Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
This is my last response, I hope.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/03 05:16PM >>>
>they didn't tell anyone you had to have more than 16 colours on the
> In my study of the documentation that is written about
> Windows 2003 Enterprise, there is a new function, I
> believe originated with Windows XP.
>
> There is a wizard that will allow one to set a "compatibility
> mode" for any application that is installed. This means
> you can force compa
>Hehe I hear ya...but I didn't realize my short fuse until I yelled at my
>dog for the stupidest thing today...she just looked at me like, "ok
>buddy what's your problem??" hehe...poor lil' pooch. It's ok though, I
>went out and bought her some denti-bones. ;)
I support your efforts, Stacy, and ot
> Third, how does one convert the stand alone installation to
> a "normal" IIS installation? Am I stuck with ports 8500?
No, you can configure CFMX to use whatever web server you like, after
installing CFMX - you don't have to do it during the CFMX installation:
http://www.macromedia.com/support
I believe the connector scripts are intended to take care of that.
- Original Message -
From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's suppo
If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 5:59 AM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Ma
Dana Tierney wrote:
> well yeah, except that it appears that there is a problem with a specific
> KIND of installation, on shared servers.
There is no technical difference between a shared server and a dedicated
server. Only after you have installed CF you create the difference by
configuring i
Original Message-
From: Dave Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 12:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
me too Stacy, been 3 days and im starting to get testy & the headaches
are
killin!
- Or
gt; From: "Stacy Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 11:43 PM
> Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
>
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > This
me too Stacy, been 3 days and im starting to get testy & the headaches are
killin!
- Original Message -
From: "Stacy Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 11:43 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 10:43 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
| Hey folks,
|
| This is OT but I just wanted to apologize for the useless, opinionated
| crap I tossed in this thread earlier. I&
;
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 7:56 PM
> Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
>
>
> &
e Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 8:48 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
hey Doug, I wasn't saying u were taking pot shots at MM but there were
plenty of people doing it. You have been pretty reasonable.
mplete Bullsh*t.
> > >
> > > I understand people are frustrated but come on!
> > >
> > > I don't know about mike yet but it looks like the problem that Doug is
> > > having has to do with IIS stalling & last I had checked, even th
em that Doug is
> | > having has to do with IIS stalling & last I had checked, even though
there
> | > hasn't been a take over rumor this week, is that IIS = M$ and MM is
not M$,
> | > therefore not MM problem to deal with.
> | >
> | >
> | >
> | &g
lk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> Well, I tell you. The best support philosophy in my opinion is that of the
> isp I once worked at that said if some 82-year-old sunbird was c
oo but if you ever get stuck just know that I am here to try
> and help you even though im not a guru yet:)
>
> Dave
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday,
herefore not MM problem to deal with.
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
| >
| > - Original Message -
| > From: "mark brinkworth" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 3:07 AM
| > Sub
IIS stalling & last I had checked, even though there
> hasn't been a take over rumor this week, is that IIS = M$ and MM is not M$,
> therefore not MM problem to deal with.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "mark brinkworth&qu
Saturday, June 07, 2003 4:49 PM
> Subject: RE: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's
> support attention ...
>
>
> > So was it Windows 2003 that Mike was having problems with all this time?
> > Just curious since I had not seen that critica
TED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 4:49 PM
Subject: RE: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's
support attention ...
> So was it Windows 2003 that Mike was having problems with all this time?
> Just curious sinc
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 3:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with
Macromedia's support attention ...
Ken Wilson wrote:
> So all this time the OS that Mike's folks were having trouble installing
to
> was Windows 2003?
Mike was not the
good then you shouldn't be too far off!
whoohoo!
- Original Message -
From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with Macromedi
07, 2003 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's
support attention ...
| so is it up and going?
| :)
|
|
| - Original Message -
| From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Sent: Satu
tuck just know that I am here to try
and help you even though im not a guru yet:)
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied wi
Ken Wilson wrote:
> So all this time the OS that Mike's folks were having trouble installing to
> was Windows 2003?
Mike was not the only one having install problems, Doug has had his
share too.
Jochem
~|
Archives: http://www.
so is it up and going?
