Use this often for ajax debugging in CF, abruptly stopped working (for me) with
FF4,
http://www.netgrow.com.au/files/javascript_dump.cfm
TIA, -m
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfus
Can this be becuase of change in cfdump output structure from CF8 to CF9? And
the application depending on the same?
~|
Order the Adobe Coldfusion Anthology now!
http://www.amazon.com/Adobe-Coldfusion-Anthology-Michael
I'm not seeing any issue with it:
This works fine for me,
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Stephen Cassady
wrote:
>
> This was new, just migrated some applications from an 8 to a 9 server. Part
> of our code started to fail. We have a process that uses CF
This was new, just migrated some applications from an 8 to a 9 server. Part of
our code started to fail. We have a process that uses CFDUMP and mails us the
result as we run a process. The process sits inside of a CFTHREAD.
This works in 8, it fails in 9. Remove the CFTHREAD, the code works
I have just applied the Jan 2009 patch (7703210)to Oracle 9.2.0.8 Once the
patching was completed, and the server rebooted, everything works fine, execpt
for cfdump and cftrace, both tags now take two to three minutes just to dump a
simple 90 record query. The query itself take only 350ms
I know this isn't exactly what you want, but don't forget you can dump
one row, the top row, if you use top=1 in your cfdump tag. It will
limit the dump of the query to 1 row. Useful for seeing a part of the
query in your dump.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Andy Matthews wrote:
>
Here's code on CFLib which converts a query row into a struct. You could
then dump the struct:
http://cflib.org/udf/QueryRowToStruct
andy
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:dwa...@figleaf.com]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 10:11 PM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: How to cfd
> I'm using cfloop to go through a query result set. Some
> of the data is giving me trouble...is there a way to use
> cfdump to dump out the contents of the current row in the
> recordset?
No, I don't think so. There's no object that corresponds to a row,
within a qu
try myQuery[myQuery.CurrentRow]
2009/1/6 Pete Ruckelshaus
> I'm using cfloop to go through a query result set. Some of the data
> is giving me trouble...is there a way to use cfdump to dump out the
> contents of the current row in the recordset?
>
I'm using cfloop to go through a query result set. Some of the data
is giving me trouble...is there a way to use cfdump to dump out the
contents of the current row in the recordset?
Thanks
Pete
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 sof
Thanks Dominic!
-Original Message-
From: Dominic Watson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 1:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfdump xml doc hanging server
>
>
Firstly, that second xmlParse appears to be redundant. You are just
parsing an already parsed x
g like this instead (getting a small
portion of the xml and dumping it):
It may still take a while but hopefully it will give you a result
because the cfdump isn't having to dump out such a huge load (view the
source of a page with a cfdump to appreciate the extra volume of data
being
I'm trying to dump a xml file but it's killing the server... ideas?
http://www.wng.com/test/test.xml"; method="GET">
If I put a cfabort above the dump the page doesn't hang.
~~~
This is all covered in the documentation by the way.
http://livedocs.adobe.com/coldfusion/8/htmldocs/help.html
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Chad Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently upgraded to CF8 and I noticed when I dump a Query there is
> something called SQLPARAMETERS and it disp
> I recently upgraded to CF8 and I noticed when I dump a Query
> there is something called SQLPARAMETERS and it display an Array.
>
> What is this?
If I recall correctly, it's your bound parameters, which are created when
you use the CFQUERYPARAM tag.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://w
I recently upgraded to CF8 and I noticed when I dump a Query there is something
called SQLPARAMETERS and it display an Array.
What is this?
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
dat
Thanks. :)
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW, do you know how to check the header information to find
> > out what version reader the user is running?
>
> The variable in question is Acrobat-Version, if I recall correctly. So, in
> CF, you can access
> BTW, do you know how to check the header information to find
> out what version reader the user is running?
The variable in question is Acrobat-Version, if I recall correctly. So, in
CF, you can access it via GetHttpRequestData().headers. I would've expected
it to be in the CGI scope as well, b
Yeah.. It's really wierd. I think that since I'm using reader 8.0 and
everyone else is using the latest (8.1.2?) to load up the form, that
may be it. I'm putting on a newer version and hopefully, that will
clear it up.
BTW, do you know how to check the header information to find out what
version
> I'm running ColdFusion 8 along with Live designer from Adobe
> (the one that turns PDFs into forms). On every computer tried
> on the network, I get a result I would expect. 20 fields with
> the selection choices made on the test shown.
