Um, the second one worked for me from both FF 2 and IE 7.
On 3/6/07, Les Mizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At this point, I'm totally confused! If I define the enctype, Explorer
errors out.
If I do a cfdump from the two forms, I get interesting results as well.
Deanna Schneider wrote:
Um, the second one worked for me from both FF 2 and IE 7.
https://www.aaintl.com/test.cfm
I added regular HTML forms to the test page, and even the HTML form
generates the error in IE for both myself and the client in IE 6 with
the enctype defined.
I've lowered all
-Original Message-
From: Les Mizzell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 2:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: enctype problem - test page up - totally baffled at this point
At this point, I'm totally confused! If I define the enctype, Explorer
errors out.
If I do a cfdump
https://www.aaintl.com/includes/cfform.js can be downloaded by putting in
the direct url, but Both
https://www.aaintl.com/CFIDE/scripts/cfform.js and
https://www.aaintl.com/CFIDE/scripts/masks.js give me a 404 error.
The actual code only has:
script type=text/javascript
from both FF 2 and IE 7.
https://www.aaintl.com/test.cfm
I added regular HTML forms to the test page, and even the HTML form
generates the error in IE for both myself and the client in IE 6 with
the enctype defined.
I've lowered all my security settings to ZERO (permit everything) just
Deanna Schneider wrote:
Check this out. Totally randomly I was researching this seemingly
non-related issue (ssl 3.0) - but I think it's the answer to your
problem as well.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/318815
Well, my local Win 2000 is current with all the service packs.
It really looks
For giggles and grins - try it on a non-https page.
On 3/6/07, Les Mizzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deanna Schneider wrote:
Check this out. Totally randomly I was researching this seemingly
non-related issue (ssl 3.0) - but I think it's the answer to your
problem as well.
Deanna Schneider wrote:
For giggles and grins - try it on a non-https page.
Yup - works without the https:
http://www.aaintl.com/test.cfm
OK, that would lead me to believe that something on the server has
changed regarding the security certificates.
Gotta find a work-around because on the
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/318815
Here's a thought - a windows update patch applied by the user (like
myself) may have broken this and it's not on the server.
Looking at my history, a bunch of updates were applied around Feb 21st,
which is shortly before the problem began happening. That
I've maybe got a further clue here now...
If I go into the securities settings in Explorer under the Advanced
tab, and turn OFF Use SSL 3.0, the form seems to work as it should -
at least initial test is showing that.
OK, that would seem to make it something on my LOCAL machine then -
caused
IE 6, I didn't seem to have a problem. Just default IE settings...
Will
~|
Deploy Web Applications Quickly across the enterprise with ColdFusion MX7
Flex 2.
Free Trial
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/
IE 6, I didn't seem to have a problem. Just default IE settings...
It's got me completely stumped. I think I've narrowed it down to a
Windows security update, but I haven't figured out which one yet...
~|
Create robust
Works for me, on XP Pro (latest updates, etc.) with IE 6 or 7...
:-/
I don't know if the admins would want to turn off ssl 3, or change
the settings or not, but there are things that can be done on
the server side, apparently. Setting the ssl 3 timeout to 300, etc..
Sounds strange, and also
I am working with a JAVA web service, and I get back an array of objects with
methods to access the data.
One of these methods is getExtendedFields() which will only exist if there are
any extended fields. So I need to be able to test if this method actually
exists before I bother trying
To: CF-Talk
Subject: test if method exists
I am working with a JAVA web service, and I get back an array of objects
with methods to access the data.
One of these methods is getExtendedFields() which will only exist if
there are any extended fields. So I need to be able to test if this
method actually
.
One of these methods is getExtendedFields() which will only exist if there
are any extended fields. So I need to be able to test if this method
actually exists before I bother trying to access its methods.
I thought I could do a structkeyexists, but that doesn't work
cfif StructkeyExists(myobjext
How about this? Straight out of the CF manual:
h3IsCustomFunction Example/h3
cfscript
function realUDF() {
return 1;
}
/cfscript
cfset X = 1
!--- Example that fails existence test ---
cfif IsDefined(Foo) AND IsCustomFunction(Foo)
Foo is a UDF.br
/cfif
!--- Example that passes existence test
Testing spam filters
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.14/636 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
4:00 AM
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
ignore
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.14/636 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
4:00 AM
~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7
Experience Flex 2 MX7
Please do not post test messages to this list.
Michael Dinowitz
President: House of Fusion(http://www.houseoffusion.com)
Publisher: Fusion Authority(http://www.fusionauthority.com)
Adobe Community Expert / Advanced Certified ColdFusion Professional
- Original Message -
From
Please do not post test messages to this list.
