RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question

2003-01-13 Thread Tilbrook, Peter
> Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 1:41 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question > > Adam, > > There's one called "CF Objects" I believe. Plus, everyone has their > own preferred "home grown" method - everyon

RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question

2003-01-13 Thread John Quarto-vonTivadar
ders. There is also "Fusebox: methodology and techniques" but that is now 3 years old and quite out of date -Original Message- From: Mosh Teitelbaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:40 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Que

RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question

2003-01-13 Thread Owens, Howard
t; > -Mark > > > > -Original Message- > From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:17 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question > > > " Fusebox is the most widely dis

RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question

2003-01-13 Thread Mosh Teitelbaum
-9191 Fax: (301) 933-3651 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.evoch.com/ > -Original Message- > From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 4:17 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question >

RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question

2003-01-13 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:17 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question " Fusebox is the most widely distributed Framework/Methodology for developing ColdFusion Applications" What other Framework/Methodologies exist for Cold Fusion? Is the

RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question

2003-01-13 Thread Luce, Greg
was RE: Design Pattern Question " Fusebox is the most widely distributed Framework/Methodology for developing ColdFusion Applications" What other Framework/Methodologies exist for Cold Fusion? Is the fuseBox framework/methodology decided by a consortium? Or by a few elite people?

RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question

2003-01-13 Thread Mike Brunt
- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question > I also know that there is a lot of interest among Flash > developers about Fusebox as a methodology/framework for > Flash Application de

RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question

2003-01-13 Thread Adrocknaphobia Jones
" Fusebox is the most widely distributed Framework/Methodology for developing ColdFusion Applications" What other Framework/Methodologies exist for Cold Fusion? Is the fuseBox framework/methodology decided by a consortium? Or by a few elite people? Adam Wayne Lehman Web Systems Developer Johns H

RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question

2003-01-13 Thread Haggerty, Mike
- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 3:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question > I also know that there is a lot of interest among Flash > developers about Fusebox as a methodology/framework for > Flash Ap

RE: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question

2003-01-13 Thread Dave Watts
> I also know that there is a lot of interest among Flash > developers about Fusebox as a methodology/framework for > Flash Application development. Really? I'd have to take issue with that. Most Flash developers I've met are much more interested in typical OOP development framework ideas, such

Re: Fusebox was RE: Design Pattern Question

2003-01-13 Thread Samuel R. Neff
At 12:08 PM 1/13/2003, you wrote: >I also know that there is a lot of interest among Flash developers about >Fusebox as a methodology/framework for Flash Application development. Really? I've never seen anything indicating this--I'd be interested in reading the archives. Where was it discussed