>
> When run from MY computer, I get the following..
>
I'm running ColdFusion 8 along with Live designer from Adobe (the one
that turns PDFs into forms). On every computer tried on the network, I
get a result I would expect. 20 fields with the selection choices made
on the test shown.
When run from MY computer, I get the following..
FIELDNAMES
Mikes' local machine is CF7 and the host is CF8.
On 10/25/07, Brian Kotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can dump the bean factory itself just fine (or at least I can). It's
> when you try to call getClass() on it that it won't work. Something inside
> CFDUMP is tr
You can dump the bean factory itself just fine (or at least I can). It's
when you try to call getClass() on it that it won't work. Something inside
CFDUMP is trying to call getClass() on the bean factory. Why, I have no
idea, but it is, and that's why it's blowing up. If Mike
On Thursday 25 Oct 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
I cfdump'ed our application.beanfactory just yesterday, on CF7 on our own
servers.
It's 'normally' fine.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to heterogeneously maximize bricks-and-clicks data
on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
***
Well it beats me. I can run a page with
and that displays just fine. But change that line to
and the getClass() error we've been talking about pops up.
Which things can you CFDUMP and which things can't?
What a learning exercise I started this whole thing because i ha
EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > This issue has now morphed into another issue. I was getting an
> > > error which I thought was coldspring-caused but which actually turned
> > > out to be caused by the CFDUMP tag i was using to check the result.
&g
When I hosted with HMS my server had no sandboxing at all and JSP was
enabled. However I agree that in this case they are probably looking
at the wrong setting (since cfdump is failing).
On 10/25/07, Brian Kotek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike, this sounds highly suspect. There is simp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This issue has now morphed into another issue. I was getting an
> > error which I thought was coldspring-caused but which actually turned
> > out to be caused by the CFDUMP tag i was using to check the result.
> >
> > So i se
27;t understand
what you're asking them, or they're lying to you.
On 10/24/07, Mike Kear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This issue has now morphed into another issue. I was getting an
> error which I thought was coldspring-caused but which actually turned
> out to be c
thought was coldspring-caused but which actually turned
> out to be caused by the CFDUMP tag i was using to check the result.
>
> So i set about wanting to get hostmysite to change and allow access to
> internal java components in the CF8 only to find that setting is
> currently U
This issue has now morphed into another issue. I was getting an
error which I thought was coldspring-caused but which actually turned
out to be caused by the CFDUMP tag i was using to check the result.
So i set about wanting to get hostmysite to change and allow access to
internal java
I was goign to try this. I stopped the server and went to delete the file in
cfclasses but there are still no more files generated in there.
I must be looking in the wornmg place?
On 8/20/07, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Have you tried taking the CF server down, deleting those file
Have you tried taking the CF server down, deleting those files while
it is down, than starting it up again? This can make a difference.
On 8/20/07, Giles Roadnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what do I do when deleting everything in there doesn't work?
>
> Thanks for the suggestions so far.
>
So what do I do when deleting everything in there doesn't work?
Thanks for the suggestions so far.
On 8/17/07, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm on unix, an environment that I'm not very used to. If I delete all
> the
> > files in WEBINF/cfclasses will that do the trick or do I
> I'm on unix, an environment that I'm not very used to. If I delete all the
> files in WEBINF/cfclasses will that do the trick or do I have to delete
> other files too?
Nope, that's it.
One of the nice things about CF is that it's a J2EE app, so all the bits are in
the same place on all platfo
Thanks for the reply.
I'm on unix, an environment that I'm not very used to. If I delete all the
files in WEB-INF/cfclasses will that do the trick or do I have to delete
other files too?
Thanks again.
Giles
On 8/17/07, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 17 Aug 2007, [EMAIL P
On Friday 17 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How do I go about fixing this? It's causing me real headaches!
Reboot CF.
Clear out the cache'd CF files.
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to elementarily create internet users
on: http://thefalken.livejournal.com
***
Hi All
I'm trying to debug a problem I'm having with some WSDL webservices. I'm
trying to call these services using CFinvoke in another CF page then dumping
the retunred result.
I keep getting an odd error so I creted this very simple page:
http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";>
Dump Test
http://www.cflib.org/udf.cfm?ID=548
That what you want?
Mark
On 10/12/06, Dan Plesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well for Java objects you can create simple text out output. I posted an
> example already just look around for it.
