Wow, I can't believe I didn't think of using a temporary table to store the
dynamic data while it's being edited, that's a great idea. I can't use session
variables because it's a grid and would be considered a complex data type. (I
was under the impression that session variables can only hold
Wow, I can't believe I didn't think of using a temporary table to store the
dynamic data while it's being edited, that's a great
idea. I can't use session variables because it's a grid and would be
considered a complex data type. (I was under the
impression that session variables can only
Thanks Justin, I wasn't aware that a dynamic query was lost once the page was
finished loading. Does the same rule apply to structures? Perhaps I can use a
structure to hold the data and update it as changes are made. Basically, I
don't want the physical database being updated until the submit
normal variables only exists for the duration of the CF request.
you need to use session scope if you want persistence that is specific
to each user.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Ray Meade raym...@yahoo.com wrote:
Thanks Justin, I wasn't aware that a dynamic query was lost once the page was
Thanks Justin, I wasn't aware that a dynamic query was lost
once the page was finished loading. Does the same rule apply
to structures?
Yes, that would apply to all variables unless you store them in
persistent memory (e.g. database, session scope, write to a file,
etc.). In your case I
...I'm not sure how to update the dynamic query.
Hi Ray, I don't know much about the mechanics of your application, but
remember that once the HTML has been generated and the page loaded on
the client, the ColdFusion process is finished and that dynamic query
doesn't exist in memory anymore
I'm writing an app. for an auto repair shop that has a Flash cfgrid containing
quantity, description, price and total cost (the quantity times the price).
Right now, the initial total cost is being calculated in a view in the
database. I've created a dynamic query (using queryNew) to hold all
Hi all,
hoping for some advice with querying a query - at least I think that's what's a
good fit here but feel free to advise otherwise.
I've got a folder which contains 35,000 folders. I've also got a table with
lots of records, where the roomid column matches the name of one of the
Um, did you try the where clause? You said it didn't work - how did it
not work? Can you show us the full code and the error?
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Stefan Richter
ste...@flashcomguru.com wrote:
Hi all,
hoping for some advice with querying a query - at least I think that's what's
Yes, QoQ will work here.
!--- get your folders ---
cfdirectory action=list name=roomList type=dir
directory=#roomsDir#
!--- get the rooms from the DB ---
cfquery datasource=#dsn# name=roomsDB
SELECT roomid
FROM rooms
/cfquery
cfoutput query=roomList
!--- loop through
I've got a folder which contains 35,000 folders.
Setting aside your QoQ question, you may have problems simply
traversing a folder with this many items in it.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
http://training.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software is a Veteran-Owned Small
Thanks.
Guess what I was trying to avoid was a loop with 35,000 queries... I was trying
to come up wit a clever way to do this in one SQL statement. One issue I
noticed is that QoQ does not to seem to (easily?) support joins.
Then again I'm no SQL ninja by any means.
S
On 31 Jan 2011, at
Thanks Dave,
listing the folders performs a lot better than I expected, so that's not my
issue here.
Cheers
Stefan
On 31 Jan 2011, at 17:57, Dave Watts wrote:
I've got a folder which contains 35,000 folders.
Setting aside your QoQ question, you may have problems simply
traversing
-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: Query of query help
Thanks.
Guess what I was trying to avoid was a loop with 35,000 queries... I was
trying to come up wit a clever way to do this in one SQL statement. One
issue I noticed is that QoQ does not to seem to (easily?) support joins.
Then again I'm
I was trying something like this:
cfquery name=orphanRooms dbtype=query
select * from roomList
WHERE name = 'x'
cfloop query=roomsDBOR roomList.name = '#roomid#' /cfloop
/cfquery
I think I am getting somewhere with it. Anything inherently wrong with this?
Stefan
On 31 Jan 2011, at
Ah great, an interesting approach. Many thanks.
Stefan
On 31 Jan 2011, at 20:10, Jason Fisher wrote:
Stefan,
This might work ... can't remember if the IN () function works in QoQ or
not.
