Re: ooa, ood, oop and design patterns

2005-03-31 Thread Scott Barnes
As Joe points out CFCDev is the happy-joy-land in terms of this subject, - be warned stay on topic - as i'm popping in / out of this list a lot over the years and see quite a lot of bantering/thread hijacking/flaming etc back and forth (more power to the list i guess we are all stressed hehehe)

Re: ooa, ood, oop and design patterns

2005-03-31 Thread Jared Rypka-Hauer - CMG, LLC
Always nice to see a new comrade crawl out of the woodwork. :) I have to say, though, I'm kind of conflicted over the idea of adding lists to the array of available choices... (CF is leaking into my conversational speech... ugh.) Anyway... I tend to think that more choice is a good thing. I

Re: ooa, ood, oop and design patterns

2005-03-31 Thread Scott Barnes
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 05:52:31 -0600, Jared Rypka-Hauer - CMG, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Always nice to see a new comrade crawl out of the woodwork. :) heh yeah, I decided to jump into ol CF-Talk and poke around... (hope I'm not spamming all too much). I have to say, though, I'm kind of

Re: ooa, ood, oop and design patterns

2005-03-31 Thread Rick Mason
Scott, Everyone points you to CFCDev for CF OOP and it is an interesting list. I subscribed for a while before they dropped digest mode. But CFCDev is high on OOP theory with great debates of different theoretical approaches. What might be nice is a list aimed at practical implementation as

Re: ooa, ood, oop and design patterns

2005-03-31 Thread Aaron Rouse
I do not reall see why the CFCDev list could not have both on it, it is CFCDev is a listserv for the discussion of all things CFC after all which to me means it is not even solely about OO and so on. Just a matter of people being on it and posting about the none bleeding edge. I am on it but

Re: ooa, ood, oop and design patterns

2005-03-31 Thread Scott Barnes
Aye i won't be the ruler of of thine list creation policies, if everyone feels strongly about it then i'll happily put my email addy in the subscript of wherever it may lie. I simply think that consolidating into an area such as CFC which even in OOP theory has lots of relivance would make more

ooa, ood, oop and design patterns

2005-03-28 Thread Brian Holder
i've been reading alot of blogs lately that are beginning to seriously address and examine the new frontier of oo-ness that cfmx has introduced to us as cf developers. i love it and would like to see more - in fact, i was wondering if it is now time to devote a list that can aggregate our

Re: ooa, ood, oop and design patterns

2005-03-28 Thread Joe Rinehart
Hey Brian, You may want to check out the CFCDev list - http://www.cfczone.org/listserv.cfm . It's not as heavily trafficed as this one, but there are some heavy OO conversations there from time to time. The Mach-II and Tartan mailing lists can also be interesting. -Joe -- Get Glued! The

Re: ooa, ood, oop and design patterns

2005-03-28 Thread Brian Holder
thanks joe - will check it out. btw, your blog has been a great resource. greatly admire your insight. i have been long silent in the community, but hope to contribute more going forward (as i can - you know how that goes). kudos on model-glue! brian

RE: ooa, ood, oop and design patterns

2005-03-28 Thread Calvin Ward
: Monday, March 28, 2005 6:56 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: ooa, ood, oop and design patterns thanks joe - will check it out. btw, your blog has been a great resource. greatly admire your insight. i have been long silent in the community, but hope to contribute more going forward (as i can - you know