Use HTTP1.1 through proxy servers" in IE, all was well. > -Original Message- > From: Peter Mott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, September 12,

RE: CF 5.0 and CFMX at the same time?

2002-09-03 Thread Darren Forcier
Brian, You can run them simultaneously, but you have to run CFMX on a different port using it's own built-in web server. When you install CFMX it asks you if you want to run under IIS or whatever other webserver you have installed or run standalone. Choose the standalone. The default port is 8

Re: CF 5.0 and CFMX at the same time?

2002-09-03 Thread Critter
oi Brian!! lookin forward to the next version mate ;) you "should" be given the option at installation, whether or not you want it to run as a standalone( port 8500). Choosing standalone will enable them to run side by side... -- Critz Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusi

RE: CF 5.0 Licensing

2002-08-14 Thread Mike Byers
. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:53 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF 5.0 Licensing > Hello All: > I was wondering, if one wants to install CF 5.0 on another server, how is > this handled, licenese-wise? We are not ready to migrate to MX yet and a

Re: CF 5.0 Licensing

2002-08-14 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> Hello All: > I was wondering, if one wants to install CF 5.0 on another server, how is > this handled, licenese-wise? We are not ready to migrate to MX yet and a > client needs another license. They already have the install disks, so the > software is not an issue. > Can they purchase an MX

RE: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit

2002-01-14 Thread Sean McCarthy
>From what I have read... yes you will -Original Message- From: David Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:29 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit > Do I need to create a scheduled task "autoupdateindex.cfm" and us

RE: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit

2002-01-14 Thread Dave Watts
> Do I need to create a scheduled task "autoupdateindex.cfm" > and use the tag to update the verity collections > I have as we add new doc's and so on or will verity collection > auto update as we add new doc's and pdf's? Yes, you have to reindex your content if you've changed it. Verity does

Re: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit

2002-01-14 Thread David Brown
> Do I need to create a scheduled task "autoupdateindex.cfm" and use the > tag to update the verity collections I have as we add new doc's > and so on or will verity collection auto update as we add new doc's and > pdf's? > > David __

Re: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit

2002-01-11 Thread David Brown
ED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:36 PM Subject: RE: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit > Eric, > > I agree that 125000 is a lot for a site collection where you are doing a > "search this site" type of function - but if yo

RE: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit

2002-01-11 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit I would tend to agree with Eric. 125000 is an immense amount of documents, more than anyone I know of would need. It is probably a performance thing or something. There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and [Unix] BSD. W

Re: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit

2002-01-11 Thread Douglas Brown
I would tend to agree with Eric. 125000 is an immense amount of documents, more than anyone I know of would need. It is probably a performance thing or something. There are two major products that come out of Berkeley: LSD and [Unix] BSD. We don't believe this to be a coincidence. Doug Br

Re: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit

2002-01-11 Thread Eric Carlisle
> does this mean if I change the DocCountLimit to something more then > 125000 (something like 25) will that allow me to increase the limit? Could also be that they set it that way for a reason :/ __ Dedicated Windows 2000 S

Re: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit

2002-01-11 Thread Howie Hamlin
If it does it also makes you liable for breaking the license. I'd be careful - just because you CAN do something doesn't mean that you can legally do it. Howie - Original Message - From: "David Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002

RE: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit

2002-01-11 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
Well - the problem is testing it. Do you have a collection that is that large? Mark -Original Message- From: David Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:22 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF 5.0 Verity Collections Limit I know based on the manual that CF 5.0 Pro l

RE: Cf 5.0 Upgrade

2001-12-13 Thread Brunt, Michael
My experience is the main thing to watch for is any Java based CF Stuff you are using (CFTREE-CFGRID etc.) Need to make sure that the latest version of the JVM is installed. In addition, take care if you are using Advanced Security as this was upgraded to a later version in CF5.0. Outside of th

