To: CF-Talk
Sent: Mon Jun 11 06:09:25 2007
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
Yes but his consideration of going BD is that he already has written CFML
code and that he has been told .Net is better in under Loads.
Please try to keep up with conversation.
On 6/11/07
Medical
Association). This was on a NT4 server (donât remember how much memory).
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 11:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
Well originally they ran CF5
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
He could port to BD with little or no changes to code.
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered
1/ Will CF8 have equal or better integration with .NET compared to
Bluedragon.Net?
No. CF8 is still written in Java, and its .NET integration is done using a
Java-to-.NET bridge licensed from a third party. BlueDragon.NET on the other
hand is a 100% pure .NET implementation. Compared to
1/ Will CF8 have equal or better integration with .NET
compared to Bluedragon.Net?
No. It will let you invoke .NET assemblies, but CF 8 is not a .NET
interpreter or compiler as BD.NET is.
... my concern for using CFMX was sparked
by another thread on this forum where Tim Uzzanti who is an
On 6/9/07, m g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2/ My main reason for consider Bluedragon.NET over CFMX is not due to Flash
Remoting but rather to my main concern of .NET touted as being far superior
in handling significant loads and simultaneous requests than CFMX...
Last week I attended the
Below is the introduction to an article written by Jeff Prosise from Wintellect:
Enjoy,
Mike Chabot
Scalable Apps with Asynchronous Programming in ASP.NET
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/07/03/WickedCode/
[quote]
Most Web sites built with ASP.NET aren't very scalable. They suffer a
, 2007 2:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
1/ Will CF8 have equal or better integration with .NET
compared to Bluedragon.Net?
No. It will let you invoke .NET assemblies, but CF 8 is not a .NET
interpreter or compiler as BD.NET is.
... my
Actually that runs on .NET via BD, so it's not the best example in
this argument...
On 6/11/07, Kevin Aebig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... a bunch of crap. There are plenty of high-volume sites using CF.
No doubt. Two words as one... MySpace. If that isn't the most defining
example of a high
: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 12:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
Actually that runs on .NET via BD, so it's not the best example in
this argument...
On 6/11/07, Kevin Aebig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
application, I don't know what is.
!k
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 2:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
1/ Will CF8 have equal or better integration with .NET
compared
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
Actually that runs on .NET via BD, so it's not the best example in
this argument...
On 6/11/07, Kevin Aebig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... a bunch of crap. There are plenty of high-volume sites using CF.
No doubt. Two words
Yes but his consideration of going BD is that he already has written CFML
code and that he has been told .Net is better in under Loads.
Please try to keep up with conversation.
On 6/11/07, Kevin Aebig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well you have a point, but given that he's considering going BD as
Thanks for all the responses.
What I am thinking after some research, is to use Bluedragon.Net as the app
server as it has got very good write-ups and has the ability to integrate
seamlessly into the .NET framework + will enable me to preserve all the CFML
work that I have done and I will also
Thanks for all the responses.
What I am thinking after some research, is to use Bluedragon.Net as the app
server as it has got very good write-ups and has the ability to integrate
seamlessly into the .NET framework + will enable me to preserve all the CFML
work that I have done and I will also
But only on Windows Servers, and Coldfusion V8 will also have .Net support.
On 6/9/07, m g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the responses.
What I am thinking after some research, is to use Bluedragon.Net as the
app server as it has got very good write-ups and has the ability to
-
From: Andrew Scott
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Jun 09 08:44:18 2007
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
But only on Windows Servers, and Coldfusion V8 will also have .Net support.
On 6/9/07, m g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all the responses.
What I am
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Jun 09 08:44:18 2007
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
But only on Windows Servers, and Coldfusion V8 will also have .Net
support.
On 6/9/07, m g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for all
this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Jun 09 10:25:44 2007
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
True,
The question I will ask
Thanks...
1/ Will CF8 have equal or better integration with .NET compared to
Bluedragon.Net?
2/ My main reason for consider Bluedragon.NET over CFMX is not due to Flash
Remoting but rather to my main concern of .NET touted as being far superior in
handling significant loads and simultaneous
What a load of rubbish...
Loads are based on how you design your application, make sure you run plenty
of load tests and the killer is make sure you have the infastructure first.
If your infastructure is wrong or not enough, then the application will fail
under load it is as simple as that.
As
On 6/10/07, m g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cold Fusion MX out of the box has a setting to support no more than
10 simultaneous requests at one time.
Macromedia suggestions that you never exceed 40 and this isn't optimal for a
large scale sites. There are other settings and issues from a server
Thanks...your responses are appreciated as I inexperienced when it comes to
advanced technical concepts and deployment and want to ensure I make the roght
choice before throwing down several thousands of dollars on licenses etc.
Can you suggest any good load testing software for CF besides from
OpenSTA is free, altough it hasn't been updated in a while.
On 6/10/07, m g [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks...your responses are appreciated as I inexperienced when it comes to
advanced technical concepts and deployment and want to ensure I make the
roght choice before throwing down several
You need to load test, whatever your application / technology. If you don't,
whatever you use is gonna be finger in the air and hope.
As for simultaneous requests, I would very much doubt that you will have
that number of users executing a thread at the same time if end client is
Flash.
What
BACKGROUND:
I have developed a Flash Remoting application using
Coldfusion and SQL 2000 and am almost ready to go live.
The remoting application uses many queries/responses to/from
the SQL 2000 database via Coldfusion.
The Flash Remoting application is a game which I hope will
become
On a side note, I would hope that you could take advantage of the features
of flash to handle has much processing as possible. Offloading some of the
smallest tasks from the backend to the client side can greatly reduce the
overhead that's put on the server.
Cheers,
!k
-Original
27 matches
Mail list logo
