Mark Stosberg writes:
To keep this process moving along, I would like add the comment period will
last for one week, until February 19th.
[...]
I don't have time to test this out right now, but as long as it
maintains backwards compat. (which I think it does) it sounds like a
good step
Ron Savage writes:
Hi Folks
I've had an email asking if I could somehow let one of my modules use
HTTP::Server::Simple where the user didn't want to, or couldn't, set up
a stand-alone web server such as Apache.
Then I got to thinking: What are the alternatives to
Michael Peters writes:
Ron Savage wrote:
And, what do people feel about these modules?
Smolder uses H::S::S (via CGI::Application::Server) and it worked great for
development but when it was deployed it would just hang several times during
the
day. So I needed to restart it
Jeff MacDonald writes:
Hi,
I'm cross posting this to CGIApp and FastCGI mailing lists, please
don't hit me :)
I've taken over the development of a Perl/CGI::App in house project.
It has never lived its live in any sort of environment like FastCGI or
mod_perl and now perl
Michael Peters writes:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
In addition to using CGI_APP_RETURN_ONLY, you can also create a tiny
sub-class
of CGI::App-based module, so that html_tmpl_class returns
'HTML::Template::Dumper'.
Then you'll get back a data structure of template instead of an HTML
Mark Stosberg writes:
On Sun, 28 Dec 2008 21:59:02 -0700
Bradley C Bailey cgi...@brad.memoryleak.org wrote:
Hello,
I run my application under CGI::Application::Server during testing, and
recently began sending files with CGI::Application::Plugin::Stream.
However, they
Bradley C Bailey writes:
Richard,
Hope someone can help with this. I'm having a major headache with
authentication and sessions.
With authentication configured to use STORE = Cookie I can login out
OK, but each request generates a new CGISESSID, even when logged in.
Mark Stosberg writes:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:26:20 -0700
George Hartzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that it'd be great to retire
CGI::Application::Dispatch::Server once CGI::Application::Server
covers all of the bases.
Now that our patches in CGI::Application::Server, I
Richard Jones writes:
George Hartzell wrote:
Richard Jones writes:
Anyone managing to get CAP::Authentication, CA::Dispatch and CA::Server
working together?
[..]
What happens if you get rid of your check on the username, define a
LOGIN_RUNMODE, and protect stuff using
Richard Jones writes:
Anyone managing to get CAP::Authentication, CA::Dispatch and CA::Server
working together?
In cgiapp_init:
$self-authen_config(
LOGIN_URL = '/app/login', # CA::Server sends /app/* to Dispatch
);
Then in cgiapp_prerun:
Richard Jones writes:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
It doesn't seem to happen in an identical setup running under mod_perl,
so I presume it's a 'feature' of the CAD::Server / HTTP::Server. Is this
a known issue, and one of the caveats alluded to in the CAD::Server
docs? Never been a
Mark Stosberg writes:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 14:02:37 +0100
Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Richard Jones wrote:
That value of 'id' (2 in this case) persisted from the previous action,
and will continue to live indefinitely across multiple requests until
it is
Mark Stosberg writes:
As Rhesa proposed, he has followed through and released a plugin to add the
Devel::Declare / Method::Signatures magic to CGI::Application:
http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?CGI::Application::Plugin::RunmodeDeclare
Used in combination with Method::Signatures,
Mark Stosberg writes:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:18:02 +0100
Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
As Rhesa proposed, he has followed through and released a plugin to add
the
Devel::Declare / Method::Signatures magic to CGI::Application:
Porta writes:
For all:
Any preferred ORM? Class::DBI ? DBIx::Class? Rose ? Tangram? Something
custom made? I'm missing anyone?
Just curious.
Started with Class::DBI and tried to migrate to DBIx::Class.
Been doing a bunch of stuff w/ Rose::DB::Object and love it.
g.
#
Benjamin Hitz writes:
We have begun a conversion from an old, hand rolled ORM to
DBIx::Class. There are lots of nice properties, but our DB has 120-
odd tables, and the start up time is killing us (ca. 2sec.).
Hopefully, we can resolve the speed issue with PersistantPerl and/or
Mark Stosberg writes:
Patches welcome.
I'd like to provide feedback on various proposed changes to
CGI::Application::Server
Need a way to specify parameters to dispatch()
I disagree. The recommended way to do this to define a 'dispatch_args'
routine in your
Ricardo SIGNES writes:
* Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-17T12:37:04]
Bradley C Bailey wrote:
In CAD::Server it tries to serve files staticly first before sending to
dispatch. I think the best solution would be to specify a way to mark an
entry point in the CA::Server
Ricardo SIGNES writes:
* Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-17T12:37:04]
Bradley C Bailey wrote:
In CAD::Server it tries to serve files staticly first before sending to
dispatch. I think the best solution would be to specify a way to mark an
entry point in the CA::Server
George Hartzell writes:
[...]
static-content.patch extends the entry-points table so that you can
point specific entry-points at directories, which are then used as
the docroot in a call to serve-static.
