On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:12:58PM -0700, Dev Random wrote:
> Well, if you split up the files, then you can have nodes that do not have
> enough information to reconstruct any particular file. It's a future
> feature, I would hope.
I don't mean to be pedantic, but wouldn't you still then have al
Well, if you split up the files, then you can have nodes that do not have
enough information to reconstruct any particular file. It's a future
feature, I would hope.
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:16:29PM +0100, Leo Howell wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:12:43PM +0100, Patrick Kirk wrote:
> > Wi
I can't compile any of them. I tried using 'make' from the top level
directory, but no go. I tried it on Debian potato and RH 6.2.
On ezFCPlib I get:
/bin/sh: unexpected EOF while looking for `"'
/bin/sh: -c: line 2: syntax error
make: *** [default] Error 2
On fcpget I get the same error as ab
From: "Timm Murray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The biggest problem with getting a GNU/Linux for the masses is being
> able to walk into a store like Best Buy or CompUSA, see a box running
> GNU/Linux, and take it home. The hard part of GNU/Linux is just setting
> it up; after that, it just works. Yo
> My personal opinion is that Mandrake is a broken, broken distro. It is
> easy to use, though. And my opinion stems from personaly using ver.
> 7.2, so perhaps 8.0 has gotten better.
Shame that.
I guess it depends on hardware.
I tried 5 different Linuces, and chose Mandrake for it's overall st
David McNab wrote:
> From: "Seth Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> http://www.slashdot.org/yro/01/02/23/2134255.shtml
>> http://pcsupport.about.com/compute/pcsupport/library/weekly/aa030101a.htm
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/17230.html
>
>
> Looks like the copy protection 'arms rac
Let's go, then!
We gotta go *now*.
Seth
David McNab wrote:
>
> I guess the key to victory here is to make all efforts to keep the public
> suspicious of the content industry - a process of education, from the
> grassroots level of telling all one's friends and acquaintances, through to
> larg
From: "Seth Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://www.slashdot.org/yro/01/02/23/2134255.shtml
> http://pcsupport.about.com/compute/pcsupport/library/weekly/aa030101a.htm
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/17230.html
Looks like the copy protection 'arms race' is set to flare up like never
be
I found it!
http://www.slashdot.org/yro/01/02/23/2134255.shtml
And here's a couple of more substantial bits on it:
http://pcsupport.about.com/compute/pcsupport/library/weekly/aa030101a.htm
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/17230.html
Seth Johnson
David McNab wrote:
>
> you got any urls
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 05:19:22PM -0400, Seth Johnson wrote:
>
> Here's a good one to start with:
>
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/15686.html
>
> I'm still trying to find a later article I read, about how the "victory"
> over CPRM in hard drives should not be acclaimed so loudly beca
Here's a good one to start with:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/15686.html
I'm still trying to find a later article I read, about how the "victory"
over CPRM in hard drives should not be acclaimed so loudly because IBM
(if I recall correctly) had simply decided they could accomplish the
Hi,
For the last 9 hours, it's been impossible to SSH to my sourceforge accounts
on freenet.sourceforge.net and freeweb.sourceforge.net. Others have
complained about the same thing. SCP isn't working either.
Anyone know what might be going on?
Cheers
David
___
after using PutFiles I am able to retrieve the site i inserted at this
address...
MSK@SSK@Bm~R3H8CRekKt2Qb93gjIMCzmKaABJEzwSqr/2001052400-bush_inauguratio
n//
but not at...
MSK@SSK@Bm~R3H8CRekKt2Qb93gjIMCzmKaABJEzwSqr/bush_inauguration//
...
here is the putfiles command i've been using...
I've tidied up a couple of things, and eliminated a linux compile error.
SF shell was down, so I can't upload it just yet.
But you can get the updated sources and makefiles from
http://127.0.0.1:8081/KSK@src/fcp/fcp-progs.zip
or
freenet:KSK@src/fcp/fcp-progs.zip
Enjoy :)
David
- Original Me
Hi,
As some of you know, I'm in the process of developing a suite of FCP-based
Freenet tools.
So far, I've come up with an FCP library, a console request client and an
FProxy replacement.
*Be warned* - these progs are *horribly incomplete*, but have evolved far
enough to show the general direct
McMeikan, Andrew ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> with technocash/digicash/digigold there is no problems the value can be
> encrypted and sent with the spenders id unrevealed,
Yes, but how do you prevent a "replay attack"? Either by the person who
was supposed to receive the payment (what stops the
Thanks by your fast answer.
On Thursday 24 May 2001 11:05, you wrote:
[...]
> 'Out-of-band' just means you have to find the address of a trusted node
> somewhere other than Freenet.
Ok
> It's stating the obvious.
I see, sorry :(
> Once you have that node's address, however, you can use the
On Thu, 24 May 2001, Francisco M. Marzoa Alonso wrote:
> Joining the network is simply a matter of first discovering the address of
> one or more existing nodes through out-of-band means, then starting to send
> messages.
>
> [...]
>
> Surely the problem is that I've no idea what 'out-of-band mea
Hi there, I'm very interested in FreeNet project and I hope I'll be able to
participate in design and development when I've understand it right.
Ok, my english is not the best in the world as you can see, so some of my
doubts can be derived for my bad english, sorry :(
I've readed some about t
(snip)
| > and copyright protection can't co-exist. But computers and HR
| > managers with
| > the authority to fire you do comfortably co-exist. Is some kind of
|
| What does that mean? The computer and the manager don't comfortably
| coexist because the manager has total control over the com
20 matches
Mail list logo
