is the CFIDE just under the cf instance or do you have a IIS mapping
pointing to the one installed in the inetpub/wwwroot/CFIDE?
Never had any issue after adding a virtual CFIDE for each subdomain.
--
João Fernandes
http://www.onflexwithcf.org
http://www.riapt.org
--~--~-~--~~---
Andrew, please be sure to read ALL Charlies (or anyone else's for that
matter) response before posting again. Yep...the whole thing!
It will help us all :)
On Jan 8, 6:10 pm, "Charlie Arehart \(lists account\)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew, I know people hate to see these kind of debates
All iis cfide's are virtual. There are no cfide's under wwwroot :)
On 1/8/08, João Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> is the CFIDE just under the cf instance or do you have a IIS mapping
> pointing to the one installed in the inetpub/wwwroot/CFIDE?
> Never had any issue after adding a virtu
Charlie,
I never knew about the cfhtmlhead tag, and made the assumption that it
was added.
However in my defence, I got told to use that to get what I needed
done for the new Ajax UI in cf8. This came from people who should know
how it works, regardless of when this tag was introduced. I do see
I wasn't speaking of cfide deployed under the webroot but the one that
is installed under the cfusion server when you deploy a new instance
(multiserver install in this case). invoking that cfide through the
cfusion port worked fine but once I was using through IIS, some files
where missing (i
J,
I completely understand. All my cfide's are virtual in iis,
specifically to avoid the issue you describe (missing images etc)
I believe you and I do it the same way.
Cheers.
On 1/8/08, João Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wasn't speaking of cfide deployed under the webroot but the o
I've been meaning to do so for a long time. I don't think one
particular instance is broken as they are all configured the same. I
think it's domain cookie related. Just a hunch.
On 1/8/08, João Fernandes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try to sniff the requests with a working and a non working su
Try to sniff the requests with a working and a non working subdomain and
compare them.
--
João Fernandes
http://www.onflexwithcf.org
http://www.riapt.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie
... Some JS code.
I've never used cfsavecontent to use cfhtmlhead
I simply just use cfhtmlhead and place my javascript within its text
attribute.
You do need to make some minor syntax changes to your JS as far as quotes
go.
does everyone else use cfsavecontent when giving head to
"giving javascript to the head" sorry
sending probably would have been better
M@
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To un
Andrew, consider the fact that while you are a Software Engineer, you
need to look at Adobe, and CFML, as a Vendor. They cannot afford to
willy nilly break backwards compat. You have no idea how many lines of
code out there use stuff like parameterExists. Yes - the language
would be 'nicer' withou
Glad you clarified that, Mr. Buzzy. I was about to use your comment as
nomination for a new CFEmmy category next year: most perverse coding
practice. :-)
/charlie
_
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of M@ Bourke
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 8:17 AM
Doh!.I was just so tickled by the Freudian slip that I wrote in haste. :-)
It didn't help that Mr. B had also written 2 notes (on the cf admin issue
thread) just before I read your notes. Sorry, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/charlie
_
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I aint Mr Buzzy
I'm M@ like on the floor
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [
Justin, you don't show using type="application/pdf" in the CFCONTENT. I
realize you may be saying that it was working for you as long as the PDF
wasn't multi-page, but how about adding that? Or it could also be your lack
of reset="Yes", if any other content had been generated on the page prior to
Ray,
I agree with what you have stated, but it would have been better to enhance
one function than create a separate one, just my opinion that's all and they
have alpha and beta testers that can check for breakage.
Andrew Scott
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
www.aegeon.com.au
Phon
Cheers, thanks Charlie will give this a go.
On Jan 9, 5:10 am, "Charlie Arehart \(lists account\)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Justin, you don't show using type="application/pdf" in the CFCONTENT. I
> realize you may be saying that it was working for you as long as the PDF
> wasn't multi-page, b
I personally use cfsavecontent if I need to save more than a few
words... or if there's quotes and punctuation involved. I think it makes
for more readable code.
M@ Bourke wrote:
>
> ... Some JS code.
>
>
>
> I've never used cfsavecontent to use cfhtmlhead
> I simply just use cf
On Jan 8, 2008 4:50 PM, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with what you have stated, but it would have been better to enhance
> one function than create a separate one, just my opinion that's all and they
> have alpha and beta testers that can check for breakage.
>
Heh, they can h
I agree. But this is exactly why we *deprecate*:
It's formal acknowledgement that there's a better way of doing
something, an official statement saying the old functionality shouldn't
be used.
Raymond Camden wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2008 4:50 PM, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I
IMHO there are three "beasts"
- undocumented functionality (and therefore unsupported)
- official features
- deprecated functionality.
Just as "undocumented functionality" may evolve into "official
features", I see nothing wrong with moving stuff to be deprecated. Not
the same as dropping it
Unfortunately Peter can't make it.
Instead, Danny Dura from the Platform Evangelism Team will be here on
Thursday 24th Jan. Sorry, but he's on a tight schedule, hence the
date.
Venue details are yet to be confirmed.
More details to follow.
Please put 24th Jan in your diaries. And while you're
I think a few of you are missing what I am trying to say.
I am still trying to confirm this 100%, but so far I have looked at
the code and found that the code is in fact identical in both
DateFormat() & LSDateFormat(). The only difference that I can see is
that LSDateFormat has a wrapper to the m
23 matches
Mail list logo
