Hey all:
I'm tasked with the job of reworking someone else's FB CF code, and one
thing that is driving me crazy is that the person who originally wrote
the code dropped in s many cfoutput's that it's really not readable.
Is there a performance benefit for doing this vs just cfoutputting
on a
lot of layout code. Not sure if there is a major difference in performance,
suppose it depends on the amount of code in the block?
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2005 18:09
To: CF-Talk
Subject: multiple cfoutputs vs one as a wrapper
it depends on the amount of code in the block?
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2005 18:09
To: CF-Talk
Subject: multiple cfoutputs vs one as a wrapper
Hey all:
I'm tasked with the job of reworking someone else's FB CF code, and one
That was the case on CF5 and lower, because they did runtime parsing
of the CF, but with CFMX onward, the CF is compiled on the first
request, so the parsing/compiling complexity doesn't have any effect
on subsequent requests. In other words, having one or many CFOUTPUT
tags only affects the
Thanks BB! That's exactly what I needed to prove my point.
Barney Boisvert wrote:
That was the case on CF5 and lower, because they did runtime parsing
of the CF, but with CFMX onward, the CF is compiled on the first
request, so the parsing/compiling complexity doesn't have any effect
on
Andy...this is old news and only applied prior to CF 5 I believe.
The difference in processing time is quite insignificant (used to be more
significant)so I weigh that against how much cleaner the code looks and
is to maintain when using a whole file wrapper (not opening and closing
Does he have cfsetting enablecfoutputonly=yes on that page?Just a
thought.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: multiple cfoutputs vs one as a wrapper
That makes sense. Although, I'm
Bugzilla is a pretty decent one. I know it integrates with a few of
the more popular open source source control programs like CVS and
Subversion.
http://www.bugzilla.org/features/
Might be worth looking into.
Dave
On Sep 8, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Ray Champagne wrote:
Hey all:
I'm tasked with
Well, I wasn't aware of that change in CFMX, useful info. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2005 18:20
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: multiple cfoutputs vs one as a wrapper
That was the case on CF5 and lower, because they did runtime
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: multiple cfoutputs vs one as a wrapper
That makes sense. Although, I'm definitely inclined to think this person
had no idea of performance issues, since there are lines that look like
this:
cfoutput
???
wrong topic? :)
David Livingston wrote:
Bugzilla is a pretty decent one. I know it integrates with a few of
the more popular open source source control programs like CVS and
Subversion.
http://www.bugzilla.org/features/
Might be worth looking into.
Dave
On Sep 8, 2005, at
on the amount of code in the block?
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2005 18:09
To: CF-Talk
Subject: multiple cfoutputs vs one as a wrapper
Hey all:
I'm tasked with the job of reworking someone else's FB CF code, and one
thing
on the amount of code in the block?
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 September 2005 18:09
To: CF-Talk
Subject: multiple cfoutputs vs one as a wrapper
Hey all:
I'm tasked with the job of reworking someone else's FB CF code, and one
thing that is driving
13 matches
Mail list logo
