Yes. The function can be made private thru setting access=private, and
arguments can be set to either required or not: required="true" and you can
use the Display Name or Hints to say whether required or not and inform of
any default value.
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Paul Spitzer [ma
ables!).
...and I do. Wherever I can get away with it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:18 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: UDF in CFC's - was: CFC Issues
>
>
> On Wednesday, Aug
ables!).
...and I do. Wherever I can get away with it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:18 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: UDF in CFC's - was: CFC Issues
>
>
> On Wednesday, Aug
mike are we starting to see some duplicate posts from last week?
tw
tony weeg
sr. web applications architect
navtrak, inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.navtrak.net
office 410.548.2337
fax 410.860.2337
-Original Message-
From: Paul Spitzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 20
> Another great reason for CFMX6.1, vars still need to be at the top but
> they can now be inside a CFSCRIPT block.
Hey, I wasn't aware of this, many thanks for the tip!
I just tested and it really make my day :-)
Massimo Foti
Certified Dreamweaver MX Developer
Certif
Paul Spitzer wrote:
>>thinking of writing some sort of preprocessor that would convert a
>>cfscript-like syntax
>
>
> that's a great idea! New project!
>
An hour or so after work and it appears to work with a UDF'd page...
Next step, components. Maybe not, need to cycle home before it gets da
ables!).
...and I do. Wherever I can get away with it.
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:18 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: UDF in CFC's - was: CFC Issues
>
>
> On Wednesday, Aug
> >>
> >> function boring() { return now(); }
> >>
> > wow!.. I didn't know you could do that.
>
> Why would anyone want to?
>
> You can't set the access type, you can't specify the return type, you
> can't specify any argument types.
offers a lot of benefits, but many still like a lot the
scri
> thinking of writing some sort of preprocessor that would convert a
> cfscript-like syntax
that's a great idea! New project!
> -Original Message-
> From: Oliver Tupman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 1:39 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subje
>> component documentation
> You said components above
I was just referring to the cfcexplorer.
>check the size of the arguments array
nice.. didn't think of that.
> -Original Message-
>
>
> > wow!.. I didn't know you could do that. Is there *any* way
> > to make them private? I n
Original Message-
From: Massimo Foti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2003 10:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: UDF in CFC's - was: CFC Issues
> >>
> >> function boring() { return now(); }
> >>
> > wow!.. I didn't know you cou
> Unfortunately not, neither is there a way to stop them
> producing output
> like through the CFML cffunction attribute output="false". I was
> thinking of writing some sort of preprocessor that would convert a
> cfscript-like syntax such as
Incorrect. Well not exactly.
A tag based UDF a
ot; - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 11:18 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: UDF in CFC's - was: CFC Issues
>
>
> On Wednesday, Aug 20, 2003, at 17:53 US/Pacific, Paul Spitzer wrote:
>
> wow!.. I didn't know you could do that. Is there *any* way
> to make them private? I noticed that the component
> documentation says all the arguments are required, is it
> possible to declare which arguments are required and which
> ones aren't? What else can you do with this... playing w
Paul Spitzer wrote:
> Paul (wishing I could use script syntax for everything)
Join the club!
> wow!.. I didn't know you could do that. Is there *any* way to make them
> private?
Unfortunately not, neither is there a way to stop them producing output
like through the CFML cffunction attrib
On Wednesday, Aug 20, 2003, at 17:53 US/Pacific, Paul Spitzer wrote:
>>
>> function boring() { return now(); }
>>
> wow!.. I didn't know you could do that.
Why would anyone want to?
You can't set the access type, you can't specify the return type, you
can't specify any argument
16 matches
Mail list logo