!--- get a list of all the rooms from the DB (after you query) ---
cfset roomList =
...
From: Stefan Richter ste...@flashcomguru.com
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2011 3:21 PM
To: cf-talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: Query of query help
I was trying something like this:
cfquery name=orphanRooms dbtype=query
select * from roomList
Hi Barney
Your answer was cut - would you mind resending please
~|
Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know
on the House of Fusion mailing lists
Archive:
I have no idea what that was. My sent mail has the same blank
message, but I didn't reply. WITH ROLLUP is the clause you want
though, if your DB supports it.
cheers,
barneyb
--
Barney Boisvert
bboisv...@gmail.com
http://www.barneyb.com/
On Jul 17, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Seamus Campbell
I've got some code that uses the JExcelAPI for converting queries to
Excel spreadsheets.
It's got some support for formulas, so theoretically you could wow
the people you need to send it to by not only having the sums there,
but having them update if they change the numbers in the various
I have a database (access at the moment) for members of an organisation. The
members are scattered throughout (mostly in one state) Australia (with a couple
in the US) They all are one of three language groups.
I need to export an excel spreadsheet with a count of members from each
language
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Seamus
Campbellcoldfus...@boldacious.com wrote:
I have a database (access at the moment) for members of an organisation. The
members are scattered throughout (mostly in one state) Australia (with a
couple in the US) They all are one of three language groups.
Cool, yeah I never remember until I do it when an aggregate query is going to
want HAVING vs WHERE. Glad it's working for you!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free
- Original Message -
From: Jason Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cool, yeah I never remember until I do it when an aggregate query is going
to want HAVING vs WHERE. Glad it's working for you!
This bites me too when I'm not paying attention. Just remember that the
WHERE applies to the
In MS SQL Server it's ISNULL(), but can't speak for other platforms. Can't
recall what it is in Oracle, might just be NULL().
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free
In MS SQL Server it's ISNULL(), but can't speak for other platforms.
Can't recall what it is in Oracle, might just be NULL().
IIRC in Oracle it is NVL. There is also COALESCE, which is usually a safe bet
with most databases.
didn't work, got an error. changed the isnull to ifnull, got a invalid use of
a group function error... I don't even know how to fix that...=(
Try this, I think it's what you're looking for:
SELECT SUM(ISNULL(o.qty, 0)) as sold, p.sku, p.name, p.points, p.
short_description, p.quantity,
NM, got it... changed the where clause to having and moved it below the group
by... seems to be working so far!
Thanks!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
I have a MySQL query to pull all products from the database, no problem. I am
trying to get it to only display prodcuts that are in stock, the value should
be sold p.quantity in the following query. however, when sold appears as
null (very often) it removes the full record, which I don't
Try this, I think it's what you're looking for:
SELECT SUM(ISNULL(o.qty, 0)) as sold, p.sku, p.name, p.points,
p.short_description, p.quantity, p.image
FROM tblproducts as p LEFT JOIN
tblorder_list as o ON p.sku = o.sku #can_afford#
WHERE SUM(ISNULL(o.qty, 0)) p.quantity
GROUP BY p.sku
i believe the correct function to use is IFNULL(), not ISNULL()...
Azadi Saryev
Sabai-dee.com
http://www.sabai-dee.com/
Jason Fisher wrote:
Try this, I think it's what you're looking for:
SELECT SUM(ISNULL(o.qty, 0)) as sold, p.sku, p.name, p.points,
p.short_description, p.quantity,
no luck...
I do need the group by clause, my actual query is much larger than the one
posted. the problem, for example is this:
for five people, paid=no, for five others, paid=yes under one parent
sponsor.
I am now getting a result of 10, but I need the result to be 5, only
counting those
Hard to say what is going on. The following works fine for me:
SELECT node.userCity,count(node.userCity)
FROM core.users AS node, core.users AS parent
WHERE parent.userName = node.userFirstName
AND node.userCity = 'Pasadena'
GROUP BY node.userCity
I seem to get the correct number based on the
I'm pretty sure I will smack my head when I hear the answer, but I'll ask
anyway...
