Never mindfound it!!!
Doug
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 8:11 AM
Subject: Homesite question?
> I installed the tag update for homesite+ and was wondering how you would
ad those tags to the list of tag
thank you nathan...i did that...ok, but not great...
man 802.11b networks can be slow :(
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Strutz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: homesite+ question
In CF Studio 5 (which is much like hs+), the
In CF Studio 5 (which is much like hs+), the file list is slow unless you
take off the "Document Title" column. The icons won't take hardly any
resources, but the title forces the program to search each file for a
tag. Turn it off by right-clicking in the file area window, go to
view and uncheck "
Macromedia were planning on upgrading CF Studio above version 5 but ran into
strife with Adobe (who won the lawsuit).
Still we have Dreamweaver MX and HomeSite+.
>>
Homesite 5 was released 3 years ago...
- Calvin
<<
**
The
That wasn't my opinion, just paraphrasing :)
- Original Message -
From: "Raymond Camden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 9:11 AM
Subject: RE: Homesite + question
> > True it's an opini
> True it's an opinion, however while semantics aside, I
> realize that CF developers have done well without and IDE,
> but then again, many of them graduate to real languages with
> real IDE's, to paraphrase...
CF is not a real language? Wow, have I been building apps in an
imaginary world?
=
> I hope you are right, but my thought is that we are already seeing MM stop
> developing and supporting Homesite.
The free 5.2 update was released 5 months ago, not that bad in my opinion...
> Did you happen to locate the Homesite Development Center on
macromedia.com?
> But we got one for Centr
ssimo Foti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: Homesite + question
> > I view the lack of an effective IDE as a shortcoming of CF, albeit that
> you
> > can develop with no IDE at all is c
> I view the lack of an effective IDE as a shortcoming of CF, albeit that
you
> can develop with no IDE at all is certainly a good thing, but then you can
> use notepad for Java too, can't you? :P
Well, Java managed to became relevant long before decent Java IDEs were
available...
> And the sad
s" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 8:40 PM
Subject: RE: Homesite + question
> > In another discussion, in a galaxy far far away, I made
> > the observation that the success of CF long term definitely
> > r
> In another discussion, in a galaxy far far away, I made
> the observation that the success of CF long term definitely
> rests upon having a good CF IDE.
I would argue that this is an opinion, rather than an observation. CF
developers have done well so far with next to no IDE - I agree with Kwa
TED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: Homesite + question
> > Here's an interesting fact. I was comparing CF and PHP a while ago, and
> > came across some threads. Most attributed the success of a cf developer
&
> Here's an interesting fact. I was comparing CF and PHP a while ago, and
> came across some threads. Most attributed the success of a cf developer
to
> the excellent IDE that cf developers had. Now that was an uneducated
With all due respect to everybody that uses CF Studio, including myself,
ace.
MM claims they listen to developers. Lol yeah right.
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Homesite + question
- Original Message -
From: "Barney Boisvert" <[EMAIL PROTECT
- Original Message -
From: "Barney Boisvert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 2:28 PM
Subject: RE: Homesite + question
Yes, I know HS+ exists, but is it going to
> be around for the next iteration of
the next iteration of tools, or just DW?
barneyb
---
Barney Boisvert, Senior Development Engineer
AudienceCentral
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
voice : 360.756.8080 x12
fax : 360.647.5351
www.audiencecentral.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Th
t;
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: Homesite + question
> On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 09:53 US/Pacific, Calvin Ward wrote:
> > I guess I was mostly curious about some of the gaps between CF Studio
> > and
> > MX, such as Snippet Shortcuts, divided file/folde
On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 09:53 US/Pacific, Calvin Ward wrote:
> I guess I was mostly curious about some of the gaps between CF Studio
> and
> MX, such as Snippet Shortcuts, divided file/folder browsing, filepath
> in the
> title bar and so forth.
I've used a few editors which have the divid
inal Message -
From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: Homesite + question
> On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 05:59 US/Pacific, Peter Tilbrook wrote:
> > You cannot &qu
On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 10:20 US/Pacific, Patricia G. L. Hall
wrote:
> Yet... I like the coder IDE so much better than the designer version,
> and I can't get that on a Mac... it's only available on the win version
> of dwmx or on Homesite+.
I'm not sure what you're referring to here. I use
I've used both cfstudio and dw for a long time... I even dared to use
ultradev. Especially since when I'm at home I dev on a Mac I was
oh-so-happy to have the new dwmx and be able to finally do real mac-cf
dev.
Yet... I like the coder IDE so much better than the designer version,
and I ca
source control with CFMX...
- Calvin
- Original Message -
From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: Homesite + question
> On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 08:05 US/Pac
Sure.
/charlie
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:32 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Homesite + question
>
>
> Missed that one, sorry. Very complete answer and with your
> permission I
On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 08:05 US/Pacific, Calvin Ward wrote:
> Does your team use DWMX? I noticed you mentioned it a few times in your
> coding guidelines.
Yes, for the most part my team uses DWMX. I think there's a couple of
diehard CF Studio fans (although one just switched to a Mac so I
lk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 10:50 AM
Subject: Re: Homesite + question
> On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 05:59 US/Pacific, Peter Tilbrook wrote:
> > You cannot "buy" HomeSite+ off the shelf at this stage. I guess MM
> > want you
> >
On Thursday, Jun 26, 2003, at 05:59 US/Pacific, Peter Tilbrook wrote:
> You cannot "buy" HomeSite+ off the shelf at this stage. I guess MM
> want you
> to buy Dreamweaver MX (then it comes FREE, sort of, on the CD).
