Re: clientVar storage/multiple CFAS/single storage db

2000-12-19 Thread paul smith
Xing: Since I was storing client variables in a database anyway, for this but mainly other reasons I went to a scheme where I create CFI/CFT pairs (analogous to CFID/CFTOKEN pairs) using my own algorithm. Since CFI is incremented by 1 in a single table for each new user no matter how many ma

Re: clientVar storage/multiple CFAS/single storage db

2000-12-19 Thread Xing Li
eneric statements they use and I don't see a reason why they shouldn't make them customizable. - Original Message - From: "paul smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000

Re: clientVar storage/multiple CFAS/single storage db

2000-11-20 Thread paul smith
Bud: I assume you mean URL string not query string, and the answer is Yes. I'm not using cookies and am instead passing CFID/CFTOKEN in the URL as follows: http://www.MyApp.com/index.cfm/CD.38230/CN.80270945 Modified Fusebox-style-wise, app_globals.cfm uses CD.38230 to assign 38230 to url.cf

Re: clientVar storage/multiple CFAS/single storage db

2000-11-19 Thread paul smith
The problem (if there is one) is that the next (or last, I don't know which) value of CFID is kept in the Registry. Two machines that don't talk to one another means both machines *could* come up with the same CFID. Even if possible, it must be very unlikely (ordinarily). OTOH, if you start

Re: clientVar storage/multiple CFAS/single storage db

2000-11-19 Thread paul smith
At 05:17 AM 11/19/00 -0500, you wrote: >On 11/18/00, pan penned: > >If clientP is using App_1 on ServerA and > > clientQ is using App_1 on ServerB, > >how likely is it, if at all, that the entries > >in CDATA/CGLOBAL are conflated? > >I believe that you won't end up with the same cfid/cftoken

Re: clientVar storage/multiple CFAS/single storage db

2000-11-19 Thread Bud
On 11/18/00, pan penned: >If clientP is using App_1 on ServerA and > clientQ is using App_1 on ServerB, >how likely is it, if at all, that the entries >in CDATA/CGLOBAL are conflated? I believe that you won't end up with the same cfid/cftoken pair under the same application name. If the user

Re: clientVar storage/multiple CFAS/single storage db

2000-11-18 Thread paul smith
Looks like they're assigning CFIDs independently. I believe CFAS keeps track of the last CFID in the registry. best, paul At 01:19 PM 11/18/00 -0800, you wrote: >In a non-clustered network of machines, each machine >having CFAS running, that uses a single dsn for client var >storage - are CFID

clientVar storage/multiple CFAS/single storage db

2000-11-18 Thread pan
In a non-clustered network of machines, each machine having CFAS running, that uses a single dsn for client var storage - are CFIDs uniquely assigned for the storage db, or is each CFAS assigning CFIDs independently of each other? In both CDATA and CGLOBAL the field cfid actually stores the cfid-