> 1/ Will CF8 have equal or better integration with .NET compared to
> Bluedragon.Net?
No. CF8 is still written in Java, and its ".NET integration" is done using a
Java-to-.NET bridge licensed from a third party. BlueDragon.NET on the other
hand is a "100% pure .NET" implementation. Compared to
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
He could port to BD with little or no changes to code.
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Register
(American Medical
Association). This was on a NT4 server (donât remember how much memory).
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 11:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
Well originally the
w Scott
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Mon Jun 11 06:09:25 2007
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
Yes but his consideration of going BD is that he already has written CFML
code and that he has been told .Net is better in under Loads.
Please try to keep up with conversation.
Yes but his consideration of going BD is that he already has written CFML
code and that he has been told .Net is better in under Loads.
Please try to keep up with conversation.
On 6/11/07, Kevin Aebig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well you have a point, but given that he's considering going BD
-Talk
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
Actually that runs on .NET via BD, so it's not the best example in
this argument...
On 6/11/07, Kevin Aebig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ... a bunch of crap. There are plenty of high-volume sites us
most defining
> example of a high load application, I don't know what is.
>
> !k
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 2:13 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flas
e-
> From: James Holmes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 12:40 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
>
> Actually that runs on .NET via BD, so it's not the best example in
> this argument...
>
&
Actually that runs on .NET via BD, so it's not the best example in
this argument...
On 6/11/07, Kevin Aebig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ... a bunch of crap. There are plenty of high-volume sites using CF.
>
> No doubt. Two words as one... MySpace. If that isn't the most defining
> example of a
nt: Sunday, June 10, 2007 2:13 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
> 1/ Will CF8 have equal or better integration with .NET
> compared to Bluedragon.Net?
No. It will let you invoke .NET assemblies, but CF 8 is not a .NET
interpreter or compiler a
Below is the introduction to an article written by Jeff Prosise from Wintellect:
Enjoy,
Mike Chabot
Scalable Apps with Asynchronous Programming in ASP.NET
http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/07/03/WickedCode/
[quote]
Most Web sites built with ASP.NET aren't very scalable. They suffer a
self
On 6/9/07, m g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2/ My main reason for consider Bluedragon.NET over CFMX is not due to Flash
> Remoting but rather to my main concern of .NET touted as being far superior
> in handling significant loads and simultaneous requests than CFMX...
Last week I attended the Mi
> 1/ Will CF8 have equal or better integration with .NET
> compared to Bluedragon.Net?
No. It will let you invoke .NET assemblies, but CF 8 is not a .NET
interpreter or compiler as BD.NET is.
> ... my concern for using CFMX was sparked
> by another thread on this forum where Tim Uzzanti who is
OpenSTA is free, altough it hasn't been updated in a while.
On 6/10/07, m g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks...your responses are appreciated as I inexperienced when it comes to
> advanced technical concepts and deployment and want to ensure I make the
> roght choice before throwing down seve
Thanks...your responses are appreciated as I inexperienced when it comes to
advanced technical concepts and deployment and want to ensure I make the roght
choice before throwing down several thousands of dollars on licenses etc.
Can you suggest any good load testing software for CF besides from
On 6/10/07, m g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Cold Fusion MX out of the box has a setting to support no more than
10 simultaneous requests at one time.
> Macromedia suggestions that you never exceed 40 and this isn't optimal for a
> large scale sites. There are other settings and issues from a serve
What a load of rubbish...
Loads are based on how you design your application, make sure you run plenty
of load tests and the killer is make sure you have the infastructure first.
If your infastructure is wrong or not enough, then the application will fail
under load it is as simple as that.
As fo
Thanks...
1/ Will CF8 have equal or better integration with .NET compared to
Bluedragon.Net?
2/ My main reason for consider Bluedragon.NET over CFMX is not due to Flash
Remoting but rather to my main concern of .NET touted as being far superior in
handling significant loads and simultaneous re
ithin this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Jun 09 10:25:44 2007
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
True,
The ques
ot necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
> Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Scott
> To: CF-Talk
> Sent: Sat Jun 09 08:44:18 2007
> Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
>
>
al Message-
From: Andrew Scott
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Sat Jun 09 08:44:18 2007
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
But only on Windows Servers, and Coldfusion V8 will also have .Net support.
On 6/9/07, m g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks
But only on Windows Servers, and Coldfusion V8 will also have .Net support.
On 6/9/07, m g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the responses.
>
> What I am thinking after some research, is to use Bluedragon.Net as the
> app server as it has got very good write-ups and has the ability
Thanks for all the responses.
What I am thinking after some research, is to use Bluedragon.Net as the app
server as it has got very good write-ups and has the ability to integrate
seamlessly into the .NET framework + will enable me to preserve all the CFML
work that I have done and I will also
Thanks for all the responses.
What I am thinking after some research, is to use Bluedragon.Net as the app
server as it has got very good write-ups and has the ability to integrate
seamlessly into the .NET framework + will enable me to preserve all the CFML
work that I have done and I will also
ssage-
From: m g [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 11:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
Hi,
BACKGROUND:
I have developed a "Flash Remoting" application using Coldfusion and SQL
2000 and am almost ready to go liv
> BACKGROUND:
> I have developed a "Flash Remoting" application using
> Coldfusion and SQL 2000 and am almost ready to go live.
> The remoting application uses many queries/responses to/from
> the SQL 2000 database via Coldfusion.
> The Flash Remoting application is a game which I hope will
> be
ecessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: m g
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Jun 07 06:16:49 2007
Subject: Simultaneous Requests/CF vs ASP.NET for Flash Remoting
Hi,
BACKGROUND:
I have developed a "Flash R
Hi,
BACKGROUND:
I have developed a "Flash Remoting" application using Coldfusion and SQL 2000
and am almost ready to go live.
The remoting application uses many queries/responses to/from the SQL 2000
database via Coldfusion.
The Flash Remoting application is a game which I hope will become popul
28 matches
Mail list logo