:)
- Original Message -
From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's
support atten
ECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 3:07 AM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> Somebody within Macromedia should 'own' the problem,
> and ensure
>
> a) that it is being dealt w
So all this time the OS that Mike's folks were having trouble installing to
was Windows 2003?
Ken
-Original Message-
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 12:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: remote installation - WAS Very unsatisfied with
Macrome
woo hoo!
Doug White writes:
> See what happens when an expert makes himself available?
>
> Message just received from Jochem:
>
> Installer runs just fine and CF MX too. Also no problems with the
> updater. But when shutting down IIS in order to apply the connectors,
> FTP service hung. I ran
See what happens when an expert makes himself available?
Message just received from Jochem:
Installer runs just fine and CF MX too. Also no problems with the
updater. But when shutting down IIS in order to apply the connectors,
FTP service hung. I ran the connectors anyway. You might need to do s
In my study of the documentation that is written about Windows 2003 Enterprise,
there is a new function, I believe originated with Windows XP.
There is a wizard that will allow one to set a "compatibility mode" for any
application that is installed. This means you can force compatibility with
Win
think
> they maybe doing the same...it happens.....all the time:)
>
> so Dana, what do u like best so far about working with coldfusion?
>
>
> dave
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dana Tierney
agreed
mark brinkworth writes:
> Somebody within Macromedia should 'own' the problem,
> and ensure
>
> a) that it is being dealt with within Macromedia
> b) that the client is regularly informed as to the
> status of their problem.
>
> That person need not be a developer.
>
> Cheers
>
> ---
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 4:24 AM
> Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
>
>
> | Doug White wrote:
> | >
> | > I am not proud. I will give so
ne 07, 2003 4:24 AM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
| Doug White wrote:
| >
| > I am not proud. I will give someone remote access to my box with full admin
| > privileges and let them try to install the updater.
|
| If you run 16 colors, it is
Jerry,
You're being a dick. Shut up.
Greg Luce
954-418-9321
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
This is my last respon
Doug White wrote:
>
> I am not proud. I will give someone remote access to my box with full admin
> privileges and let them try to install the updater.
If you run 16 colors, it is not going to work. If you run 256 colors,
you can set up pcAnywhere to allow connections from 145.94.154.26
You mig
Somebody within Macromedia should 'own' the problem,
and ensure
a) that it is being dealt with within Macromedia
b) that the client is regularly informed as to the
status of their problem.
That person need not be a developer.
Cheers
--- Angel Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I
completely u
- Original Message -
From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> Dave
> The reason hosting providers do no
t so far about working with coldfusion?
dave
- Original Message -----
From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 1:27 AM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support atte
rom: "Dave Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 12:17 AM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
| im sorry, I missed the part where u r being such a big help to everyone.
| so
eing me as trying to help but I am.
> just the same as u may be trying to help but I don't see it.
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturd
rom: "Dana Tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2003 12:59 AM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> yanno maybe I should rescind my vote about this thread staying on talk. Or
&
Its hard in his case because he cant get into the server & find out what's
> going on. personally, I hope you both find your solutions:)
>
> dave
>
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk&quo
en do that but right now hosting costs me $0, so I think I'm
good to go:)
- Original Message -
From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia&
- Original Message -
From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:38 PM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> Ha! my problem was somewhat different. when in
--
> From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:37 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: The End: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention
> ...
>
> Stacey Young wrote:
>
>
> <<< As anyone knows the installation
like I just said to Stacy... since you are so gifted why not set it up
remotely for him? He's said he isn't proud. If you aren't part of the
solution, get out of the way. Sorry to inflame the thread further but I
think some of the posts are becomng a bit unreasonable.
Dana
Ken Wilson writes:
> >
language for this to
make sense to you please let me know, I'll babelfish it. =P
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: The End: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention
...
Stacey Youn
>even if many of the "flock" know not whereof they speak.
Amusing comment coming from someone who apparently can't get it running
directed at those who have done so repeatedly. :)
Good luck to you.