I am using a select count() query to get the number of people directly
sponsored by a person... this works fine, the problem is that I only want to
have the query count people that meet a certain qualification.
Well, is the paid field a character field or a number field in the DB?
and just FYI, you can always go #querryName.Recordcount# to get a
count via CF. :)
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:23 PM, Jessica Kennedy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure I will smack my head when I hear the answer, but
SELECT COUNT(node.name)
FROM tbl1 as node, tbl1 as parent
WHERE parent.sponsor=node.name AND node.paid='yes'
GROUP BY node.name
GROUP BY should only be used if you're selecting non-aggregates along with
your aggregate.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf
We are trying to tease out the following:
SELECT ProjNum, ClientName, tblProj.Title, StartDate
FROM tblProj
WHERE (tblProj.Title LIKE '%Cost Plan%')
OR(tblProj.Title LIKE '%Cost Allocation Plan%')
OR (tblProj.Title LIKE '%CAP%')
The problem is that OR
: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 1:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: MSSQL Query help - Finding an exact word in a field
We are trying to tease out the following:
SELECT ProjNum, ClientName, tblProj.Title, StartDate
FROM tblProj
WHERE (tblProj.Title LIKE '%Cost Plan%')
OR(tblProj.Title
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: MSSQL Query help - Finding an exact word in a field
We are trying to tease out the following:
SELECT ProjNum, ClientName, tblProj.Title, StartDate
FROM tblProj
WHERE (tblProj.Title LIKE '%Cost Plan%')
OR(tblProj.Title LIKE '%Cost
In MySQL... '%CAP %' works.
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Guido [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 12:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: MSSQL Query help - Finding an exact word in a field
We are trying to tease out the following:
SELECT ProjNum, ClientName
, but won't return records with CAPTAIN or
CAPITAL.
At least I think it will. Try it out. I am not in front of a MS SQL server.
-Original Message-
From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MSSQL Query help - Finding
I am full of incomplete thoughts.
I _think_ you can abbreviate with a-z and 1-9 instead of typing out the
characters.
-Original Message-
From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MSSQL Query help - Finding an exact
thoughts.
I _think_ you can abbreviate with a-z and 1-9 instead of typing out the
characters.
-Original Message-
From: Chad Gray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 2:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: MSSQL Query help - Finding an exact word in a field
I re
I am using Oracle and I have a table for expenditures that stores a person's ID
when the expenditures is approved. The person's ID is from a People table.
When I query, I want to make a new variable that references the other table to
put in their full name. I have two problems doing this.
1
daniel kessler wrote:
1 - I'm not so good at sql and the join only works if there's an id in the
approved_by field. This is going to be empty unless the ticket has been
approved, but I still want it to work whether it's approved or not. Is that
an outter join?
Yes it will be an LEFT
I had continued to try and figure it out after I sent the email. I did figure
out a way to make it work.
FROM expenditures e, people p
WHERE e.approved_by = people.id (+)
In Oracle, the + does the outer join. And it worked well, but it wasn't
explicit. I don't know sql well enough to read
daniel kessler wrote:
I had continued to try and figure it out after I sent the email. I did
figure out a way to make it work.
FROM expenditures e, people p
WHERE e.approved_by = people.id (+)
In Oracle, the + does the outer join.
Yes, that is the original outer join syntax for Oracle.
select *, exists (
select *
from orders
where date between #date1# and #date2#
) as hasOrdered
from customers
order by name, id
Use CFQUERYPARAM, of course.
Another variation is a left join. Ditto on using cfqueryparam.
SELECT
c.ID,
c.Name,
c.Email,
SUM(CASE WHEN o.Date IS NULL THEN 0
I dont believe this is working with Access DB
SUM(CASE WHEN o.Date IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE 1 END) ordersFound
C S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
select *, exists (
select *
from orders
where date between #date1# and #date2#
) as hasOrdered
from customers
order by name, id
Use CFQUERYPARAM, of
I dont believe this is working with Access DB
SUM(CASE WHEN o.Date IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE 1 END) ordersFound
I think Access's version of CASE is IIF(..). Try using IIF instead and also try
the query Barney suggested. One of them should work.
