Re: (Admin) RE: Off topic posts was  (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-06 Thread Paris Lundis
present] [connecting people, places and things] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Dinowitz) Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 10:55:51 -0400 Subject: (Admin) RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun > Discussion about if a post is OT or not should be moved to the > CF-Com

RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-05 Thread Tyson Vanek
sions. -Tyson -Original Message- From: Zac Belado [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:39 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun > I for one welcome SOT posts. I've never been one to wear CF blinders. Certainly valid in a gene

(Admin) RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-05 Thread Michael Dinowitz
elopment, EDS >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >-Original Message- >From: Scott Van Vliet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:39 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun > > >My thoughts exactly! Sometimes, th

RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-05 Thread Tyson Vanek
It's a question about another Allaire (I STILL can't mutter the word Macromedia) product, so how far off topic is it, really? He marked his post as off-topic. I would recommend that if you can't stand off-topic posts (even though it's not that far off topic), perhaps you should build a filter or

RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-05 Thread Billy Cravens
: Scott Van Vliet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:39 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun My thoughts exactly! Sometimes, these OT posts help me out more that posts made to this list about CF (fundamentals, etc.)! - SVV -Original

RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-05 Thread DeVoil, Nick
> It was just too complicated to set up, whereas TomCat is supposed to be a lot easier! You've got to be joking. My experience is exactly the opposite. Certainly for reasonably simple JSP's - that's as far as I've got - JRun works practically straight out of the box. It has a web-based administr

Re: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-04 Thread Wjreichard
I hear you ... the Cobol bus is still running also. In a message dated 9/4/01 7:31:55 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Well I am happy staying on the CF bus. As a development language to be > compiled? into servlets. > >

RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-04 Thread Parker, Kevin
PROTECTED] www.workcover.com p: +61 8 82332548 f: +61 8 82332000 m: 0418 806 166 -Original Message- From: Nick Texidor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 5 September 2001 8:38:AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun And lets face it.. At least this

RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-04 Thread Eric Dawson
.. example: a real estate relocation site, can tap into information created by my memberbase - half baked ideas - but brainstorming anyway ... Eric Dawson From: "Zac Belado" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Off to

Re: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-04 Thread Eric Dawson
Well I am happy staying on the CF bus. As a development language to be compiled? into servlets. Eric Dawson From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 18:17:30 EDT I f

Re: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-04 Thread Nick Texidor
And lets face it.. At least this off topic post was still slightly CF related, well, MM related!! I'd actually like to know the answer to the question too.., I looked at Jrun for a while and felt that Allaire had turned it into a bloated product. It was just too complicated to set up, whereas To

RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-04 Thread Zac Belado
> Afterall, where else can > one find a > collective gathering of experts in related fields such as this list > provides??? And there are any number of effective resources where these questions can be answered as well. In fact there are also some lists that do specifically discuss a broader ran

RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-04 Thread Scott Van Vliet
My thoughts exactly! Sometimes, these OT posts help me out more that posts made to this list about CF (fundamentals, etc.)! - SVV -Original Message- From: Shawn Grover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:23 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Off topic posts was (OT

RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-04 Thread Zac Belado
> I for one welcome SOT posts. I've never been one to wear CF blinders. Certainly valid in a general sense but I'm not sure if that is an valid comment for a list whose purpose is the discussion of CF related matters. I'm pretty darned interested in Tomcat myself (to drag this back to the contex

RE: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-04 Thread Shawn Grover
If it's clearly marked as OT, why not? Afterall, where else can one find a collective gathering of experts in related fields such as this list provides??? (not claiming to be one of those experts, but they are out there). I find the topics which are marked OT, are related to some aspect of web d

Re: Off topic posts was (OT?) TomCat vs JRun

2001-09-04 Thread Wjreichard
I for one welcome SOT posts. I've never been one to wear CF blinders. I'm sure everyone will not agree with this ... but CF marketshare will diminish. It will be encroached on by JSP and J2EE etc. So an OT? on Tomcat vice JRun is just that OT? IMHO Cheers, Bill In a message dated 9/4/