Ken
~|
Archives: http://www
/isp.cfm?isp_id=772
==
If you are not satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfie
e, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: "Charlie Arehart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 10:04 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
| Wow, hopefull
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:08 PM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> | > I got $20 that says that this issue has to do with how the host has
his
> | > system
fwiw I am reading the thread. Since it deals with install issues I see no
reason to either drop the issue or move it to community.
my .02
Dana
Doug White writes:
> |
> | << | heck isn't technical in nature any more...>>>
> |
> |
> | I'm sure there are lots of people here who are most interest
t", right? Just want to clarify.
/charlie
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 11:06 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
>
>
> Hey Charlie
> I
|
|
| This is my last communication on any aspect of this entire thread. At
| least until I can say "... and here's how we fixed it." I'm sure lots of
| people will be most pleased at this announcement.
|
|
| Cheers,
| Michael Kear
| Windsor, NSW, Australia
| AFP Webworks.
|
|
Michae
|
| Hope things work out,
|
| Stace
|
At least the quoted part of your post makes sense!
Doug
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.c
| > I got $20 that says that this issue has to do with how the host has his
| > system set up & that somewhere in the docs it says that acknowledges it and
| > advises against it & u (jochem) will be the one to point it out as always:)
You lose, you want Michael's PayPal address? :-)
~~~
TED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 6:30 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
| The inability of CFMX to run at startup is not new nor unique to Mike. My
| machine has suffered the problem for many months. It
|
| <<>>
|
|
| I'm sure there are lots of people here who are most interested in the
| outcome. They've spent most of the night telling me how to organise my life
| and my business without knowing a damn thing about me.
|
|
|
|
|
| <<>>
|
| So do i.
|
Hang in there Michael, even if many of the "f
isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:08 PM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
| Dave Lyons wrote:
| &g
Stacey Young wrote:
<<< As anyone knows the installation problems relating to CFMX have been
festering for weeks and Macromedia were asked to help ages ago. Progress
was happening at a snails pace. What else should I have done if I
couldn't get anyone to answer my emails or give me status report
Mike,
> WHAT'S BEEN DONE:
> The sysadmin has replaced the card with a 256col card, and tried again to
> reinstall updater3. Now it seems to install, but CF won't start
> automatically. Every time the server gets booted, ColdFusion has to be
> manually started. (I don't consider this to be satis
between ;)
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 8:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
-Original Message-
From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Very
-Original Message-
From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
<>>
That's not what I am doing now or any time. As I've said at least a dozen
times now, I was getting no answers from Mac
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 7:37 PM
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> Dave Lyons wrote:
> > hard to disagree with what you say jochem cause ur always right.
>
> Thank you for the compliment. But you know, in i
essage -
From: "Stacy Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:38 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> Yes there have been some issues with CFMX but I could do w
AIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 7 June 2003 9:35 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
Yet another week? Wasn't it just this week that you started working with
Macromedia on the first problem? Which they seemed to figure out for you
pretty
in nature any more...
Hope things work out,
Stace
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 7:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
Jerry Johnson wrote:
>>>>[EMA
Dave Lyons wrote:
> hard to disagree with what you say jochem cause ur always right.
Thank you for the compliment. But you know, in investment this would be
the time to start doing the opposite from what I am saying, because you
should never go with the herd :-)
> But it brings up two points (
L PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:45 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
>
>
> Thanks for your interest and reply Christian. As it happens I've suddenly
> had a flurry of emails from Macromedia, incl
opefully spread the word so others don't suffer
it.
/charlie
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 7:13 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
>
>
MAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 2:18 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> Mike,
>
> Just so you know, you sound _incredible_ whinny and bitchy.
~~
s crashing I can
guarantee you it's something in the code.
-Novak
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Kear" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support
ial interest in "his" bug.
(Sometimes with serious issues we could have quite a few users 'owning' the
bug) and it would buy us time.
Cheers,
Michael Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Jerry Johnson wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/03 05:16PM >>>
>>
>>they didn't tell anyone you had to have more than 16 colours on the graphic card to
>>install
>>UD3 and now it is broken.
>
>
> If you were writing software, would it even occur to you to test on a 16 color
> graphics card?
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:38 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> Great, Thanks Mike. That means any time the server goes down, there's
> another 5 minutes of downtime
od ones anyway) are pretty gifted at delivering
the news and dealing with upset customers.
