On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:12:58PM -0700, Dev Random wrote: > Well, if you split up the files, then you can have nodes that do not have > enough information to reconstruct any particular file. It's a future > feature, I would hope. I don't mean to be pedantic, but wouldn't you still then have all the blocks on your node when you request the file? Or maybe the node could ensure that it never cached all the blocks for one file - but then it would have to be able to tell the file from the block, which would defeat the point, no? I think I'd just better go back and sit in my hole for a while. -- Leo Howell M5AKW freenet:MSK@SSK@2vz8xnhEJyJOlBVNfBEOWaohQFEQAgE/freesite//
- [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filtering Patrick Kirk
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Patrick Kirk
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Mathew Ryden
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Leo Howell
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Patrick Kirk
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Leo Howell
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Patrick Kirk
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Dev Random
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Leo Howell
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Aaron P Ingebrigtsen
- Re: [freenet-chat] Legal responsibility and filt... Greg Wooledge