RE: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread Shawn Regan
I would say no. But you need to ask yourself. Are these Spam bots smart enough to reverse the extended chars? If they are setup with this type of function, then yes I would say they are still picking them up. I would say this is just a guess they are not doing this type of function while

RE: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread Randell B Adkins
Instead of displaying the email address, why not create a contact form therefore they would not see the actual email address. However, I do as well mask my email addresses using JS and such. But at times I use the forms to eliminate that possibility. My 2 cents... [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/01/03

Re: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread Michael Dinowitz
I wrote an article about it in FA a few issues back explaining the logic and showing off the code. I have to say that since I implemented it, the amount of spam I get to certain addresses (addresses only on the HoF site) is way down. As for robots.txt, that only comes into effect when a robot

RE: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread cfhelp
OK here is a thought... Instead of masking put the email address in the database. Then build a small page that pulls the email and launches the email program. To keep a bot from following the link, confirm that the browser contains Mozilla, MSIE or Opera (any others), or place a dynamically

Re: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Wednesday 01 Oct 2003 15:37 pm, Mark Leder wrote: I've been using a UDF called emailAntiSpam, which replaces an email address in the source code with extended characters which supposedly can't be crawled and picked up by spambots. a href=""> ;

Re: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Mark Leder wrote: I've been using a UDF called emailAntiSpam, which replaces an email address in the source code with extended characters which supposedly can't be crawled and picked up by spambots. So my address:[EMAIL PROTECTED] would look like: a href="">

RE: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread Jim Davis
Basically any method for obfuscation will eventually become useless. perhaps this one has. The only reason it worked at all, or as long as it did, was because spam-bots are so stupid. but they are only as stupid as they can be. Since you're still using a mailto: tag even the dumbest bot would

RE: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread Mark Leder
: RE: Settle an argument for me OK here is a thought... Instead of masking put the email address in the database. Then build a small page that pulls the email and launches the email program. To keep a bot from following the link, confirm that the browser contains Mozilla, MSIE or Opera (any

RE: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread cfhelp
: RE: Settle an argument for me OK here is a thought... Instead of masking put the email address in the database. Then build a small page that pulls the email and launches the email program. To keep a bot from following the link, confirm that the browser contains Mozilla, MSIE or Opera (any

RE: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread Mark Leder
Thanks, I'll give it a whirl. Thanks, Mark -Original Message- From: cfhelp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:22 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Settle an argument for me Loop over the HTTP_USER_AGENT. cfset BrowserList = Mozilla,Opera This could

Re: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread Cutter (CF-Talk)
Mark, I can't see how they could reverse engineer it (though spammers are known to get notoriously industrious.) A technique I've used in the past is to set up a dynamic listing of contacts, which brings up a custom (branded no less) form for the message, then sends the contactID and message

RE: Settle an argument for me

2003-10-01 Thread Mark Leder
Cutter, Another great idea. Thanks for your suggestion. Thanks, Mark -Original Message- From: Cutter (CF-Talk) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:09 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Settle an argument for me Mark, I can't see how they could reverse engineer