RE: CF 5.0 Management Repository Server

2001-09-25 Thread Dave Watts
> Have you heard anything about CFgraph and JVM problems? I've heard that passing some malformed attributes to CFGRAPH may cause problems, but I don't know any details really. Both Generator (the CFGRAPH engine) and the management services use JRun, though, so I wouldn't be surprised if they shar

Re: CF 5.0 Management Repository Server

2001-09-25 Thread Neil H.
Have you heard anything about CFgraph and JVM problems? Thanks, Neil - Original Message - From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:16 PM Subject: RE: CF 5.0 Management Repository Serv

RE: CF 5.0 Management Repository Server

2001-08-27 Thread Dave Watts
> I have noticed that the service "CF Management Repository Server" is > sucking up all my memory on my Win2k system. I have 261M RAM on my > system. Is this not enough? The problem just started this morning. I > loaded CF 5.0 about 5 days ago. There's a patch for this, which Ben Forta announced

RE: CF 5.0 vs CF 4.5 - Enterprise vs Pro

2001-08-08 Thread Thomas Chiverton
> Advanced Security, Clustering, or you want any of the new > features of CF5, I've said it before, I'll say it again. CF4.5 pro does advanced security. ~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionaut

Re: CF 5.0 vs CF 4.5 - Enterprise vs Pro

2001-08-07 Thread tom muck
Stick with Pro unless you need clustering or native DB drivers. Definitely upgrade to 5.0, though. You'll notice much better performance -- like 3 or 4 times faster execution times. tom www.basic-ultradev.com "David Caplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PR

Re: CF 5.0 vs CF 4.5 - Enterprise vs Pro

2001-08-07 Thread Bruce Sorge
If you already have CF4.5, and you do not need any of the new features of CF 5.0, then I would stick with your current version. However, if you need Advanced Security, Clustering, or you want any of the new features of CF5, then upgrade. I have upgraded both 4.5 Pro and Enterprise to both versions

Re: CF 5.0 Enterprise Server install problems

2001-08-06 Thread Neil H.
rom: "Mike Brunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 4:35 PM Subject: RE: CF 5.0 Enterprise Server install problems > Is CF4.5 still running ok after the aborted install of CF5.0. > > Kind Regards

RE: CF 5.0 Enterprise Server install problems

2001-08-06 Thread Mike Brunt
PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:17 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF 5.0 Enterprise Server install problems Reinstalling isn't an option. Any other ideas what I can do to upgrade this to 5.0? Thanks, Neil - Original Message - From: "Neil H." <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: CF 5.0 Enterprise Server install problems

2001-08-06 Thread Neil H.
Reinstalling isn't an option. Any other ideas what I can do to upgrade this to 5.0? Thanks, Neil - Original Message - From: "Neil H." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2001 2:31 PM Subject: CF 5.0 Enterprise Server install problems > When at

RE: CF 5.0 Installation Problems...

2001-08-01 Thread Lawrence B. Afrin, M.D.
Philip -- Just wanted to say a big "thank you!" for your July 27th tip I found in the archive about getting around a hang in the upgrade from 4.5 to 5.0. I was kind of nervous about trying the uninstall 4.5/install 5.0 route, so I tried stopping all nonessential services, and bingo, InstallShield

RE: CF 5.0 Installation Problems...

2001-07-27 Thread Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
Hi Neil, This happened when we tried to upgrade as well. I'm not precisely sure what I did, but finally the installer did open up. I believe I rebooted, stopped all CF services, all IIS services, launched the installer, and then just waited about 5 minutes until it finally came up. The RAM usa

RE: CF 5.0 Installation Problems...

2001-07-27 Thread Philip Arnold - ASP
> I ran into the same issue. What I did was remove my old version (all your > sites are still there as well as DSN's), and then ran the install. IF you > are using an Upgrade version, be sure to have the original CD Key handy > because you will be asked. The new upgrade is a great improvement - y

Re: CF 5.0 Installation Problems...