>
>
>
~~
Well for Java objects you can create simple text out output. I posted an
example already just look around for it.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information b
e Tangorre
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wed Oct 11 17:55:52 2006
Subject: Re: Simple CFDump
From: "Snake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CFDUMP is just a CFML tag, so you could just rip the code out and modify
> it.
The dump.cfm ct on my bo
From: "Snake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CFDUMP is just a CFML tag, so you could just rip the code out and modify
> it.
The dump.cfm ct on my box is encrypted... last I checked.
~|
Introducing the Fusi
CFDUMP is just a CFML tag, so you could just rip the code out and modify it.
Snake
-Original Message-
From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 October 2006 17:15
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Simple CFDump
Has anybody created a simplified CFDump extension? I love using
, but there
Has anybody created a simplified CFDump extension? I love using ,
but there are many times I would like a simplified, DHTML-less version for use
in emails, databases records, or simple file output where I could live without
the extensive JS portion of the cfdump output. Does anything like
I should add that there is NOTHING in the code that would force a page refresh!!
I've just confrimed this by removing the CFDUMPs and replaced with good old
CFOUTPUT and all works as intended!!
Anybody?
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group
Hey All,
Is there an issue with CFDUMP on MX 7?
We're running some data intensive scripts with cfdumps along the way to ensure
all is going smoothly. It seems that using cfdump instead of cfoutput to dump
vars, the page will display partially (almost like CFFLUSH allows for) and then
All--- This is a bug confirmed by Macromedia, but not resolved, as follows. I
have to hack around this until (IF) they fix it. I'll update CFBugHunt too.
Thanks.--- Rob
>>> Bill Sahlas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/9/2005 11:05:18 AM >>>
I was able to reproduce the problem using the tests that you p
Nope.
Commented out the logic in the app.cfm for just that reason and just left in
so it wouldn't blow up.
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 4:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfcatch/cfdump weirdness
I see the b
I see the bottom content for all three cases. CFMX 6.1 on JRun on
RedHat 8.0. You got an Application.cfm somewhere that's screwing
things up?
cheers,
barneyb
On 9/8/05, Timothy Heald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Afternoon folks!
>
> We have run into some really strange
Afternoon folks!
We have run into some really strange problems with cfdump-ing a cfcatch
structure. It is almost as though at the end of is
.
We are running this and getting the same results on 2 different servers. Both
are on CFMX 6.1, one is windows 2000, one is 2003. Here are three
I've completed my JavaScript "dump" extension and posted it here (long URL):
http://www.depressedpress.com/depressedpress/Content/Development/JavaScript/
Extensions/DP_DeBug/Index.cfm
The library adds two methods to the Object prototype (making them available
to all objects): dpDump() which prese
haels wrote:
>Nope.
>If you go through the source and remove all the whitespace then sometimes it
>does.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: 22 August 2005 15:16
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: CFDUMP for PHP
>
>view source an
Nope.
If you go through the source and remove all the whitespace then sometimes it
does.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Ferguson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 22 August 2005 15:16
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDUMP for PHP
view source and paste it into an IDE and the line #s should match
l Message-
>From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: vrijdag 19 augustus 2005 13:26
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: CFDUMP for PHP
>
> >>I've been working on something similar for JavaScript.
>
>Just a bit OT in this OT subject, one thing I
>>Might be, but I've never been able to get it working
Actually, this was with W98, I never could manage to install it.
I just gave it another try now that I have XP.
It installed correctly, I created a bug somewhere, ran the page, got the
message
"Do you want to start the debugger?", said YES,
>>Doesn't the Ms javascript debugger tell you the actual line in the src ?
Might be, but I've never been able to get it working :-(
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this
-
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 19 augustus 2005 13:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDUMP for PHP
>>I've been working on something similar for JavaScript.
Doesn't the Ms javascript debugger tell you the actual line in the src ?
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 August 2005 13:26
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CFDUMP for PHP
>>I've been working on something similar for JavaScript.
>>I've been working on something similar for JavaScript.
Just a bit OT in this OT subject, one thing I've always been dreaming of
would be some
way to find the EXACT line in which Javascript file where an error occurs.
MSIE is really idiot in that matter, just giving the line number. In a
CF fi
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 11:56 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: CFDUMP for PHP
>
> Well done... thats extremely handy!
>
Very cool.
I've been working on something similar for Java
Well done... thats extremely handy!
Cheers,
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Hewitt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 4:25 PM
Subject: CFDUMP for PHP
> This may be a little OT but for those of you who also code
This may be a little OT but for those of you who also code in php and
always wanted a cfdump there is something now available. Check out:
http://dbug.ospinto.com/.
