It should be possible to find the 4.5 era cf_dump custom tag (the
predecessor to cfdump). There might even be multiple implementations out
there. Should work fine for arrays, structures and simple vars.
/H.
--
Hugo Ahlenius
-
Hugo Ahle
actually cfdump is just a regular custom tag, altho it is encrypted.
But you could effectively replace it.
Russ
On 10/28/05, Ryan Guill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hey ray, somewhat on and off topic,
>
> do you know if it is possible to modify the cfdump structure?
> particularly the stylesheet
Others have already answered, but another idea is to just write your
own cfdump. It wouldn't be too hard. :) Another idea - write a custom
tag that calls cfdump and all your tag does is a regex on the result
of cfdump - ie - a wrapper. Just some random ideas.:)
On 10/28/05, Ryan Guill <[EMAIL PROT
Why not just do that dynamically.
--
Snake
-Original Message-
From: Charlie Griefer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 October 2005 23:57
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: debugging complaint
i've seen where doctypes will remove all colors from a cfdump (border colors
and background c
Thanks charlie, thats good to know.
On 10/28/05, Charlie Griefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i've seen where doctypes will remove all colors from a cfdump (border
> colors and background colors), rendering it highly ineffective.
>
> removing the doctype declaration normally fixes this for me. (o
i've seen where doctypes will remove all colors from a cfdump (border
colors and background colors), rendering it highly ineffective.
removing the doctype declaration normally fixes this for me. (of
course, it goes back in prior to going to production) :)
On 10/28/05, Ryan Guill <[EMAIL PROTECTE
hey ray, somewhat on and off topic,
do you know if it is possible to modify the cfdump structure?
particularly the stylesheet. I had a developer ping me the other day
about the cfdump stylesheet color specifications did not use pound
signs, something like color: 336633;
He said it was using a br
Thanks for the clarification and the tips Ray...much appreciated (one part
of CF I've never really looked under the hood) ;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PR
Something else to consider. My starfish project handles debugging
info, stuff like the time it took to do X. It does NOT handle erorrs.
However...
It IS possible to modify error behaviour. I've written to blog entries on this.
This entry:
http://ray.camdenfamily.com/index.cfm/2005/7/14/More-CFMX
Some good points Jim,...thanks...good points to ponder for sure..
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com
~~
and what's even better is a gool ole Oracle error
Error ORA-00060
What, that's it? Really? Are you serious? I can't get ANY more insight
than that? I mean, you had to notice that it was a deadlock and then
look up the code in the internal database. So it was actually MORE
difficult to show
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 2:36 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: debugging complaint
>
> Hey All,
>
> You know it just hit me that CF debugging could be so much more
> informative in cer
yep...so much better...it makes me laugh everytime I see a .NET error...like
reading a foreign language
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.elec
> I am, of course, only messing with you here Bryan. However, I do think
> that this is one of those sort of, "just how much IS enough" type of
> things. CF's error messages and debugging, in my opinion, are infinitely
> better than most languages/software.
>
> --Ferg
It's Friday...I'd expect noth
>CF's error messages and debugging, in my opinion, are infinitely
> better than most languages/software.
amen. We dont often realise how good we have it.
--
Ryan Guill
BlueEyesDevelopment
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.ryanguill.com
(270) 217.2399
got google talk? Chat me at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Coldf
Should it also look at the code in question and try to fix it for you?
Should it suggest a page in the CFWACK where you can read about this
particular error? How about if it included a quick-link which would
automatically send a message to the HOF message board to ask others how
to fix it? Mayb
> From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tried, but couldn't get the mirror in the right position to
> see anything.
>
> :)
LOL. That's because you are too busy watching your neighbor try on her new
"purchases" (head over to cf-community for the rest of the story) :-)
> Tried, but couldn't get the mirror in the right position to see anything.
>
> :)
>
> Ray
Yep it's Friday alright ;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
Yeah I'll have to sneek a peak at Ray's Starfish ;-)
but I guess I'm really wondering why MM doesn't add something that seems
so simple?
Thanks Charlie
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell
Tried, but couldn't get the mirror in the right position to see anything.
:)
Ray
Charlie Griefer wrote:
> I don't know if it's the answer you seek... but have you looked at
> Ray's Starfish? (there's a question i never pictured myself asking).
>
>
> http://ray.camdenfamily.com/index.cfm/2005/1
I don't know if it's the answer you seek... but have you looked at
Ray's Starfish? (there's a question i never pictured myself asking).
http://ray.camdenfamily.com/index.cfm/2005/10/24/Starfish-ColdFusion-Debugger-Version-0-Released
On 10/28/05, Bryan Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey
Hey All,
You know it just hit me that CF debugging could be so much more informative in
certain situations...and I wonder if anyone can tell me why it isn't?? ;-)
Here's a great example to do with CFCs
Pass an argument of type numeric to a method (but the value passed is not
numeric). So we g
22 matches
Mail list logo