-Novak
- Original Message -
From: "Angel Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 12:23 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied wi
chem?
the offer is still open and the new house has a nice indoor pool/hot tub
(not to mention the umm "scenery")
dave
- Original Message -
From: "Jochem van Dieten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday,
Doug White wrote:
>
> If a software author can add that error trap into his installer package for
> software selling for less that $100.00 US, then why cannot MM do exactly the
> same with the InstallShield package for CFMX which sells for many thousands of
> US dollars??
CF MX U3 uses InstallAny
Good suggestion Jochem. I know you weren't directing that comment at me,
but I don't get involved in betas for anything because All my machines are
used for live work. I have production servers in the USA and I have dev
servers here in my office in Australia that are being used for live
developme
Here is another silly response from someone with no software packaging
experience.
When one purchases server hardware, high end graphic cards are not as high a
priority as the CPU, motherboard, bus speed, hard drive space, etc.
Second, when one installs such a machine, and does a wipe and then, f
Dave Lyons wrote:
>
> I understand its not your fault either but just seeing how the server only
> had an ancient video card would lead me to believe that the host is
> seriously cutting corners and if I was you I'd be very concerned about that.
Not installing any video drivers except for the def
Ezine wrote:
>
> Macromedia is doing beta testing now of the next updater.. Code named Red
> Sky. I'm looking forward to see if it will fix my issue.
Why not join the beta? Then you can make sure it is fixed.
Jochem
~|
Archiv
Isn't it time for this to end? It seems that, through the breath-holding,
foot-stamping and pigtail-pulling from the peanut gallery that there is ample evidence
of screwups on both sides.
So -- and please take this in the lighthearted spirit its given in -- everybody chill
out and shut the h
gt; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, 7 June 2003 7:47 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support
> attention ...
>
> Actually, many installers these days require >= 2
> If I could change the order and make cfmx last it might clear up my
> problem.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:19 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with
lk
Subject: Re: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
Actually, many installers these days require >= 256 color mode. Dunno why.
Anyhoo, who runs in 16 color mode these days? :)
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Frid
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 7 June 2003 7:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
Boy, you've got my goat now (and the poor thing should be off for the
weekend)
>>>
Actually, many installers these days require >= 256 color mode. Dunno why.
Anyhoo, who runs in 16 color mode these days? :)
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, June 6, 2003 3:40 pm
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's sup
This is my last response, I hope.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/03 05:16PM >>>
>they didn't tell anyone you had to have more than 16 colours on the graphic card to
>install
>UD3 and now it is broken.
If you were writing software, would it even occur to you to test on a 16 color
graphics card? Wh
age-
From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 5:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
::nod:: as a former tech support person, I have been in this position also,
and although I see the need I hated doing
Boy, you've got my goat now (and the poor thing should be off for the weekend)
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/03 04:53PM >>>
>Thanks for the business advice Ken. Trust me there are issues to be
>resolved with the hosting company.
Why do you get so snooty when people respond to your issues with sugg
::nod:: as a former tech support person, I have been in this position also,
and although I see the need I hated doing this as it usually resulted into
an inquiry into just *why* the problem wasn't solved yet. I could see the
utility of an app that automatically generated emails a lot of places
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
|
| Does that, perchance, equate to being a cheap hosting company? And, if so,
| are you now getting exactly wh
Mike,
Just so you know, you sound _incredible_ whinny and bitchy.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/06/03 02:44PM >>>
So in short, No, I haven't rebooted and seen what happens. I don't have
permissions to reboot.
To paraphrase:
"No, I haven't tried any of the steps Macromedia has suggested.
I am just
east half a dozen MM people working on the problem.
Cheers,
Michael Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks.
-Original Message-
From: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 7 June 2003 7:01 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's suppo
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> I know I'm stirring up a lot of fuss, and I guess I'm making no friends at
> Macromedia.
F-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2003 4:43 PM
Subject: RE: Very unsatisfied with Macromedia's support attention ...
> >I had to find a hosting company with a business deal
> >that worked with my business
>
>
> Does that, perchance, equate to
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
