Re: advanced list

Douglas, If I understand the intent of your original question, I would recommend the list that ACFUG (Atlanta CFUG) hosts: http://www.acfug.org/ -- Very little chit chat and the questions are generally more advanced. Regards, --John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > My apologies to the list and for

RE: advanced list

> Especially if we can make it an expanding FAQ, then > (hopefully) it'll cover > about 70-80% of the questions that get repeated... and it'll > be easier than > searching through the archives - especially since I currently > have over > 40,000 CF-Talk messages in my Outlook That's how I've b

RE: advanced list

> Difference between design and implementation. It was designed and intended > as a true FAQ where you could just hit the CFMAIL section to know > something > about it. Problem was in putting info in. > I wanted to hire someone to read the posts and write FAQs for it but the > problem was cash. Di

RE: advanced list

> Difference between design and implementation. It was designed and intended > as a true FAQ where you could just hit the CFMAIL section to know > something > about it. Problem was in putting info in. > I wanted to hire someone to read the posts and write FAQs for it but the > problem was cash. Di

Re: advanced list

Difference between design and implementation. It was designed and intended as a true FAQ where you could just hit the CFMAIL section to know something about it. Problem was in putting info in. I wanted to hire someone to read the posts and write FAQs for it but the problem was cash. Didn't think t

RE: advanced list

> There's a FAQ on the HoF site for the last year or so. Problem > is, its just > not used much and not much has gone into it. That's on the list for > upgrading. In addition, a list member who's name escapes me at the moment > has his own CF-Talk FAQ that he offered up as a link. Once he's ready

Re: advanced list

There's a FAQ on the HoF site for the last year or so. Problem is, its just not used much and not much has gone into it. That's on the list for upgrading. In addition, a list member who's name escapes me at the moment has his own CF-Talk FAQ that he offered up as a link. Once he's ready with it, I

RE: advanced list

My apologies to the list and for starting a thread that went way too long. The intent of my question concerning other more advanced list-servs for CF stuff was not to slight anyone on this list. This list is quite useful, helpful, and attended by some very knowledgeable people. I was just loo

RE: advanced list

> > I have to agree. I like the list the way it is. > > > > We all have delete keys. Let the list live as is. > > The lists are staying as is, I was talking about a new experimental list. I like the CF-Talk list, but once it's complete we definitely need the FAQ on the HOF website (if Michael's

RE: advanced list

Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 12:55 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: advanced list > I have to agree. I like the list the way it is. > > We all have delete keys. Let the list live as is. The lists are staying as is, I was talk

Re: advanced list

> I have to agree. I like the list the way it is. > > We all have delete keys. Let the list live as is. The lists are staying as is, I was talking about a new experimental list. ~~ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official bo

Re: advanced list

> Michael > > I like the cf-talk list the way it is. I am a member of several > moderated lists and they leave a lot to be desire. CF-Talk will not be changing. I'm defining a new, extended list that'll be both more limited than CF-Talk and more restrictive. Also, due to its nature it'll be slowe

Re: advanced list

> > Only a few people can post. Posters are > > set by recommendation from a current poster. > > Can you compile a 'grandfathered' list of historically productive > cf-talk members in order to streamline the start up of the posting > privileged list? Already done. We've got a number of people who

Re: advanced list

I agree. While my delete button gets overheated from time to time, that's a small penalty for the usefulness of the list. I think Al's suggestions below are more practical than setting up a new list. The new rules, whichever list, should identify whether messages like this one are off topic.

Re: advanced list

I don't like the idea of a new list. Face it. 90% of us are going to join both lists anyway. Where is the savings? I run about 10 mailing list, and have run into this problem of too much off topic stuff a few times. I think I found a way to stop it Just assign a few volunteers to be the po

Re: advanced list

2001 11:16:15 -0500 > To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: advanced list > > I have to agree. I like the list the way it is. > > We all have delete keys. Let the list live as is. > > > > At 08:36 PM 2/17/01 -0700, you wrote: >> At 8:27 PM

Re: advanced list

I have to agree. I like the list the way it is. We all have delete keys. Let the list live as is. At 08:36 PM 2/17/01 -0700, you wrote: >At 8:27 PM -0500 2/17/01, Michael Dinowitz wrote: > >OK, I've heard the call for an advanced list and I I'll see what I can do > > >Michael > >I like the c

Re: advanced list

At 8:27 PM -0500 2/17/01, Michael Dinowitz wrote: >OK, I've heard the call for an advanced list and I I'll see what I can do Michael I like the cf-talk list the way it is. I am a member of several moderated lists and they leave a lot to be desire. Sometimes, something appears on the cf-talk

Re: advanced list

Quite a project, Micahel. Looks good. A couple of comments interspersed below . > OK, I've heard the call for an advanced list and I I'll see what I can do > over the next 2 days. Why 2 days? Because I'm taking down post.office and > putting up the iMS listserver (which I'm writing from scratc

Re: advanced list

gt; > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 5:28 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: advanced list > > > > > > OK, I've heard the call for an advanced list and I I'll see what I can do > > over the nex

RE: advanced list

1 5:28 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: advanced list > > > OK, I've heard the call for an advanced list and I I'll see what I can do > over the next 2 days. Why 2 days? Because I'm taking down post.office and > putting up the iMS listserver (which I'm writi

Re: advanced list

OK, I've heard the call for an advanced list and I I'll see what I can do over the next 2 days. Why 2 days? Because I'm taking down post.office and putting up the iMS listserver (which I'm writing from scratch now). Once its up, I'll set up a CF mailing list that's moderated only, but of a special

Re: advanced list

You cant say it any better than that. "Jon Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 001d01c09869$0b37d3d0$a41f88d8@ns2">news:001d01c09869$0b37d3d0$a41f88d8@ns2... > Ask your question and it shall be answered. I have never seen a question no > matter how advanced that has not been addressed i

Re: advanced list

On 2/16/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] penned: >Can someone suggest another ColdFusion list-serv with more advanced topics and >where the bulk of the members actually discuss ColdFusion topics, not jobs, or >how to build simple JavaScript stuff? They don't make mailing lists that stay on topic. Mainly bec

Re: advanced list

Ask your question and it shall be answered. I have never seen a question no matter how advanced that has not been addressed in this group. The beta.allaire.com forums are tend to be more advanced but are not focused on getting actual things done as this group is. If you think Dave Watts,Steve Druc

Re: advanced list

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 4:11 PM Subject: advanced list > > > Can someone suggest another ColdFusion list-serv with more advanced topics and > where the bulk of the members actually discuss ColdFusion

RE: advanced list

The Fusebox list is more specific and you might want to try that out, as well as CF-Talk. I don't think there are any advanced lists, per se. Hal Helms == See ColdFusionTraining.com for info on "Best Practices with ColdFusion & Fusebox" training == -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: advanced list

Doug, Not really. I've been on several listservs, in different areas, and you'll always find "junk" among the posts, which increases as posts increase. Some of the CFUG lists tend to be a bit more "on-topic", though the quantity tends to be much less, and you'll have fewer "experts" (which may

RE: advanced list

Was that the sound of a whip cracking? Ouch... Joby Bednar Director of Internet Design iNEOgroup.com http://www.ineogroup.com Fusing your Dreams and the Web, Together as One [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cell: 949-283-5138 Personal Fax: 208-485-1170