On 11/11/05, Mark Fuqua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Could one of the guys who has done work with RoR work through the tutorials
> for PLUM? It seems to me the two have similar features. It would have to be
> someone who doesn't mind working on a windows machine (rules out Sean,
Oh yeah, don't get me wrong. I looked at it for a couple of weeks and
was REALLY impressed. Adam and David have done incredibly strong work.
They probably picked the correct databases to support in the beginning
too, given the limited resources... If I could change what I use at work
to fit aro
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 9:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Ruby on Rails hey, read this one.
That's the one problem I can't get around with PLUM. As soon as they can
support MySQL, I will certainly revisit the
That's the one problem I can't get around with PLUM. As soon as they can
support MySQL, I will certainly revisit the possibility of using PLUM.
You know, come to think of it, I wonder if the new Oracle Express free
version would work with PLUM; maybe I'll go check that out. Express is
10g and P
ugh.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 1:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Ruby on Rails hey, read this one.
Yep, you're correct about only the IDE requiring windows. But PLUM
itself only supports MSSQL, Acces
Yep, you're correct about only the IDE requiring windows. But PLUM
itself only supports MSSQL, Access and Oracle 9i. Granted, Oracle
isn't Windows-only, but it's also massively non-free. You might be
able to develop on one of those, and then deploy to something else,
but it'd undoubtedly be a bu
> Sadly "doesn't mind working on a windows machine" rules out
> a lot more than just Sean. Not to belittle the work they've
> done in any way (from what I understand, it's pretty impressive),
> but using Java, Ruby, Python, etc. rather than .NET would
> have made for a much larger target audien
Sadly "doesn't mind working on a windows machine" rules out a lot more
than just Sean. Not to belittle the work they've done in any way
(from what I understand, it's pretty impressive), but using Java,
Ruby, Python, etc. rather than .NET would have made for a much larger
target audience. Java see
Good morning,
Could one of the guys who has done work with RoR work through the tutorials
for PLUM? It seems to me the two have similar features. It would have to be
someone who doesn't mind working on a windows machine (rules out Sean, who
might be the best suited).
I really can't believe Ruby
Good morning,
Could one of the guys who has done work with RoR work through the tutorials
for PLUM? It seems to me the two have similar features. It would have to be
someone who doesn't mind working on a windows machine (rules out Sean, who
might be the best suited).
I really can't believe Ruby
10 matches
Mail list logo