Some self-feedback.
Around line 83 of the patched Server.pm I checked
Mark Stosberg writes:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:24:05 -0400
Ricardo SIGNES [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-09-17T20:57:37]
::Dispatch::Server prefers static files first, ::Server prefers
dispatching first
I think it is a bug in ::Server
Bradley C Bailey writes:
Mark,
CGI::Application::Dispatch::Server was released in Summer of '07, in part
because CGI::Application::Server didn't have dispatching support.
But soon after, in the fall, CGI::Application::Server was released, which
supports both dispatched and
Richard Jones writes:
George Hartzell wrote:
Richard Jones writes:
Using CGI::Application::Dispatch::Server, I'm getting a weird
phenomenon
occurring:
Can you provide a simplified test case that shows this behaviour, or
share a copy of the app with me to walk
Mark Stosberg writes:
[...]
Titanium 'depends' on the equivalent, CGI::Application::Server, which in
turn works with dispatching. This is mentioned in passing in the
Titanium docs, but perhaps could be highlighted and detailed more.
use CGI::Application::Server;
my $server =
Richard Jones writes:
Using CGI::Application::Dispatch::Server, I'm getting a weird phenomenon
occurring:
my $server = CGI::Application::Dispatch::Server-new(
class= 'MyWebApp::Dispatch',
root_dir = '/path/to/htdocs',
);
$server-run;
Server starts OK. But
Last week I spent a little more time than I care to disclose getting
something that I wrote for CGI::Application::Dispatch::Server running
under lighttpd using fastcgi. All of the necessary bits and hints are
scattered around and really anyone but a Dummy should be all set.
Since I managed to
Cees Hek writes:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Mike. G [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, list
I got one issue when I use the plugin CGI::Application::Plugin::Session
**SNIP**
COOKIE_PARAMS = {
-domain = $this-cfg('site_domain'),
-expires='+40m',
Mark Knoop writes:
[...]
I read this. But being both new to CGI::Application and a bit green on
implementing proper test plans I wondered whether anyone knows of an article
or tutorial that covers this area?
Failing that any one sentence pointers on which approaches work for others
There's also Jason Purdy's CGI::Application::Plugin::Stream, which
reads and write the file in chunks to avoid slurping it all into
memory at once.
http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream/lib/CGI/Application/Plugin/Stream.pm
g.
# CGI::Application community mailing
Ron Savage writes:
[...]
Local::Application is a sub-class of CGI::Application but I was using
CGI::Application::Dispatch::Server as stated. The docs need a patch on
that one.
Are you using CGI::Application::Dispatch at all?
If not, then you should use CGI::Application::Server with
Jason Purdy writes:
This is probably going to start a firestorm, but it's important to have
an opposing view voiced so no one thinks MIME::Lite is fit to be tarred
feathered.
[...]
Thanks for speaking up. I felt kind of silly using something who's
maintainer things is problematic, but
ademmler writes:
Hi C::A users!
I want to show a progress indicator while my cgi script gets
information from my database.
I have read and tested all suggestions, which had been made here
allready, but I can get it work.
I need help please.
What I wanna do is;
I have a
I'd like to have a page that has some form fields at the top and
displays content based on the current values of that form elsewhere on
the page.
I've tried to implement this by having a run mode that displays the
page and is also the target of the form's submission. When things go
well, the
Graham TerMarsch writes:
[...]
Note that I haven't -tried- the following code, but it'd look something like:
package MyApp;
use base 'CGI::Application';
use CGI::Application::Plugin::ValidateRM;
use Data::FormValidator::Constraints qw(:regexp_common);
sub setup {
my
Hi Cees,
Thanks for putting together CAP::{Authentication,Authorization}. They
look like they'll be very useful.
The documentation suggests that CAP::Authorization has a method called
'runmode_authz', which applies restrictions to groups of runmodes,
in much the way that CAP::Authentication's
Hi all,
I've uploaded Test::WWW::Mechanize::CGIApp v 0.05 to CPAN.
The url is:
http://search.cpan.org/~hartzell/Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp-0.05
Please give it a try and let me know how it works for you.
g.
-
Web Archive:
Dan Horne writes:
[...] I guess
Test::WWW::Mechanize is one module to look at, but I should also be looking
at calling my controller code directly as well as going through the front
end.
