RE: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3?

2003-08-20 Thread info
t; Sent: Aug 20, 2003 11:01 AM Subject: RE: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3? >> -Original Message- >> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:15 PM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: Re: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3?

RE: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3?

2003-08-20 Thread Haggerty, Mike
> -Original Message- > From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:15 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3? > > It would perhaps be instructive to find a reasonably sized > FB3 app and > t

Re: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3?

2003-08-19 Thread Sean A Corfield
On Tuesday, Aug 19, 2003, at 12:06 US/Pacific, Haggerty, Mike wrote: > With all due respect, I think the distinctive differences between FB > and > Mach II do not prevent one from making a judgment as to which framework > is 'faster' for a given project. Well, the code would have to be completely

RE: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3?

2003-08-19 Thread Haggerty, Mike
of overall speed enhancement within the framework. M -Original Message- From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:53 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3? Nicholas, there are major differences between Mach II and Fusebox 3.0 wh

RE: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3?

2003-08-19 Thread Mike Brunt
Nicholas, there are major differences between Mach II and Fusebox 3.0 which really make them incomparable. Here are some major differences. FB 30 is a framework for procedural programming style (as against an OO based style). Mach II is firmly rooted in an OO based style. Mach II uses ColdFu