- Andrew Hewitt
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your
, June 29, 2005 12:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: another cfdump bug?
is this on 7?
works fine for me on 6.1+updater+hotfix hf56580_611.zip
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 June 2005 17:18
To: CF-Talk
Subject: another cfdump bug?
I'm running into an issue
is this on 7?
works fine for me on 6.1+updater+hotfix hf56580_611.zip
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 June 2005 17:18
To: CF-Talk
Subject: another cfdump bug?
I'm running into an issue with cfdump. Here is the sample code that
reproduces the issu
I'm running into an issue with cfdump. Here is the sample code that
reproduces the issue I'm having.
#testStruc
Yeah, I though to test it about 25ms after I hit the "send" button. Doh!
-Original Message-
From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 June 2005 1:02
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [QUARRANTINE]CFDUMP and value formatting
Heh. Apparently, I'm smarter tha
AIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, 14 June 2005 11:50
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: [QUARRANTINE]CFDUMP and value formatting
>
> My understanding was that they were Java datetime objects in CF6 and
> above, but I could be totally wrong. James Holmes states that they are
> simply spec
I agree.
>Either way, CF should not be reformatting any of your form strings
without you explicitly calling a function.
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and d
See my correction of myself :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ben Doom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 June 2005 11:50
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [QUARRANTINE]CFDUMP and value formatting
My understanding was that they were Java datetime objects in CF6 and
above, but I could be
My understanding was that they were Java datetime objects in CF6 and
above, but I could be totally wrong. James Holmes states that they are
simply specially formatted strings, but I thought that was just the
default output.
Either way, CF should not be reformatting any of your form strings
withou
-Talk
Subject: RE: [QUARRANTINE]CFDUMP and value formatting
In fact these datetime "objects" are just a different type of string:
{ts '2005-06-14 23:30:11'}
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help
In fact these datetime "objects" are just a different type of string:
{ts '2005-06-14 23:30:11'}
-Original Message-
From: Dawson, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 June 2005 11:32
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: [QUARRANTINE]CFDUMP and value formatti
>11/14/1979 is a string. Now() and createdate() and parsedatetime()
etc.
create datetime objects.
When you say that these create datetime objects, do they only create
correct-formatted date/time strings or is there an actual object
underneath?
If there is an object can't you do something like:
> Everything from FORM and GET come in as a string.
>
> So, what you see if you dump the FORM scope should be the literal text
> that is actually submitted.
>
> --Ben
Greatso I did misunderstand your initial reply ;-)
Thanks for the claritythought it being formatted from the FORM would be
11/14/1979 is a string. Now() and createdate() and parsedatetime() etc.
create datetime objects.
Everything from FORM and GET come in as a string.
So, what you see if you dump the FORM scope should be the literal text
that is actually submitted.
--Ben
Bryan Stevenson wrote:
>
> Are you saying
> IIRC, it will format something that is a datetime object, but a string
> will come through unformatted.
>
> --Ben
Just re-read your reply Ben and wanted to clarify
Are you saying a field in the FORM scope that contains a string that appears
to be a date would get formatted? or does CF have
> IIRC, it will format something that is a datetime object, but a string
> will come through unformatted.
>
> --Ben
Really!!?? That is truly stupid IMHO if that really is the case
How the heck can you figure out what may be wrong if your value gets
formatted??? you wouldn't know what the real v
IIRC, it will format something that is a datetime object, but a string
will come through unformatted.
--Ben
Bryan Stevenson wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> I'm just wondering if CF formats the data dumped via CFDUMP??
>
> For exampleif I dump the FORM scope which contains a field
Hey All,
I'm just wondering if CF formats the data dumped via CFDUMP??
For exampleif I dump the FORM scope which contains a field with a date as a
value...will CF attempt to format it as a date when it dumps it? or leave the
raw value unchanged?
I would assume it stays raw and unch
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:17:09 -0300, Terracini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And the doubled outputed data was driving me crazy, since I was trying
> to find a non-existant bug in the UDF.
>
> Anyway, I think this is a CF7 bug, since it double the data outputed by
> a function
by
a function when called by cfdump tag.
--
Fabio Terracini
Sean Corfield wrote:
>On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:28:53 -0300, Terracini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>a
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>Outputting something and also returning a val
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:28:53 -0300, Terracini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> a
>
>
Outputting something and also returning a value is not really a good
idea. Either a method should return a result or it should output
something (and return nothing).