[...]
I don't have a lot of experience to share, but I have wrapped up a
CGIApp specific extension
Barry Moore writes:
George-
Sorry for the trivial error report. I'd have sworn on my mothers
grave I had Dispatch installed - but that would be unwise since she's
still alive and kicking and in fact I didn't have Dispatch
installed. That's what I get for working with a foggy
I was looking for a make-myself-useful-and-learn-something project on
the cgiapp wiki and came across a call for a Mechanize'd tester for
cgiapp.
I put this together after looking at how the catalyst equivalent
works. I'd appreciate any feedback folks care to throw at it.
It has the following
Jesse Vincent writes:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 06:23:52PM -0800, George Hartzell wrote:
I'd like to be able to run my CGI::Application::Dispatch::Server based
apps under the perl debugger. It wasn't working, in order to get
anything to happen at all I had to submit a request
Hi Jesse,
The patch below passes your test suite, and seems to me to follow a
pattern established by other tools that swap around stdio handles. It
passes HTTP::Server::Simple's tests on my FreeBSD system, and also
allows me to run my CGI::Application::Server based stuff in the
debugger.
I've been playing around with CA::Dispatch and CAP::AutoRunmode, as
cgi's served from under apache22 and using CA::Dispatch::Server. I
discovered that things only behave as expected if I use
CAP::AutoRunmode (or something that uses it) in my instance script.
Once I understood that, I found this
I'd like to be able to run my CGI::Application::Dispatch::Server based
apps under the perl debugger. It wasn't working, in order to get
anything to happen at all I had to submit a request to the socket it
was listening on (in retrospect to make it past an accept call) then
hit a couple of
Hi Stevan and Rob (and the cgiapp community),
I spent a while last night learning to use cgiapp::Plugin::Stream to
return an excel spreadsheet (built w/ Spreadsheet::WriteExcel) in
response to a request.
I had it almost working very quickly, but the file I sent wasn't
something gnumeric could
Hi,
I'm seeing something odd, and thought I'd ask a quick and dirty
question before I tried to boil down a test case that I can share.
I'm playing with an application that uses my (check out the archives)
CGI::Application::Dispatch::Server to catch requests and farm them out
to fairly simple
Mark Stosberg writes:
George Hartzell wrote:
I've mutated the CGI::Application::Server package so that I can run a
little development/debug server for my CGI::Application::Dispatch
based app.
I'd like some feedback on it, is it useful to anyone else and/or
are there things
I've mutated the CGI::Application::Server package so that I can run a
little development/debug server for my CGI::Application::Dispatch
based app.
I'd like some feedback on it, is it useful to anyone else and/or
are there things that I should do differently with/to it?
Did I mention that it's
I'm redoing an existing app as a CGI::Application using Template
Toolkit.
In my mason version I did a set of tabs across the top of the page be
defining an ul/ul and using css to style them into tabs. The
current tab was made to stand out by styling it with a different css
class (called
out his suggestion. I've
attached his message in case it's an interesting alternative for you.
g.
---BeginMessage---
On 9/26/06, George Hartzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
George Hartzell writes:
I have a page that has several forms, each form has a hidden input
named rm which specifies
RA Jones writes:
George Hartzell wrote:
RA Jones writes:
OK, thanks. So the behaviour is caused by FillInForm, and nothing to do
with CAP::Forward. I did see something about ignore_fields but missed
its significance. Makes me wonder if FiF is optimally suited for use
Hi all, it's me again,
I'm having a problem using class::dbi pagers and the Template Toolkit.
I have a data model built with Class::DBI and am using the
TemplateToolkit via cap::Plugin::TT for my views.
My baseclass for my models uses Class::DBI::Pager.
In my run mode, I do something like
Dan Horne writes:
I'm not sure if this is useful, but here are my two cents:
I use CAP::AnyTemplate with both HTML::Template::Expr and TT in an existing
app so that I can transition existing templates from the former to the
latter. I have found it to be an excellent tool (thanks
I'm just getting started w/ CGI::Application, and am pretty excited.
I'm using the Template Toolkit.
It seems to me that it's a good idea to use CAP::AnyTemplate since
that gives me the flexibility to change templating systems.
I've noticed that several of the plugins (HTMLPrototype, DevPopup,
gle_color_url = "006792";
google_color_text = "00";
//-->
[cgiapp] problem w/ CGI::Application::Server and ...::Dispatch and a fix
George Hartzell
Retraction - Re: [cgiapp] problem w/ CGI::Application::Server
George Hartzell
54 matches
Mail list logo
