RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...

2002-09-30 Thread Adrian Lynch
Whenever I right an SP I use.. CREATE PROCEDURE someSP @somthing AS int, @somethingelse AS varchar(50) I don't know if not using the AS is ok or not but give it a go, see if it fixes it Ade -Original Message- From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...

2002-09-30 Thread Adams, Stephen
** WESTMINSTER CITY COUNCIL Please refer to the disclaimer beneath this message ** YOu can comment out the call to the stored procedure and then output all the

RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...

2002-09-30 Thread Joshua Tipton
having the problem was using CFMX and M$SQL. Hope this helps you out and that I didnt misunderstand that whole think last week. Josh -Original Message- From: Adams, Stephen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 7:31 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: more cfstoredproc issues

RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...

2002-09-30 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Thanks for the suggestion josh. I didn't think I had used any cf_sql_date flags... I did a search and replace on wwwroot including subfolders just to be sure and it didn't replace anything, so... I do not know if this may be the underlying cause of the error but I do know that if sql is your

RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...

2002-09-30 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Figured it was a long shot, but I tried it -- no dice. Thanks for the suggestion Ade, Whenever I right an SP I use.. CREATE PROCEDURE someSP somthing AS int, somethingelse AS varchar(50) I don't know if not using the AS is ok or not but give it a go, see if it fixes it

RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...

2002-09-30 Thread Costas Piliotis
Dude... In your cfprocparam tag, you write this: cfprocparam type=in dbvarname=LibraryID You should write: cfprocparam type=in dbvarname=@LibraryID AFAIK, you need the @ symobol. Also, the word AS is unnecessary... You don't need it for any variable declaration in a stored proc.

RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...

2002-09-30 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Dude... In your cfprocparam tag, you write this: cfprocparam type=in dbvarname=LibraryID You should write: cfprocparam type=in dbvarname=@LibraryID AFAIK, you need the @ symobol. hmmm... I'll try it, but I've got dozens if not hundreds of stored procedure calls in this app, and none of

RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...

2002-09-30 Thread Costas Piliotis
version... -Original Message- From: S.Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 9:36 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: more cfstoredproc issues ... Dude... In your cfprocparam tag, you write this: cfprocparam type=in dbvarname=LibraryID You should write

RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...

2002-09-30 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
the wrong var name just switches to the first version... -Original Message- From: S.Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 9:36 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: more cfstoredproc issues ... Dude... In your cfprocparam tag, you write this: cfprocparam

RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...SOLVED

2002-09-30 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
Never underestimate the power of context highlighting! Which in this case didn't catch the fact that a CFML comment ( !--- ) in the middle of my stored procedure was terminated with an HTML comment... ( -- ) ... sigh... which was the source of the problem... How did I figure this out? I ran this

RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...

2002-09-30 Thread Costas Piliotis
didn't help huh... -Original Message- From: S.Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 11:13 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: more cfstoredproc issues ... Actually the names in the dbvarname attribute are completely ignored by the cf-server as far as I

RE: more cfstoredproc issues ...

2002-09-30 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
: S.Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 11:13 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: more cfstoredproc issues ... Actually the names in the dbvarname attribute are completely ignored by the cf-server as far as I or anyone else has been able to determine. They have

RE: more cfstoredproc issues -- ARGH!!

2002-09-19 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
automatically converts the Char into a date object - as long as the format is correct. -mk -Original Message- From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 8:52 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: more cfstoredproc issues -- ARGH!! The other thing that really

Re: more cfstoredproc issues -- ARGH!!

2002-09-18 Thread Zac Spitzer
S. Isaac Dealey wrote: Yea, it turned out to be the cf_sql_date that was causing the wrong number of parameters error message... so changing that to cf_sql_timestamp solved the problem... Better support for cfstoredproc ( naming and better error handling in particular. ) would be _great_ to

Re: more cfstoredproc issues -- ARGH!!

2002-09-18 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
S. Isaac Dealey wrote: Yea, it turned out to be the cf_sql_date that was causing the wrong number of parameters error message... so changing that to cf_sql_timestamp solved the problem... Better support for cfstoredproc ( naming and better error handling in particular. ) would be _great_