Michael Dinowitz
President: House of Fusion(http://www.houseoffusion.com)
Publisher: Fusion Authority(http://www.fusionauthority.com)
Adobe Community Expert / Advanced Certified ColdFusion Professional
- Original Message -
From
:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SPAM-MED Another spam filter test
ignore
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.16.14/636 - Release Date: 1/18/2007
4:00 AM
with it?
-Original Message-
From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 9:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SPAM-MED Another spam filter test
ignore
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database
-Talk
Subject: Re: Another spam filter test
I sent this information over to Greg at AHPHosting (who have been giving me
my hosting for something like 8 years) and he'll look into it. I've also
added spam-med to my report list. Anyone posting with spam-low, spam-med,
etc. will get a message
not everyone has that
access though.
cheers
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 9:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Another spam filter test
I sent this information over to Greg at AHPHosting (who have been giving me
my hosting
On Thursday 18 January 2007 14:34, Bobby Hartsfield wrote:
mail.houseoffusion.com claims to be host hof001.houseoffusion.com [but that
host doesn't seem to exist (may be cached); could be a CNAME I don't
check].
Dunno what you are doing, but:
#dig -t mx houseoffusion.com
houseoffusion.com.
Bobby Hartsfield wrote:
Apparently that is causing all cf-talk mail to be flagged as spam
That may be the issue...or it may be related to something I noticed a
while back...
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/thread.cfm/threadid:47910#254138
basically when people send from Outlook,
There was plenty of other non HoF traffic being flagged the same way that
shouldn't have been. They all had DNS issues as well.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Another spam filter test
Bobby
Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Another spam filter test
Bobby Hartsfield wrote:
Apparently that is causing all cf-talk mail to be flagged as spam
That may be the issue...or it may be related to something I
testing.
On 1/18/07, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please do not post test messages to this list.
Michael Dinowitz
President: House of Fusion(http://www.houseoffusion.com)
Publisher: Fusion Authority(http://www.fusionauthority.com)
Adobe Community Expert / Advanced
i didn't see that message. I'm jumping off this list it's taking too much
space on my gmail.
On 1/18/07, atomi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
testing.
On 1/18/07, Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please do not post test messages to this list.
Michael Dinowitz
President: House
test - please ignore.
I have sent in an email previously and have not seen it hit yet.
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456
Hi,
Is there a way to do unit test custom tags?
Johnny
Open-Source CfTagLib
http://code.google.com/p/cfttaglib/
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http
An url cgi.query_string portion contains a link to the same page like this:
#cF2ADC6A9-A611-D291-32A9A4B88AC69FFD
I would like to test if cgi.query_string contains c# with
cgi.query_string contains ##c or
cgi.query_string contains #c
but it cannot find it.
Any help much appreciated
The browser does not pass the # sign or anything after it to the http
server... it doesn't show up in any CGI variables for that reason.
In CFMBB, in order to link directly to a message *AND* use an anchor, I
had to do something like this
thread.cfm?messageid=525#525
Only the browser knows
THE solution. Thank you Rick.
ContiW
--
In CFMBB, in order to link directly to a message *AND* use an anchor, I
had to do something like this
thread.cfm?messageid=525#525
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority
I am working with cfcUnit in an existing application that includes a generator
type functionality. Every time the generator is run, the unit test cfcs are
overwritten wiping out any custom test functions. So, I am trying to use a
cfinclude to include a separate cfm file that has just
Exhibitions.
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Bobby Hartsfield
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Fri Sep 22 02:16:55 2006
Subject: RE: How do I use JS to let someone know a test question needs to be
answered
LOL! Who's your daddy
To add to Charlie's response... use a type
submit it so
they can't circumvent your timer by simply turning off JS
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 8:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: How do I use JS to let someone know a test question needs to be
answered
start
I use JS to let someone know a test question needs to be
answered
Yep, but if they turn off JS they shouldn't be allowed to see anything, if
detected it is off, then you should forward them to you naughty boy
template.
This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Oriel House, 26 The Quadrant
I'll have to admit... I didn't think of that at all ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Peter Boughton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 6:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: How do I use JS to let someone know a test question needs to be
answered
To add to Charlie's
I have a friend working on a testing application for his school class.
He wants to have a field for every question where the value would be a time
limit - say 60 seconds.
So he queries the db for the time limit for the question being presented to the
user. How would we
1. Warn the user his
start with this.
you can mess with the intervals by replacing the static 5000 and 1
with values from the database (just remember it's miliseconds...not
seconds).
html
head
script type=text/javascript
function doSubmit() {
alert(You blew it!);
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 8:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: How do I use JS to let someone know a test question needs to be
answered
start with this.
you can mess with the intervals by replacing the static 5000 and 1
with values from the database (just remember it's miliseconds
Thanks Jeff
I definitely have something weird going on. Whenever I view a PDF generated
report, even yours, all my text is mirror image. If I save the PDF and send it
to somebody else, it is normal. I must have some strange configuration, but
for the life of me, I can not find it. If I
Yeah I finally tracked down and resolved my issue. I had a Font that was a
reversed form of Arial on my system, and some reason the PDF generated by
CFReport would default to this font. That bit is still strange to me, but once
I removed this font and the upside down version of Arial as well
Should that read I am _now_ getting normal reports?
