Re: Rich text Editors

2006-09-01 Thread Tom King
Thanks all for the pointers: I've now successfully integrated TinyMCE into my Custom made CF CMS :) Its really is VERY good... Ta T On 1 Sep 2006, at 05:35, Paul Hastings wrote: James Holmes wrote: Is that something FCK does much better? TinyMCE is pretty good too. I prefer it to FCK.

Re: Rich text Editors

2006-09-01 Thread Jose Diaz
Cool, I also recently integrated TinyMCE into my blogcfc and Im really happy with it. Jose Diaz www.bleachedbug.com On 9/1/06, Tom King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks all for the pointers: I've now successfully integrated TinyMCE into my Custom made CF CMS :) Its really is VERY good...

Re: Rich text Editors

2006-08-31 Thread Jim Wright
- Doesn't use inline styles, i.e p,em,i,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 only - Could load an external CSS stylesheet so what you see in the RTE window takes on the necessary styles of the website in which you're trying to edit - Filters out cut and pasted formatting (but more specifically, word) -

RE: Rich text Editors

2006-08-31 Thread Ben Nadel
I am HUGE fan of XStandard. www.xstandard.com And my thoughts / experiences on it... http://www.bennadel.com/blog/tags/15-XStandard-WYSIWYG-blog-entries.htm ... Ben Nadel www.bennadel.com Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer Need Help? www.bennadel.com/ask-ben/

Re: Rich text Editors

2006-08-31 Thread John Venable
On 8/31/06, Jim Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Doesn't use inline styles, i.e p,em,i,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 only - Could load an external CSS stylesheet so what you see in the RTE window takes on the necessary styles of the website in which you're trying to edit - Filters out cut and

Re: Rich text Editors

2006-08-31 Thread Scott Stroz
TinyMCE is pretty good too. I prefer it to FCK. On 8/31/06, Tom King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Has anyone come across a Rich Text Editor which meets the following requirements: - Doesn't use inline styles, i.e p,em,i,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 only - Could load an external CSS stylesheet

Re: Rich text Editors

2006-08-31 Thread James Holmes
I agree and it should meet all of these requirements too. I recently added it to my BlogCFC install so I know it works well on shared hosting. On 9/1/06, Scott Stroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TinyMCE is pretty good too. I prefer it to FCK. On 8/31/06, Tom King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi

Re: Rich text Editors

2006-08-31 Thread Paul Hastings
Scott Stroz wrote: TinyMCE is pretty good too. I prefer it to FCK. TinyMCE's i18n bits are for the birds. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by

Re: Rich text Editors

2006-08-31 Thread James Holmes
Is that something FCK does much better? On 9/1/06, Paul Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scott Stroz wrote: TinyMCE is pretty good too. I prefer it to FCK. TinyMCE's i18n bits are for the birds. ~| Introducing the

Re: Rich text Editors

2006-08-31 Thread Paul Hastings
James Holmes wrote: Is that something FCK does much better? TinyMCE is pretty good too. I prefer it to FCK. TinyMCE's i18n bits are for the birds. in my opinion, yes. ~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80