I will try to make this as simple as possible. Any help would be greatly
appreciated. I have 2 tables like below.
tblCustomers
===
ID | Name | Email |
1, John, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2, Bob, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
3, Steve, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
select *, exists (
select *
from orders
where date between #date1# and #date2#
) as hasOrdered
from customers
order by name, id
Use CFQUERYPARAM, of course.
cheers,
barneyb
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Brian Sheridan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I will try to make this as simple as possible.
is the users who have not signed off on
viewing
one or more documents and the documents on which they've failed to sign
off.
Subject: query help
From: Sonny Savage
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:39:57 -0400
Thread:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/thread.cfm/threadid
Question: Do you also want a result in the case where there is no USER_DOCS
record for a given USER and DOC record (FULL OUTER JOIN)?
On Sat, Mar 8, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Josh McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got three tables like this (simplified):
USERS
user_id
user_name
DOCS
doc_id
This query will return all users and docs that have a relationship
established but don't have a sign-off record:
SELECT u.user_name
, d.doc_name
FROM user_docs ud
INNER JOIN users u
ON ud.user_id = u.user_id
INNER JOIN docs d
ON ud.doc_id = d.doc_id
WHERE ud.signoff_id
one or more documents and the documents on which they've failed to sign off.
Subject: query help
From: Sonny Savage
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:39:57 -0400
Thread:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/thread.cfm/threadid:55471#300843
Question: Do you also want a result in the case where
.
Subject: query help
From: Sonny Savage
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 08:39:57 -0400
Thread:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/thread.cfm/threadid:55471#300843
Question: Do you also want a result in the case where there is no
USER_DOCS
record for a given USER and DOC record (FULL OUTER
The nice thing about SQL is you can often write the query almost how you word
the problem:
SELECT user_id,user_name,doc_id,doc_name
FROMUSERS,DOCS
WHERE NOT EXISTS (
SELECT signoff_id
FROMUSER_DOCS
WHERE user_id = USERS.user_id
As a side note, I generally recommend that you have a compound primary key
in a join table. So, USERS_DOCS would have a compound primary key of user_id
and doc_id and wouldn't need another column. This helps to enforce
referential integrity.
Or create a unique index / constraint of the two
I'm really looking for a solution with only one query using joins. It should
be possible to do this with a couple of joins.
This query, suggested by Steve, would work well if the tables remained
small:
SELECT user_id,user_name,doc_id,doc_name FROM USERS,DOCS WHERE NOT EXISTS
( SELECT
In large tables, though, I don't think it's going to be a very good
solution.
Why not? It should perform fine if there are indexes on the tables. Make a
couple of test tables and populate them with a whole load of numbers and
test it before rejecting it ;)
Anybody know why this doesn't
Josh,
I use WHERE EXISTS and WHERE NOT EXISTS with some frequency and I have never
run into any performance problems with it.
In SQL Server, each join statement needs an on clause, even if it is 1 = 1.
I ran some quick tests with about 50 rows in one table, 200 in another, and
about a dozen
OK, so let's just say that the where not exists option is comparable in
efficiency. I ran the query and was greeted by every row in the tables. 70K
results instead of the 60 or so I should be getting.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8
Josh,
The SQL I posted worked for me in my tests. If you deviated from that, can you
post the SQL that you used?
Assuming the join table doesn't have any duplicate rows (and no rows exist in
the join table without a match in both of the other tables) then the resultset
of the query should
I've got three tables like this (simplified):
USERS
user_id
user_name
DOCS
doc_id
doc_name
USER_DOCS
signoff_id
user_id
doc_id
I need all user names and doc names where the combination doesn't exist in the
signoff table USER_DOCS. For example, user 12 hasn't signed of on doc 9 and
user 6
By the way, this is a MySQL DB.
