: Saturday, October 25, 2003 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: Eolas patent suit
On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Beer wrote:
My livelihood comes
from developing and delivering flash-based newsletters and promotions
in
e-mail.When this change goes into effect, we're either out of
business
... back to directly CF related, what is the workaround already put
forward, I don't seem to be able to find it.
We use dynamically generated PDF's a lot
Bryan Stevenson wrote:
Why would you not be able to use the workaround already put forward?I haven't paid a huge amount of attention as
PLEASE move this off topic discussion off of CF-Talk and onto CF-OT or
CF-Community.
Thank you
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
On Friday, October 24, 2003, at 12:03 PM, Jeff Beer wrote:
My livelihood comes
from developing and delivering flash-based newsletters and promotions
in
e-mail. When this change goes into effect, we're either out of
business
or facing the loss of our primary product.
You don't have
You don't have anything to worry about, Jeff.Users who have enabled
ActiveX controls in Outlook will not be prompted before the Flash
player and other ActiveX controls are loaded.
Does anyone in their right mind enable ActiveX controls in Outlook?
Nick
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
On Saturday, October 25, 2003, at 04:22 PM, Nick de Voil wrote:
Does anyone in their right mind enable ActiveX controls in Outlook?
That's a good question.ActiveX controls are disabled in Outlook by
default.Of course, that is not a result of the upcoming changes to
Internet Explorer.The point
Message-
From: Nick de Voil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 25, 2003 4:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Eolas patent suit
You don't have anything to worry about, Jeff.Users who have enabled
ActiveX controls in Outlook will not be prompted before the Flash
player and other
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 2:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT is OT (was Re: Eolas patent suit)
Thank you. There is a CF-OT list just for this discussion. CF-Talk is for CF
technical talk only. I'd have jumped
Sure!
Lots of folks do: Crazy people, masochists, people who believe that
There's enough distrust in the world, Pirates (they like the X),
Rerun from TV's What's Happing!. um, Goofy (despite Micky and Donald's
warnings), and, um. well - I think that's about it.
Well, I'm not sure Rerun is
Jeff Beer wrote:
I'm more than a little worried about this change.My livelihood comes
from developing and delivering flash-based newsletters and promotions in
e-mail.When this change goes into effect, we're either out of business
or facing the loss of our primary product.
I've seen no
Why would you not be able to use the workaround already put forward?I haven't paid a huge amount of attention as it doesn't effect any of my past of near future work.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Beer
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 9:03 AM
Subject: Eolas patent
I've seen no workarounds that will allow us to embed flash
in an HTML e-mail message - scripting is out. This is a
huge bummer.
Why would you not be able to use the workaround already put
forward?I haven't paid a huge amount of attention as it
doesn't effect any of my past of near
Dave is correct - scripting is out for e-mail messages - way too many
variables to test for and manage, assuming you can even test. We've
developed a way to allow the code to 'gracefully degrade' from fully
scripted embedding of the OBJECT tag, to showing a standard jpg image,
that works on almost
Shouldn't this Eolas stuff be OT?
I know Flash and CF are nicely integrated, but this is CF-Talk. It's hard
enough to filter through the amount of mail on this list - OT posts should
be marked as such to help us find the CF stuff, at least. I don't use
Flash, or anything affected by the Eolas
I know Flash and CF are nicely integrated, but this is CF-Talk. It's
hard
enough to filter through the amount of mail on this list - OT posts
should
be marked as such to help us find the CF stuff, at least. I don't use
Flash, or anything affected by the Eolas patent suit (even though I
Subject: RE: Eolas patent suit
Dave is correct - scripting is out for e-mail messages - way too
many
variables to test for and manage, assuming you can even test.
We've
developed a way to allow the code to 'gracefully degrade' from
fully
scripted embedding of the OBJECT tag, to showing
Thank you. There is a CF-OT list just for this discussion. CF-Talk is for CF
technical talk only. I'd have jumped on this earlier if I wasn't dealing with
just having my wisdom teeth out and a dead box (another site).
Please move the Eolas, MM sock and related threads either to the MM-Talk list or
.
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Beer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Eolas patent suit
Dave is correct - scripting is out for e-mail messages - way too
many
variables to test for and manage, assuming you can even test.
We've
18 matches
Mail list logo
