Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-02 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Tuesday 01 Jun 2010 20:44:12 you wrote: I've seen a couple of Javascript libraries that create support for the semantic tags (header, footer etc), but support for canvas, video and audio And even then, what codec are you going to use for VIDEO ? All 3 ? won't be mainstream unitl IE9

RE: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-02 Thread andy matthews
FYI I upgraded from XP to Windows 7 and have had zero issues. andy -Original Message- From: Les Mizzell [mailto:lesm...@bellsouth.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 11:25 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it It won't even

RE: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-02 Thread Sebastiaan GMC van Dijk
all the fish == Onlinebase.nl Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 10:13:29 +0100 Subject: Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it From: tom.chiver...@halliwells.com To: cf-talk@houseoffusion.com On Tuesday 01 Jun 2010 20:44:12 you wrote: I've seen a couple of Javascript

RE: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-02 Thread Eric Roberts
-Original Message- From: Les Mizzell [mailto:lesm...@bellsouth.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 11:25 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it It won't even be mainstream then. There's still an awful lot of people out there running XP XP isn't

Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-02 Thread Sean Corfield
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Eric Roberts ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote: When you go to a new OS, it is always best to do a clean install rather than an upgrade. On Windows, probably. On a Mac, upgrades are pretty much always very straightforward and quick (and Mac OS upgrades are

RE: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-01 Thread Andy Matthews
While I agree with you that it's not ready, one of the benefits to using it is that if a browser doesn't understand something, then it'll just skip it. And if you're deadset on running your code as fully HTML 5, you could always output it as XML then render it with your own XSLT doc while you

RE: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-01 Thread Andy Matthews
On a side note, here's a dissenting viewpoint: http://ishtml5ready.com/ -Original Message- From: Scott Stewart [mailto:webmas...@sstwebworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:11 PM To: cf-talk Subject: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it I'm starting to dig

Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-01 Thread Wil Genovese
So is this the official opinion? ALl I get when I hit that page is the following error. Content Encoding Error The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because it uses an invalid or unsupported form of compression. * Please contact the website owners to inform them of this

Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-01 Thread Scott Stewart
I've seen a couple of Javascript libraries that create support for the semantic tags (header, footer etc), but support for canvas, video and audio won't be mainstream unitl IE9 comes out (I'm not a M$ fanboy, but it is the most widely used browser). On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Andy Matthews

Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-01 Thread Kris Sisk
I've seen a couple of Javascript libraries that create support for the semantic tags (header, footer etc), but support for canvas, video and audio won't be mainstream unitl IE9 comes out (I'm not a M$ fanboy, but it is the most widely used browser). It won't even be mainstream then. There's

RE: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-01 Thread Mark A. Kruger
www.necfug.com -Original Message- From: Kris Sisk [mailto:ks...@gckschools.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 4:23 PM To: cf-talk Subject: Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it I've seen a couple of Javascript libraries that create support for the semantic tags

RE: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-01 Thread Eric Roberts
That's one of the big selling points with smart phones like the Droid and iPhone... -Original Message- From: Mark A. Kruger [mailto:mkru...@cfwebtools.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 4:36 PM To: cf-talk Subject: RE: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it Kris

Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-01 Thread Sean Corfield
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Scott Stewart webmas...@sstwebworks.com wrote: I'm starting to dig into HTML 5, and so far, apart from some of the CSS3 attributes, I don't see anything that jumps out and says ready for prime time. The browser support is spotty at best, let's be real does it

Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-01 Thread Dan G. Switzer, II
The great thing (or not so great, depending on your view) is that older browsers will simply ignore the markup they don't understand. That allows you to gracefully fallback for older legacy browsers. -Dan On Tuesday, June 1, 2010, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jun 1,

Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-01 Thread Les Mizzell
It won't even be mainstream then. There's still an awful lot of people out there running XP XP isn't broke. I've seen no reason to fix it myself so far. Guess I'm one of those awful lot of people. If MS had given me an upgrade path from XP instead of a delete everything start from scratch

Re: HTML 5, has anyone done anything more than played with it

2010-06-01 Thread Mark Mandel
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Les Mizzell lesm...@bellsouth.net wrote: It won't even be mainstream then. There's still an awful lot of people out there running XP XP isn't broke. I've seen no reason to fix it myself so far. Guess I'm one of those awful lot of people. If MS had given me