2001-07-27 Thread Bruce Sorge
I ran into the same issue. What I did was remove my old version (all your sites are still there as well as DSN's), and then ran the install. IF you are using an Upgrade version, be sure to have the original CD Key handy because you will be asked. - Original Message - From: "Neil H." <[EMAI

RE: CF 5.0 / Win2K Problem

2001-07-17 Thread Peter Tilbrook
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I had the same issue but it dissappeared after a reboot. - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Skyward Internet Technology Sent: Tuesday, 17 July 2001 5:41 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CF 5.0 / Win2K P

Re: CF 5.0 and Java 2

2001-07-15 Thread Lee Moore
Very simple... Go to http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/jre/ and follow the links to download the Java Runtime Environment Install the executable file that is downloaded. That's it The java runtime environment installs the java 2 plugin for any browsers installed on the system. - Original M

Re: CF 5.0 Problems?

2001-06-21 Thread Michael Dinowitz
In CF 4.x and earlier there were datasources in the allaire section of the registry. When moving stuff over, I found that they are now stored only (or so it seems) in the odbc.ini location. You may have to move them over in the registry by hand. I'll look at my old and new reg at home for more inf

RE: CF 5.0 Problems?

2001-06-21 Thread Garza, Jeff
Did you by chance have the CFAS Service set to start under a user account other than system? I found that my CF upgrade installed the CF service under the system account again. Had to reset and re-start CF. HTH, Jeff Garza Lead Developer/Webmaster Spectrum Astro, Inc. 480.892.8200 [EMAIL PRO

RE: CF 5.0

2001-05-25 Thread Ann Harrell
Well.. I have the beta and until Black Tuesday I was an Allaire employee. I read beta.allaire.com everyday. Ann > -Original Message- > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 6:12 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subj

Re: CF 5.0

2001-05-25 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Friday, May 25, 2001 5:06 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: CF 5.0 > > > > > > * Team Allaire * > > No real need. CF code issues can be discussed right here on > > CF-Talk. Server > > issues li

RE: CF 5.0

2001-05-25 Thread Ann Harrell
I'm ready! Let's get started! Ann > -Original Message- > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 5:06 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: CF 5.0 > > > * Team Allaire ***

Re: CF 5.0

2001-05-25 Thread Michael Dinowitz
* Team Allaire * No real need. CF code issues can be discussed right here on CF-Talk. Server issues like installing or the admin can go to CF-Server. The Partners, Community and other lists will take up the slack on other 5.0 issues. > Will

RE: CF 5.0 - any slow tags/functions speeded up?

2001-05-23 Thread Dave Watts
> In CF 5.0, are there any tags or functions that have been > re-written to run faster, beyond the general performance boost > provided by 5.0? I'm thinking about CFLOOP or IIF which are > known to drag performance. Unfortunately, some operations are simply more intensive than others. IIF is a

RE: CF 5.0 graphs

2001-05-11 Thread Peter Tilbrook
Ah hah! Must be good to beat 4.5.2! : CF 5.0 graphs As CF Studio 5 will be out a while after CF5 ships, a set of add-on VTM's will be made available for Studio 4.5.2. They've already been written (so you don't need to do so), and will be available when CF5 is available. --- Ben ~

Re: CF 5.0 graphs

2001-05-11 Thread Bryan LaPlante
Just as a heads up, if you have personal custom tags or download any from the tag gallery and you would like a personal tag editor for them, go to http://www.netwebapps.com/mytags/main.cfm and use the free custom tag wizard. After you put in the parameters for the tag it will email you a .vtm file

RE: CF 5.0 graphs

2001-05-11 Thread Ben Forta
Gilchrist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 2:53 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF 5.0 graphs Thank you Mr. Forta! Just started looking at the graph tag and it's pretty cool that you can create drilldown graphs by clicking on data points. We were about to go out and get Cr

RE: CF 5.0 graphs

2001-05-11 Thread Dave Watts
> I'm just starting to play with the new CFGRAPH tag and I was > wondering if anyone's created any tag editor's for it? I guess > one will appear for Studio 5.0 but just wondering anyway. > If no-one has I might just take a stab at it myself... No tag editors yet, but Dave Gallerizzo just did a

  1   2   >