RE: Testing Assignment

Implement it as a CFX? :) -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 6:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Testing Assignment Only problem is that formatbasen will fail if the number is to high. It overloads what CF sees

Re: Testing Assignment

them. I'll include the code for cf_longmod as well as others in it. Implement it as a CFX? :) -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 6:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Testing Assignment Only problem

Re: Testing Assignment

I'm holding back from posting my tag result to the gallery so I can see what others will try. If anyone wants the tag now without trying to do it themselves, contact me off list. Something like this? cfSetting enableCFOutputOnly="yes" cfScript // 2 vars for tag: // ip = address to translate //

Re: Testing Assignment

I know thats not exactly what you asked but its one way to do dotless IP's :) I realize some are HEX and some are long binary. I got reply happy ;) - Original Message - From: Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 1:11 PM Subject: Testing

Re: Testing Assignment

They're hex addresses as well? I didn't know that. My solution was: CFPARAM NAME="Attributes.IP" TYPE="String" CFPARAM NAME="Attributes.IPName" DEFAULT="IP" TYPE="String" CFSET SetVariable('caller.'attributes.ipname, (ListGetAt(Attributes.IP, 1, '.')*16777216)+(ListGetAt(Attributes.IP, 2,

RE: Testing Assignment

Short and sweet, since I had a couple of minutes: CFSET IP=Attributes.IP CFSET Dotless = 0 CFSET Octets = ListLen(IP,".") CFLOOP From="1" To="#Octets#" Index="i" CFSET Dotless=Dotless + (ListGetAt(IP,i,".") * (256 ^ (Octets-i))) /cfloop CFSET Caller.Dotless=Dotless Chris Evans [EMAIL

RE: Testing Assignment

Well, if you want to hardcode it. You'll have to re-code for IPv6 :). Chris Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.fuseware.com -Original Message- From: Brandon Whitaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Testing Assignment

Re: Testing Assignment

Here is a real quicky I put together over lunch: == Start Code == cfparam name="Attributes.IP" default="0.0.0.0" cfif ListLen(Attributes.IP, ".") NEQ 4 OR ListGetAt(Attributes.IP, "1", ".") EQ 0 !--- Error catching goes

RE: Testing Assignment

[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 1:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Testing Assignment I'm holding back from posting my tag result to the gallery so I can see what others will try. If anyone wants the tag now without trying to do it themselves, contact me off list

Re: Testing Assignment

Please excuse the wrapping imposed by Eudora... At 12:52 PM 7/10/2000 -0500, you wrote: Here is a real quicky I put together over lunch: == Start Code == cfparam name="Attributes.IP" default="0.0.0.0" cfif ListLen(Attributes.IP,

Re: Testing Assignment

:) - Original Message - From: Russel Madere [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 1:54 PM Subject: RE: Testing Assignment Will IPv6 work with dotless IP addresses? I haven't stayed up on it. Russel At 01:57 PM 7/10/2000 -0400, you wrote: Well, if you want

RE: Testing Assignment

Hey, that was more fun than work! Thoughts for future versions . . . reverse (dotless to dotted), octal addresses, hexadecimal addresses, combinations of hex, octal and dotted, masked ip addresses with multiples of 256 added to a dotted IP or multiples of 4294967296 added to dotless IPs. I

Re: Testing Assignment

I think that we should take all the options that you and others have mentioned and make a single CF_IP that will have options for them all. Make it a 'group project' with myself or someone else as the primary caretaker (a la open source software). Hey, that was more fun than work! Thoughts

Re: Testing Assignment

] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 3:42 PM Subject: Re: Testing Assignment I think that we should take all the options that you and others have mentioned and make a single CF_IP that will have options for them all. Make it a 'group project' with myself or someone else as the primary caretaker (a la

RE: Testing Assignment

Me and a co worker *cough* cam *cough* were discussing this and it would be a lot easier to write the range checking code using the array converted to hex. The InputBaseN tag would work well. Okay ill write my version of how I would do it :P Okay here goes some code, forgive the formatting

RE: Testing Assignment

Looks good, although I have one thought to throw in... At 05:47 PM 7/10/00 -0400, you wrote: sniped !--- Can convert multiple IP's using large dim arrays?? *shrug* --- CFLOOP LIST="#ipAddress1#" DELIMITERS="." INDEX="i" CFSET ipAddress1Arr[loopCnt] = i CFSET loopCnt = loopCnt

Re: Testing Assignment

Only problem is that formatbasen will fail if the number is to high. It overloads what CF sees as an integer. Me and a co worker *cough* cam *cough* were discussing this and it would be a lot easier to write the range checking code using the array converted to hex. The InputBaseN tag would

RE: Testing Assignment

arithmetic. Michael J. Sheldon Internet Applications Developer Phone: 480.699.1084 http://www.desertraven.com/ PGP Key Available on Request -Original Message- From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2000 15:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Testing Assignment

RE: Testing Assignment

: Testing Assignment True, it will fail for all IPs in the 128.XXX.XXX.XXX range or higher. Worse yet, the behavior changed from CF 4.0 to 4.5 I had several functions from a year ago that had to be hacked badly in order to keep them working. The moral of the story? CF sucks giant rocks when it comes