On Thursday 18 Mar 2004 15:50 pm, Rob wrote:
Try it again - I just tried it on FireFox linux worked ok
Err... well, I can type things in the box, but there is nothing to tell me
what to type to see it working :-)
Could you put a few sentances on the site to explain what to do to see it
On Fri, 2004-03-19 at 01:54, Thomas Chiverton wrote:
On Thursday 18 Mar 2004 15:50 pm, Rob wrote:
Try it again - I just tried it on FireFox linux worked ok
Err... well, I can type things in the box, but there is nothing to tell me
what to type to see it working :-)
Could you put a few
Dick Applebaum wrote:
The full impact of this hasn't ripenedin my mind yet -- at the very
Yeah, same here. It's sounding very cool, I just can't yet work out
where I'd use it...
Having said that I could've created a whole web service back/frontend to
my most recent project and built a whole
Dick Applebaum wrote:
The full impact of this hasn't ripenedin my mind yet -- at the very
Yeah, same here. It's sounding very cool, I just can't yet work out
where I'd use it...
Having said that I could've created a whole web service back/frontend to
my most recent project and built a whole
On Wednesday 17 Mar 2004 23:39 pm, Rob wrote:
It works on my linux Mozilla 1.4.1 and IE 6.0. I *think* it'll work on
IE 5... I should try XP too.
Doesn't work on my FireFox .8 :-(
robject.getAddOne is not a function
This is very cool though, but for the moment I'll have to stick to pengoworks
On Mar 18, 2004, at 3:32 AM, Thomas Chiverton wrote:
Doesn't work on my FireFox .8 :-(
mmm... Works on FireFox 0.8 on OS X
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
On Thu, 2004-03-18 at 03:32, Thomas Chiverton wrote:
On Wednesday 17 Mar 2004 23:39 pm, Rob wrote:
It works on my linux Mozilla 1.4.1 and IE 6.0. I *think* it'll work on
IE 5... I should try XP too.
Doesn't work on my FireFox .8 :-(
robject.getAddOne is not a function
I was working on
Rob,
That's great, but man do you have a lot of time on your hands... It's a
cool toy for sure though, although I can't think of a use for it. How
browser compatabile is the _javascript_? like will it run on IE5~ish browsers?
The things we do when we are unemployed
tell me about it. i did
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 15:27, Nathan Strutz wrote:
That's great, but man do you have a lot of time on your hands...
I guess - took about 2 days to do the whole thing (would've taken longer
if Dave didnt hook me up with the soap SOAPAction value )
It's a
cool toy for sure though, although I
I don't know how useless this would be - I can see potential for it right away.
For instance - what if I had a page that had to dynamically change or update parts of the page (i.e. search results)?I currently do this sort of thing by calling a new page in a hidden IFrame, which will then
What about Dan Switzer's Client/Server Gateway JSAPI? Have you toyed with
this at all?
http://www.pengoworks.com/workshop/js/gateway/
Mike
For instance - what if I had a page that had to dynamically
change or update parts of the page (i.e. search results)?I
currently do this sort of thing
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 16:15, Michael T. Tangorre wrote:
What about Dan Switzer's Client/Server Gateway JSAPI? Have you toyed with
this at all?
http://www.pengoworks.com/workshop/js/gateway/
Oh wow man. you just killed me :( Well, it looks like he did it as well. Oh well so much for
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 16:15, Michael T. Tangorre wrote:
What about Dan Switzer's Client/Server Gateway JSAPI? Have you toyed with
this at all?
http://www.pengoworks.com/workshop/js/gateway/
Ah no his is totallly different ... thank goodness :-D
he is using an iframe and wddx (it looks like)
On Mar 17, 2004, at 4:26 PM, Rob wrote:
On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 16:15, Michael T. Tangorre wrote:
What about Dan Switzer's Client/Server Gateway JSAPI? Have you
toyed with
this at all?
http://www.pengoworks.com/workshop/js/gateway/
Ah no his is totallly different ... thank goodness :-D
he
14 matches
Mail list logo