On 9/18/06, Ian Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah I finally tracked down and resolved my issue. I had a Font that was a
reversed form of Arial on my system, and some reason the PDF generated by
CFReport would default to this font.
Should that read I am _now_ getting normal reports?
Why yes, that is exactly what is should read.
Someday, oh someday, I will get around to creating that write what I meant,
not what I typed spell checker.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Does anybody out there have a public, PDF format CFReport file that I can view?
I'm having a weird issue that when I view my pdf format pdf reports the text
is mirror imaged. I've viewed a couple dozen regular pdf files and they appear
normally
It seems to be just me. My coworkers view the
I have contacted you off-list about this.
On 9/15/06, Ian Skinner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody out there have a public, PDF format CFReport file that I can
view? I'm having a weird issue that when I view my pdf format pdf reports
the text is mirror imaged. I've viewed a couple
Thanks Guys! I'm headed off to check this out. This particular server is 4.5
or 5 so you may have helped me find it.
jay
In your caching settings in the cfadmin there is a setting
for multi-homed servers. By default it's configured for
servers that have a single webroot, but if you've got
Hello.
I'm making a change in a production site and it's showing up in test site even
though they are 2 sites, 2 sets of files and IIS has them point to 2 different
ips.
On server they are 2 completely different folders within wwwroot.
let's call one cache.com and the other is beta.cache.com
millerj @ etcnj. com [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello.
I'm making a change in a production site and it's showing up in test site
even though they are 2 sites, 2 sets of files and IIS has them point to 2
different ips.
On server they are 2 completely different folders within wwwroot.
let's call
In your caching settings in the cfadmin there is a setting
for multi-homed servers. By default it's configured for
servers that have a single webroot, but if you've got
multiple web roots sharing your CF server, you need to
disable the option.
I believe that this is disabled by default
cfoutput
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly
CFOUTPUT
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly
No, because the test was to see if you could resist replying. Everyone
who replies fails... oh damn.
On 7/17/06, Rick Root [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will Tomlinson wrote:
This is just a test.
Did I pass?
--
CFAJAX docs and other useful articles:
http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog
This is just a test.
Will
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http
Will Tomlinson wrote:
This is just a test.
Did I pass?
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year
A short test
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four
times a year.
http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly
Back to my AWS work ... using the suggestion of another CF-Talker, I used
structKeyExists to test whether a particular XML node existed. That solved
the isDefined error problem, but now if the element doesn't exist in the
first result set of the results set, it doesn't exist for any items
Ignore
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:242986
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe:
Sorry for the test. Messages I send to cf-talk thru email aren't appearing so
I'm trying through the HOF site . . .
George
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:239807
Archives: http
I have a User.cfc, Manager.cfc and Worker.cfc. Manager and Worker extend
User.
I would like to be able to test whether an instantiated object is a
Worker or a Manager.
Something like cfif isObjectType(#session.currentUser#,
#ttComponents.Manager#)
But I don't know what isObjectType is really
PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 May 2006 17:38
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Test object type
I have a User.cfc, Manager.cfc and Worker.cfc. Manager and Worker extend
User.
I would like to be able to test whether an instantiated object is a
Worker or a Manager.
Something like cfif isObjectType(#session.currentUser
www.bennadel.com
-Original Message-
From: Joelle Tegwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 12:38 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Test object type
I have a User.cfc, Manager.cfc and Worker.cfc. Manager and Worker extend
User.
I would like to be able to test whether an instantiated
you
have now, because you don't know what class you used to instantiate that
object.
~Brad
-Original Message-
From: Joelle Tegwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 11:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Test object type
I have a User.cfc, Manager.cfc and Worker.cfc. Manager
So I assume that you use session.currentUser to hold EITHER a
manager object OR a worker object.
This may be a stupid question since I don't have a lot of oop
experience, but is it bad form to use the same variable name
to store two different types of objects? That seems so
create
-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 12:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Test object type
So I assume that you use session.currentUser to hold EITHER a
manager object OR a worker object.
This may be a stupid question since I don't have a lot of oop
Also, can you create an interface with CFC's, and then implement that interface
with another class? (Like other OOP languages)
~Brad
No not directly. See the writings of Hal Helms and others on why this is not
so good for CF.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
Ok, that makes sense. So is there an instanceof method in CF
or something similar to tell you what class was used to
create your object.
You can use GetMetaData() to find this out.
