Ah! CFHTTP queries! A big item for my personal the wish list:
CFHTTP has the useful ability to take data from a URL and turn it into a query that
you can then manipulate as any query.
1) CFHTTP interprets the data as a comma separated list (CSV) to turn it into a query.
*BUT* it does NOT corre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Theobald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2000 1:36 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
>
>
> Here's one:
>
>
Here's one:
I'd like positional parameters to modules. It would make calling a module so much more
concise. And I'd like that to extend to CF's built in tags too. For example:
instead of
instead of
It could be easily implemented by passing an "attributes" array with the values in the
ord
> i know one of the items that makes me very uncomfortable is
> the apparent code incompatibility on the locking issues. i.e.
> code written for CF server 4.5.1 locking doesn't easily work
> on 4.0 and vice versa..
This isn't really the case. Code using CFLOCK under CF 4.0.1 will work on a
4.5
---Reply to mail from Steve Martin about TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
> You may be aware that when calling custom tags, either using the "CF_"
> syntax, or using "CFMODULE", you can pass a special attribute called
> "ATTRIBUTECOLLECTION", which is a struct of attributes. We use it qui
e-
From: Al Musella, DPM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 3:34 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input - locking
It is probably too big a change for just a service pack - but maybe keep
it in mind for the next point release:
I would lik
It is probably too big a change for just a service pack - but maybe keep
it in mind for the next point release:
I would like to request an option to automatically lock variables. I read
the "best practices" paper on the allaire site that explains why you don't
have it - but you have to und
array. Too
much, too fast could be the hump that broke the camels back.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 12:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
I gave up on this dream months a
array. Too
much, too fast could be the hump that broke the camels back.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 12:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
I gave up on this dream months a
-Original Message-
From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 12:36 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
I gave up on this dream months ago. I now exclusively use the online
documentation. Someone else has made
I'll second that!
Since we're on the documentation here are some gripes of my own:
Why don't the hard copy docs have the TAG NAMES or FUNCTION NAMES printed at the
header or footers or at the top of each page? It's terribly inconvenient to find
anything. If you flip through the book 75% of the
have
to appease thier customers anyways.
Bob Everland
-Original Message-
From: Steve Bernard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2000 11:53 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
To some this may seem trivial but, the PDF documentation H
To some this may seem trivial but, the PDF documentation HAS to get fixed.
For many this is the only documentation that they have for 4.5.x and quite
frankly, it sucks. It's not the content, it's the usability. In earlier
versions, especially the 4.0.x series, the included and downloadable PDF
doc
To some this may seem trivial but, the PDF documentation HAS to get fixed.
For many this is the only documentation that they have for 4.5.x and quite
frankly, it sucks. It's not the content, it's the usability. In earlier
versions, especially the 4.0.x series, the included and downloadable PDF
doc
At 08:50 AM 9/27/00 , you wrote:
>ColdFusion Service Pack 2 is under construction, and I'd like to get your
>feedback on what you believe to be Must-Be-Fixed items.
i know one of the items that makes me very uncomfortable is the apparent
code incompatibility on the locking issues. i.e. code wri
Re: CFHTTP building a query: the CSV parsing is broken as follows:
If you specify a text qualifier then EVERY field must be surrounded by that text
qualifier or CFHTTP gives an error.
I would expect that a very common source of CSV files is from Microsoft Excel. When
Excel saves CSV files it O
age-
> From: Peter Theobald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 12:22 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
>
>
> Sigh...
>
> I'm waiting for
t;
>Time will have to tell on this one.
>
>
>
>-Jesse
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peter Theobald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2000 1:46 AM
>> To: CF-Talk
>> Subject: Re: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion
Peter, someone should be contacting you shortly for details.
Thanks
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:50:36 -0400
From: Peter Theobald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Damon Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Inpu
sybase.com/nntp/nd33.nsf/docid/c403d2b1120d10c5bcbc605e
f832ba6f
-
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 01:45:39 -0400
From: Peter Theobald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Damon Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
Message-ID: &
September 28, 2000 1:46 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
>
>
> Thread-safe Sybase drivers on Linux would be nice :-)
>
> At 08:50 AM 9/27/00 -0400, Damon Cooper wrote:
> >Folks,
> >
> >ColdFusion Service Pack 2 is
Cold Fusion Studio crashes a Win98 system every time due to resource problems.
At 08:50 AM 9/27/00 -0400, Damon Cooper wrote:
>Folks,
>
>ColdFusion Service Pack 2 is under construction, and I'd like to get your
>feedback on what you believe to be Must-Be-Fixed items.
>
>While Service Pack 1 focu
Thread-safe Sybase drivers on Linux would be nice :-)
At 08:50 AM 9/27/00 -0400, Damon Cooper wrote:
>Folks,
>
>ColdFusion Service Pack 2 is under construction, and I'd like to get your
>feedback on what you believe to be Must-Be-Fixed items.
>
>While Service Pack 1 focused heavily on stability
I know I know I know.sorry
> --
> From: Steve Martin[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 September 2000 14:46
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
>
> Adam,
> I did. I also copied it to the list for the b
, September 27, 2000 14:27
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
>
>
> Sorry to be a bit of a bore, but read his email. You should email him
> directly.
>
> > --
> > From: Steve Martin[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > S
hmmm you get breaks
-Original Message-
From: Reynolds, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 September 2000 14:41
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
Dohapologies in the middle of a code crisis...scanned his
email...during a 10 second
Dohapologies in the middle of a code crisis...scanned his
email...during a 10 second break :)
> --
> From: Heath Lord[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 September 2000 14:39
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Inpu
#
> > if you have
> > one.
But, read his email anyway.
Heath
-Original Message-
From: Reynolds, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Input
Sorry to be a bit of a bore,
Sorry to be a bit of a bore, but read his email. You should email him
directly.
> --
> From: Steve Martin[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 27 September 2000 14:22
> To: CF-Talk
> Cc: Phil
> Subject: RE: TO ALL: Request for ColdFusion SP2 Inp
Damon,
I haven't seen this raised as an issue elsewhere so I'll mention it to you.
It isn't so much something that is broken than a change in behaviour between
4.01 and 4.5 which had the effect of breaking some of our code which relied
on the 4.01 behaviour. Note also that this change in behaviour
Damon,
This is great! We appreciate that Allaire is working with CF developers.
-David Shadovitz
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000 08:50:44 -0400 Damon Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> Folks,
>
> ColdFusion Service Pack 2 is under construction, and I'd like to get
> your
> feedback on what you believe
31 matches
Mail list logo