CF Studio used to cost $499 US. DWMX costs $399 US. So it is now
cheaper to buy
CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:59 AM
Subject: RE: Homesite + question
> 3) There has been no marketing for the product for 2 years.
>
> Studio MX is very highly publicised. I've got a US $100.00 note stuck in
my
> undies I can'
>>
To be brutal here are the facts from a Studio 3 veteran. Apologies to
Allaire/Bradsoft/Macromedia.
Here goes...
>>
As a product called "ColdFusion Studio xxx" MM will not be releasing a
successor to the last incarnation of the product (CFStudio 5).
In the interim MM have developed the comel
nesday, June 25, 2003 10:41 PM
Subject: Re: Homesite + question
> > Aside from documentation, any differences are marginal.
> >
> > Most of the changes are in the configurability area due to the legal
issues
> > that were in play between Adobe and Macromedia at the time.
>
inal Message-
> > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 10:42 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Homesite + question
> >
> >
> > > Aside from documentation, any differences are marginal.
> > >
Michael, did you catch my reply to your question at 3:32 today? Or are you
saying you want still more detail?
/charlie
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 10:42 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Home
I like what the docs say but I'd like to hear what a human says, especially one
that has used both and can be critical about what was changed, missing, etc.
> HomeSite 5.2 Release Notes
---cut---
~|
Archives: http://www.hou
itor toolbar to edit the current
document.
Macromedia Fireworks
If Fireworks is detected on your system, you can now launch it directly by
right-clicking on an tag, a graphics file in the Files list, or the
Thumbnail view of a file, and then selecting the Edit in Macromedia Firewo
> Aside from documentation, any differences are marginal.
>
> Most of the changes are in the configurability area due to the legal issues
> that were in play between Adobe and Macromedia at the time.
Those are the differences I'd like to hear about. Were they corrected in the
updater? Have people u
quot;CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 12:54 PM
Subject: Re: Homesite + question
> Can you detail the things that are still different between Studio and the
latest
> HS+.
>
>
~|
Arc
deed purchase HomeSite 5.2. That's correct. You can. But you cannot
purchase HomeSite+. HomeSite+ has the same differences from the base
HomeSite product that CF Studio did. HomeSite and HomeSite+ are different
products.
/charlie
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mail
Can you detail the things that are still different between Studio and the latest
HS+.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=sub
gt; From: John Wilker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 11:00 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Homesite + question
>
>
> Figured out where I went astray. I had used the 52 installer. Which is the
> trial. D'oh! Uninstalled that and used the updater on my H
I didn't use HS+ previously. I just tested it
with CFFUNCTION and CFXML. :)
all is good. THanks folks
-Original Message-
From: GL [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 7:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Homesite + question
Does the Homesite+ install include the CFMX tag compl
Does the Homesite+ install include the CFMX tag completion/help stuff,
or can the vtm files be installed manually?
-Original Message-
From: Clint [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Homesite + question
If you have Dreamweaver MX
D]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 9:29 AM
Subject: RE: Homesite + question
> mmm I'll re install and see, I don't recall it asking. Just to make sure I
> am on the right page. Like most MACR stuff there is just the one installer
> out there for HS+ right?
>
> -Ori
> mmm I'll re install and see, I don't recall it asking. Just to make sure I
> am on the right page. Like most MACR stuff there is just the one installer
> out there for HS+ right?
There is also an updater available from MM website:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/homesite/download/
-
o: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Homesite + question
> I downloaded the most recent Homesite plus installer and
> it's trial. I have a legit license for Studio MX, how do
> I get HS+ to see that?
If I recall correctly, you should be a
Right, but there is a newer installer that has newer features and such. More
studio like.
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 4:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Homesite + question
Homesite is on the studio CD (win-only
Homesite is on the studio CD (win-only, obviously), but you have to browse
the CD to get to it; it's not in the nice flash installer thingy. You have
to install it from there, the trial applications that you can download can't
be converted to licensed applications that I've found. Kind of annoyin
> I downloaded the most recent Homesite plus installer and
> it's trial. I have a legit license for Studio MX, how do
> I get HS+ to see that?
If I recall correctly, you should be able to use your Dreamweaver MX serial
number during the install.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.fig
erful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 9:43 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Homesite+ Question
>
>
> >Download and install the 5.2 updater and you will be able to disabl
Yahoo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 9:40 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Homesite+ Question
>
>
> I do believe
>Download and install the 5.2 updater and you will be able to disable
the tabs.
Well now that's good news. Does that include the full capability of CF
Studio i.e. can you add buttons and create custom toolbars?
Ken
~|
Archives:
I do believe that was the major impact of the Adobe litigation. That's
also why I uninstalled Hoemsite+ in favor of CF Studio v5. While some
dismiss the issue as minor, it's major annoyance for me. Not sure what
the terms of the settlement were but it sure would be nice if the two
had decided to pu
Download and install the 5.2 updater and you will be able to disable the
tabs.
Clint
- Original Message -
From: "Venable, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 9:21 AM
Subject: Homesite+ Question
> Hello,
>
> Just got a new XP machine
51 matches
Mail list logo