Also, can you create an interface with CFC's, and then
implement that interface with another class? (Like
test
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:239854
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http
. Holmes
http://phillipholmes.com
===
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 12:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Test object type
So I assume that you use session.currentUser to hold EITHER a manager
object
just testing subscription...
nothing to see here
-paul
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:238582
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription:
AArrrghhh!! No!! I looked. I wasted ALL that effort reading your
post and there was nothing there!
You owe me, Paul!
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com
ColdFusion, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET hosting from AUD$15/month
Grr... I wasted even more time reading YOUR reply! ;-)))
On 4/25/06, Mike Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AArrrghhh!! No!! I looked. I wasted ALL that effort reading your
post and there was nothing there!
You owe me, Paul!
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
Certified Advanced
Were not getting any mail thru our cfmail tag and want to test it. If I put the
following code on a page and call the url will it work, or what would you
recommend as a way to test the cfmail tag? Thanks
'cfmailtest.cfm'
cfmail from=#form.email#
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED
the mail logs that CF generates.
Also, make sure that your mail server allows smtp mail from the web
server.
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Steve Kahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 1:11 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Ways to test cfmail tag
Were not getting any mail thru
From: Steve Kahn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Were not getting any mail thru our cfmail tag and want to
test it. If I put the following code on a page and call the
url will it work, or what would you recommend as a way to
test the cfmail tag? Thanks
'cfmailtest.cfm'
cfmail from
This code as is won't work because it's expecting a form variable.
But yes, that's a great way to test. Just hard code a variable above the
cfmail tag with an email address:
cfset form.email = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cfmail from=#form.email#
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED
please ignore
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:234076
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe:
Ignore
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:234077
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe:
please ignore
Ignore what?
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:234081
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Claude Shenanigans just had to speak up...
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 2:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: test ingore
please ignore
Ignore what
test of a reply with a different subject.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:232492
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link
We're having trouble getting information from Adobe (since they
apparently know nothing about ColdFusion.)
We have a dual processor production server for which we will buy
whatever appropriate license.
Do we really need to buy a full additional license for our test server
(which is only
yes you can use the developer edition for commercial development (not to run
anything commercial in prod)...unless Adobe has changed the rules ;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell:
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: lincense on a test server?
yes you can use the developer edition for commercial development (not to
run
anything commercial in prod)...unless Adobe has changed the rules ;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc
Joelle Tegwen wrote:
We're having trouble getting information from Adobe (since they
apparently know nothing about ColdFusion.)
We have a dual processor production server for which we will buy
whatever appropriate license.
Do we really need to buy a full additional license for our test
Obviously, you'd be limited to the 1 IP address to access the Testing
server though. Not sure how you do testing, but it may not be the best
way to do it.
John Burns
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Wyle Laboratories, Inc. | Web Developer
I think the issue with this might be the limit on the # of ips that can
access it. There are only 2 ips allowed, and if you have a large team, this
can get problematic.
True enough Russ...so setup the server on another network and connect to it via
router where all connections through that
Well actually in CF7, it's restricted to localhost plus 2 other ips. But
it's easy enough to get around :-P
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 1:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: lincense on a test server?
Joelle Tegwen
developer edition is IP restricted to localhost. so unless you're
browser is running on the test server, that won't work.
umm..no it's 2 IPs...not localhost..last time I checked anyway
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone
: lincense on a test server?
I think the issue with this might be the limit on the # of ips that can
access it. There are only 2 ips allowed, and if you have a large team,
this
can get problematic.
True enough Russ...so setup the server on another network and connect to
it via
router where all
True enough Russ...so setup the server on another network and
connect to it via router where all connections through that
router are from a single IP ;-)
This would violate the license, of course.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the
We have a dual processor production server for which we will
buy whatever appropriate license.
Do we really need to buy a full additional license for our
test server (which is only accessible within our organization)?
Can we use the developer edition somehow?
If you only need to have
Or even better, use the built in server, and setup apache on
the same box to proxy the requests to the built in server...
That'll show em :-P
You may think I'm a prig for saying this, but I would strongly advise
everyone not to discuss how to violate licenses on the list. Bad things can
This would violate the license, of course.
how so Dave...it's just 1 IP and being used for development? Is there mention
of router and othr devices in the licensing?
TIA
Cheers
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone:
You may think I'm a prig for saying this, but I would strongly advise
everyone not to discuss how to violate licenses on the list. Bad things can
happen (and have) as a result.
not at all Dave...and my suggestion was only that...and you've since said it
would be a violation...now I just want
Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 16, 2006 1:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: lincense on a test server?
Or even better, use the built in server, and setup apache on
the same box to proxy the requests to the built in server...
That'll show em :-P
You may think I'm a prig
201 - 300 of 1366 matches
Mail list logo