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w
Archive:
I've never worked in MySQL, but take a look at the below. It should get you
in the right direction. BTW, it's a 2 step process. 1st, your combining
the User and Docs tables to get a list. Then you take that list and bounce
it agaist the USER_DOCS table and show anything where SIGNOFF is NULL.
SELECT t.groupid,
t.groupname
FROM @tblgroups t
INNER JOIN @tblgrouptypes gt ON gt.groupid = t.groupid
WHERE gt.grouptype in ('College','Jewish') -- This would be dynamic
GROUP BY t.groupid,
t.groupname
HAVING count(*) = 2 -- This would be dynamic
ORDER BY t.groupname
: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 6:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Need query help
No, that'll get one or the other - he wants ones that are both.
Aliasing will work, something like this:
James, I think I got this to work. My first tests are good. I didn't
mention
Could do a UNION to gather the results
-Original Message-
From: Brad Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 10:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Need query help
If you query is highly dynamic, this way may not be best. Let's say the
user can specify groups
What would that look like? Unioned result sets are not mutually
dependant, but Will needs all his criteria to be met.
~Brad
-Original Message-
From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 10:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Need query help
Could do a UNION
This should work and is much clearer that your original statement.
SELECT t.groupid,
t.groupimage,
t.groupname,
t.groupcity,
t.state,
t.voicingid,
t.groupcontactperson,
t.country,
t.region,
x.groupid,
, 2008 10:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Need query help
This should work and is much clearer that your original statement.
SELECT t.groupid,
t.groupimage,
t.groupname,
t.groupcity,
t.state,
t.voicingid,
t.groupcontactperson,
t.country
Brad Wood wrote:
If you query is highly dynamic, this way may not be best. Let's say the
user can specify groups that are of type college, jewish, preschool,
catholic, and skinny. Now, you have to join to the type table 5 times
and that ain't looking too good.
Joining is what databases are
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 12:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Need query help
Joining is what databases are good at.
===
Flying is what birds are good at; but why send the whole
Will Tomlinson wrote:
Hey,
I've got groups that can have one or more types associated with them. I have
a linking table that I'm querying and filtering. But I'm not getting the
results I need.
Example: A group can be both 'College' and 'Jewish', as listed in the many
linking table -
Hey,
I've got groups that can have one or more types associated with them. I have a
linking table that I'm querying and filtering. But I'm not getting the results
I need.
Example: A group can be both 'College' and 'Jewish', as listed in the many
linking table - tblgrouptypes_x.grouptype
In
To make your query more readable, can you alias your tables?
SELECT g.groupid, g.groupimage, g.groupname, g.groupcity, g.state,
g.voicingid, g.groupcontactperson, g.country, g.region,
gtx.groupid, gtx.grouptype, gt.grouptype
FROM tblgroups g, tblgrouptypes gt, tblgrouptypes_x
If you take out one or the other, does it return the results?
Yes. I get valid results if I remove one of the AND's. I can just pull jewish
groups for instance.
Originally, I used IN ('jewish',college').
But that returns ALL jewish groups, and ALL college groups. My client wants it
to
Try changing your AND statement to an OR statement:
AND (tblgrouptypes_x.grouptype = 'College' OR tblgrouptypes_x.grouptype =
'Jewish')
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 5:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Need query help
Hey
: Monday, March 03, 2008 5:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Need query help
Try changing your AND statement to an OR statement:
AND (tblgrouptypes_x.grouptype = 'College' OR tblgrouptypes_x.grouptype
=
'Jewish')
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday
:
AND (tblgrouptypes_x.grouptype = 'College' OR tblgrouptypes_x.grouptype =
'Jewish')
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 5:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Need query help
Hey,
I've got groups that can have one or more types
I'm a little unsure of what your query is expected to return. If a
group can have multiple types, then I assume that there is a one-to-many
relationship between groups and types, where a single group record has
one or more type records.
Correct.
You are returning type in your query, so a
If there's a group that's jewish and college, I just need a single
record returned.
=
Then removed type from the select list, group by everything else with an
or equivalent in your where clause and add the having count(*) 1
to the end.