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corf
Hello,
I wrote a small UDF to help confirm this:
a
#test()#
The expected result is:
a foo
a foo
But the result I'm getting (tested in two CF 7 deploys, Windows based) is
a foo
a a foo
The cfdump seems to evaluate the function twice before return the
result. I hope no on
Hello,
I wrote a small UDF to help confirm this:
a
#test()#
The expected result is:
a foo
a foo
But the result I'm getting (tested in two CF 7 deploys, Windows based) is
a foo
a a foo
The cfdump seems to evaluate the function twice before return the
result. I hope no on
oh
it changed names :)
www.nerdfootball.com
and yes, it was an AWESOME season,
the site CHANGED sooo much, the code you helped
with is WAYYY in use, and was one of the coolest features.
thanks for asking.
tw
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:39:32 -0800, Dick Applebaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> C
C;mon.. I'm in enough trouble.
F___Nerd Football!
Dick
On Feb 8, 2005, at 8:33 PM, Tony Weeg wrote:
> FN FB?
>
> tw
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and do
FN FB?
tw
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 19:47:36 -0800, Dick Applebaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Tony... you win FN FB?
>
> I picked the Steelers, so I would have been long gone!
>
> Dick
>
>
> On Feb 8, 2005, at 7:21 PM, Tony Weeg wrote:
>
> > i realize it has no warranties, etc...
> > but my
Hey Tony... you win FN FB?
I picked the Steelers, so I would have been long gone!
Dick
On Feb 8, 2005, at 7:21 PM, Tony Weeg wrote:
> i realize it has no warranties, etc...
> but my dump file is all crazy code crap.
>
> and when i run this, thats all i get...
>
> that back?
>
> any ideas
>
ustration with CFMX's dump tag not
> generating standards compliant CSS, I wrote a custom wrapper for the
> tag. In the /WEB-INF/cftags directory, move 'dump.cfm' to
> 'mmdump.cfm', create a new file named 'dump.cfm', and paste this code
> in (watch
ode
in (watch the line wrap). Once installed, continue to use CFDUMP
exactly as before, and watch it magically work again. It works by
simply running a pair of REreplace calls on the output of CFDUMP to
insert hashes before hex colors and adding 'px' as a unit behind
numbers without a unit
gt; -Original Message-
> From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 1:10 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: CFDUMP var=variables shows custom functions?
>
> I have an error tracker on my code that emails me a dump of just about
> every
:05
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfdump not formatting correctly
On 09 Dec 2004 09:55:36 -0500, Calvin Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the problem is that none of the color settings have a # before
the color hexadecimal representation.
>
> If you really wanted to retain your doctyp
t and ignore all other
variables-scoped variables.
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Damien McKenna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 1:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFDUMP var=variables shows custom functions?
I have an error tracker on my code that emails me a dump of
Check out this blog entry from Ray Camden on a way to maybe remedy
this situation:
http://www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog/index.cfm?mode=search
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 09:02:11 -0400, Brant Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone else have any issues with the tag not formating right? I
I have an error tracker on my code that emails me a dump of just about
everything. Today, on one site, I started including all of the
CFLib.org files for all page requests rather than as needed. Nice idea,
except that now my email error dumps are twenty times larger than
before, all because the U
request.cfdumpinited
> CFDUMP uses a large style sheet to format it's output. It
> is "smart"
> in that it uses a request variable so it only outputs the
> style once.
> However, if you use cfdump in a request and the output is
> swollowed,
> like sent to an e
On 09 Dec 2004 09:55:36 -0500, Calvin Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the problem is that none of the color settings have a # before the
> color hexadecimal representation.
>
> If you really wanted to retain your doctype, you can create a custom tag
> wrapper fo
CFDUMP uses a large style sheet to format it's output. It is "smart"
in that it uses a request variable so it only outputs the style once.
However, if you use cfdump in a request and the output is swollowed,
like sent to an email, then the second cfdump in your request will be
mi
I believe the problem is that none of the color settings have a # before the
color hexadecimal representation.
If you really wanted to retain your doctype, you can create a custom tag
wrapper for cfdump and parse in the # sounds where appropriate
- Calvin
-Original Message-
From
IIRC, removing the doctype from the document will resolve the issue
with the formatting of the dump.
On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 09:02:11 -0400, Brant Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone else have any issues with the tag not formating right? I
> have found that sometimes my will lose all i
1 - 100 of 214 matches
Mail list logo