That will only return groups which
If you HAVE to have both jewish and college types and only one record
returned, try this:
SELECT tblgroups.*, !--- i wouldn't do this, just saving space here ;) ---
tblgrouptypes_x.groupid,
tblgrouptypes_x.grouptype !--- perhaps returning this value is misleading
as it can only tell you one of
No, that'll get one or the other - he wants ones that are both.
Aliasing will work, something like this:
James, I think I got this to work. My first tests are good. I didn't mention
this is a highly dynamic query. I have quite a few other filters in play, but
your example would work nicely
It was pretty close. Running it in one direction, knowing that table B
has extra records, works fine.
- Original Message -
From: Dawson, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 7:59 PM
Subject: RE: Query Help - find unique rows
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Query Help - find unique rows in two similar tables
I have two tables with identical structures. The data in the two tables
is _nearly_ identical, with one table having a few additional rows. I
need to find those additional rows.
I want to query the two tables and find
PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Query Help - find unique rows in two similar tables
SELECT
a.*
,b.*
FROM
TableA a
FULL OUTER JOIN TableB b
ON a.id = b.id
WHERE
a.id IS NULL
OR
b.id IS NULL
(Untested)
M!ke
I have two tables with identical structures. The data in the two tables
is _nearly_ identical, with one table having a few additional rows. I
need to find those additional rows.
I want to query the two tables and find the rows in one or the other that
are not present in both. It would be OK
If ROUND isn't there, look for another rounding function like CEILING, FLOOR
etc.
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Dave l
Sent: 09 December 2007 04:18
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: query help
if i change the select statement to:
SELECT center_id, address1, city, state, postalcode
-
From: Dave l
Sent: 09 December 2007 04:18
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: query help
if i change the select statement to:
SELECT center_id, address1, city, state, postalcode, state,
ROUND((ACOS((SIN(#lat_A#/57.2958) * SIN(#lat_B#/57.2958)) +
it changes the error
Looks like CEIL() or CEILING() is the function you're looking for:
http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.2/ref/refderby.pdf
HTH,
Jon
On Dec 8, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Dave l wrote:
if i change the select statement to:
SELECTcenter_id, address1, city, state, postalcode, state,
I'll take a look at those
thanks guys
Looks like CEIL() or CEILING() is the function you're looking for:
http://db.apache.org/derby/docs/10.2/ref/refderby.pdf
HTH,
Jon
On Dec 8, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Dave l wrote:
if i change the select statement to:
SELECT center_id,
change one thing it errors on another lol
now it errors on the ,
I'll take a look at those
thanks guys
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade to ColdFusion 8 and integrate with Adobe Flex
i am trying to write a quite tutorial for learncf on a dealer locator.
I guess you have to use one of the included db's so I am using one of the derby
ones cause well.. thats all there is and this query is choking on it, it works
on mysql but I know diddlysquat about derby
the query
SELECT
if i change the select statement to:
SELECT center_id, address1, city, state, postalcode, state,
ROUND((ACOS((SIN(#lat_A#/57.2958) * SIN(#lat_B#/57.2958)) +
it changes the error to:
'ROUND' is not recognized as a function or procedure.
so i might be sol on this tut
I got it fixed.
Thanks,
Will
~|
Download the latest ColdFusion 8 utilities including Report Builder,
plug-ins for Eclipse and Dreamweaver updates.
http;//www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs%5adobecf8%5Fbeta
Hey,
I have 3 tables - one to many rel.
tblreports
reportid PK
lotsmorefieldsforfiltering
tblquestioncomments
questioncommentid PK
reportid FK
questionid FK
tblquestions
questionidPK
Originally I just needed a question count based off a specific question ID. As
my
I have three tables, worship_songs, worship_sets, worship_song_lists.
worship_songs:
worship_songID
worship_song_title
worship_song_lyrics
worship_sets:
worship_setID
worship_set_title
worship_set_date
worship_song_lists:
worship_song_listID
worship_songID_fk
worship_setID_fk
I have a spry
1 - 100 of 484 matches
Mail list logo
